I feel that no one should come to this practice given the ophthalmologist I saw was not adequately trained while simultaneously overly confident in his irrelevant and misleading viewpoint. Any ophthalmologist should be able to identify a straightforward eye injury, and the point of a clinic with multiple physicians is that they should be able to refer to one another if there is any condition with which they are lacking experience. After an injury, I had by chance encountered someone from Carolina Retina who advised me with any eye injury it is critical to have the eyes dilated and examined by an opthalmologist; that person said any opthalmologist can perform this exam. I feel sure they meant, any competent ophthalmologist - and I will not include Dr. Compton. I will say to his credit only that Dr. Compton did identify Cranial Nerve IV injury and even wrote on my record a cryptic "CN-IV palsy," but he never took a moment to explain to me what that abbreviation means, what is the function of CN-IV, and he clearly did not know how to address the injury. If he did not remember his college courses on the topic, and if his colleagues could be of no help, well then there is youtube and he could have watched the superhero episode where my case is the guy in the blue suit (LOL) who comes in around minute 20 (www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKrCh6BnTR4). What is inexcusable is that Dr. Compton went off on tangents that completely set me off the course of recovery, arguing about philosophies of how concussions heal. What he needed to do was to prescribe prism lenses so that I could see and regain some level function visually. Instead, he asked me to come back again in a month to repeat dilating my eyes, to see if there were changes to the injury that might suggest prism lenses would become obsolete. First, CN-IV palsy is diagnosed without dilation. One dilation I have learned is adequate for examining an injury. Second, prisms are essential and you do not wait a month to allow a person to be able to see. I needed my eyes in order to review medical records and pay bills, for instance, not to mention to seek adequate care. There is already a wait for a prescription to be filled which is long enough. Third, I should have been referred to a neuro-ophthalmologist who has higher training than an ophthalmologist, along with an explanation of what the eye injury entailed and why I needed neuro specialty. Since I had been confused by Dr. Compton's proclamations as to how concussions heal (which was irrelevant to how the CN-IV palsy should be addressed), I dropped a written note to the office asking my question about the vision changes I note with head movements. The note was lost by the front desk, so I did not receive a response. When I finally got through to someone after great length, Dr. Compton called me directly but he was unable to answer questions for which the answers lie in the superhero youtube video available to anyone ... and he admitted he did not actually know about concussions. Yes, concussions, the topic about which he was arguing philosophy, as to whether prism lenses can "heal" a concussion or in fact do they heal on their own with time? That is when I was able to deduce I needed to be referred on. I have an end note about this practice. When I first arrived I was given some kind of vision test on a machine which I suppose takes a distance vision measurement. I was then put in a dark room with a young tech named Olivia. The room was scarcely lit at all, and she sat in the corner repeating my name in a creepy drawl "... whhhyyyy did yoouuuuu commmme heeeere?" I suppose she meant I had 20/25 distance vision and decided I did not need to see any ophthalmologist? I tried to simply answer that I was advised to see an opthalmologist because of an injury to my eye. Yet she continued the same question, ignoring my response. This was a very psycho beginning that nearly caused me to get up and leave until a nicer tech entered, and then Dr. Compton arrived with all of his trumped up confidence, drawing attention away from the matter at hand, toward variations in schools of thought which had no bearing. Had I been forewarned to steer clear of these practitioners, my path to recovery would have been somewhat more clear, like a prism lens. read more