Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Matt Baker Construction

    3.0 (3 reviews)

    Services - Matt Baker Construction

    Damage restoration

    Matt Baker Construction Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Matt Baker Construction

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of D C.
    0
    1
    0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Jon S.
    77
    7
    0

    10 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for General Contractors 5,025 times last month within 25 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Midwest Comfort Homes

    Midwest Comfort Homes

    3.5
    (2 reviews)

    To start, they're overrated, in my opinion. What started as promising ended poorly. I heard all the…read moreright things so we went with them. Turns out it was a mistake. I felt I was being belittled for not spending our money on a private adjuster and it didn't get better. It appeared to me as though I was to continue a fight with our insurance carrier to increase the profit for MCH. We were told we were being taken advantage of by the carrier. That's not their call to make. It was our decision and we had a difficult time keeping them within what we decided to accept. It is our home after all. We have the final input. They still wanted more. After countless emails and texts with the owner I was finally able to talk to a person and settle on the scope of work. You see, the owner refused to talk to me. Isn't that his job? We had a pre-construction meeting where our project manager wasn't sure how things would be done. He had to talk to someone else. Shouldn't a PM know the best way to proceed? Shouldn't you know what you're managing? After scheduling the work they arrived with a subcontractor. I was lead to believe they self-preformed the work. I was mislead. Not only was some of the material the wrong size it was also the wrong color and texture so it didn't match existing materials. They were "Sorry I caught it before they did". Really? What if I didn't notice it? Excuses were made and our aggravation grew. Plus we had to clean up after they left debris in the yard and unnecessarily blocked the garage! They were supplied a complete materials list from original siding construction. They knew exactly what to supply and failed miserably. Then, they decided to change to scope of work without consulting us. Again, really? There was no on-site supervision of their subs. I feel that some of the work was questionable at best. The roofing sub was ok but they were instructed to change that scope as well. I again brought it to their attention and the owner argued, via email it wasn't in the scope. After being proven wrong he blamed his office. I guess he's never heard "The buck stops here". MCH would not supply a warranty for the work they were paid to do. They gave us a manufacturer warranty for the material and made the roofing subcontractor had to supply a workmanship warranty. Our agreement was with MCH, not a subcontractor. If you build a home and have an issue, you go to your builder, not their subs. That's how the process is supposed to work. I felt MCH was simply removing any responsibility from themselves for the work they were paid to do, or oversee in this case. Then our PM was unavailable and I was told had no one to fill in. Not even a job foreman we didn't know existed until we decided to part ways with MCH. The foreman only existed to be a witness during a final roof inspection. My opinion. If we had a foreman the entire time, why wasn't he there to fill in for the PM or supervise the subs? At this point there was much more to be completed. Our entire project was sent into a tail spin and we were left hanging due to their total mismanagement and lack of communication. Imagine having to take over to get your home back together after an albeit minor tornado. It was a bit overwhelming. They were paid, at a premium price for what was completed even though it didn't follow the original scope of work. We felt we were in a legal battle with someone who claimed to be looking out for us. Everything they did was written and designed to protect their company and in the end we felt like the enemy. They even tried to prevent us from reviewing them. We were forced to consult our attorney. Never in our wildest imagination did we think this is how it would end up. I would imagine they have had satisfied customers but we certainly are not one of them. None of this review is intended to discredit or disparage, it is simply an honest summary of what we as homeowners had to endure. To say the least, anyone else would have been angry and frustrated too. I'm sure there will be a rebuttal to this review probably placing the blame on us but that's what happens when a company looks out for itself over their customers. Again, my opinion. We're not, as former customers of MCH telling you not to use them. All we are saying is do plenty of research, understand why they are no negative reviews and be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

    MCH has been awesome to work with. I've used them repeatedly over the years for projects both…read morelarge and small, from insurance repairs to new projects. They always deliver quality results.

    Power Dry

    Power Dry

    3.9
    (37 reviews)

    This company is amazing. They were there within 45 min after I called. They were very thorough…read morewith their inspection. Taylor did an amazing job with the clean up. I would definitely recommend this company.

    - My sump pump failed, flooding my basement. I contacted PowerDry for water mitigation, and on July…read more28, a representative named PJ visited, inspected the damage, and provided me a written bid of $7,712 to $11,079. PJ made several assurances: that the final invoice would likely fall at the lower or middle range of the bid based on his evaluation, that they would work with my insurance company (Traveler's, which has a $10,000 limit for sump pump claims), and that they would do their best to ensure I would not pay out of pocket for mitigation and restoration. Relying on these statements, I proceeded with PowerDry. - After the work was completed, I was shocked to receive an invoice for $13,056--well above the signed bid maximum of $11,079. When I asked for clarification on why the costs were nearly double the lower range initially promised, they could not provide a clear explanation. They admitted there were no unforeseen complications or delays but simply repeated that the charges were "industry standard." This directly contradicted PJ's assurances and the written bid, creating a strong impression of misleading and opportunistic practices during an emergency. -Additionally, during removal of the basement trim, PowerDry caused damage to my drywall that was unrelated to the water damage. When I requested they repair or take responsibility for the damage, they refused, claiming they were not liable. -I feel misled and exploited at a vulnerable time. PowerDry used reassuring promises to secure my business, only to inflate costs beyond the bid and refuse accountability for damages they caused. Their conduct feels like bait-and-switch tactics, prioritizing profit over honesty and customer trust. I am seeking accountability for their misleading practices, overbilling attempts, and property damage.

    Matt Baker Construction - contractors - Updated June 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...