Although my wife and I dine out quite a bit, for whatever reason, we had never been to Community Table. Therefore, we were looking forward to visiting the restaurant, which we went to with another couple.
The host greeted us pleasantly, and we were shown to our table in a comfortable dining room, with adequate space between tables. However, the comfort was soon shattered when an infant sitting with his or her parents at the adjacent table let out a shriek that was well above high C and that achieved an impressive level of volume. This happened again at regular intervals, having the same effect that nails on a chalkboard do, except much louder. This, of course, was not the fault of the restaurant but rather of two clueless parents, who blithely ate their dinner while their offspring damaged the hearing of everybody within half a mile. The host finally approached the table and gave the child a warning look, but, for some reason, the infant failed to pick up on the social cue and shrieked away.
As to the food and drinks:
The women ordered gin and tonics, and my friend and I ordered Manhattans. The latter were quite good (so, it was reported, were the G&Ts). However, the cocktails were served in communion-size glasses. I find this particularly insulting. Cocktails these days tend toward the one-equals-DUI level, but this was overcompensating. It's a form of stinginess that reflects badly on a restaurant and that makes me resist ordering more than one. It's a cheap, transparent attempt to pad the bill, and it's rather classless.
As to the food, my companions were reasonably happy with their dinners; I was not. I ordered a fish dish. The big problem with fish in restaurants, and at home, is overcooking. However, my entree suffered from the opposite problem. It verged on raw, and it was not a fish (black cod) one would serve sushi-style. Its consistency was that of barely set custard, and it was red when I separated the flakes with my fork. I can enjoy fish that is just cooked; this wasn't. I sent the dish back, and when it was returned to me, it was just about the same as it had been before. Our friends, who had been to the restaurant before, told us that the chef resists diners' requests related to doneness and does things as he sees fit. Had my wife and I been there by ourselves, I would have asked for another dish. Instead, I just pushed the barely congealed fish around on my plate.
The restaurant seems to have quite a bit of potential, although our friends said that it is quite inconsistent. What sticks with me are Insultingly small cocktails that show contempt for customers and a refusal to correct a dish that has been ineptly prepared.
I don't know whether we will give the place another try. In any case, they seem to be doing quite well without us. read more