This is the worst customer experience I've ever had with any business. I feel that consumers should be able to make informed decisions about how they spend their money, and when I had a problem with my car, unfortunately, I trusted Dowdy's to provide an accurate diagnosis based on the symptoms I described. However, Dowdy's Automotive wrote up a document that stated that the issue I described was an oil leak, when it was not. But, because I signed their inaccurate document accepting service for an oil leak, I now have no recourse for the situation I'm about to describe. The sickening part is that the Vice President of the company seems delighted about being able to keep my money knowing that there's nothing I can do about it. I say that due to his comments during a nasty phone call that he made to me which I will describe below:
My car was leaking all over the garage, so I agreed to have it fixed by Dowdy's for $1381. They said it was an oil leak. When I finally got the car back an entire week later, I noticed the car was still leaking. I gave it back to them for another week. They said the car was not leaking, but when I got the car back home the 2nd time, I immediately noticed that it was still leaking. Having been without my car for two weeks, I am understandably fed up and just want a refund. The unsympathetic and argumentative shop manager, Brandon, was bad enough, but it got worse when he gave my number to what turned out to be the company's very belligerent Vice President. The VP called me while I was at school. I told him that I didn't have a ton of time to be on the phone, and that I needed a quick answer from him about the refund. Instead of being extremely sorry for the situation, the inconvenience, and lack of trust that I now feel towards them, the VP was focused on me leaving an online review about my experience. My conversation with him was seriously shocking. He constantly interrupted me, and, at first he said that he was "not inclined to continue to work with me if I was going to leave a negative review." So, I questioned him and asked him if he was saying that he was not going to honor the warranty, because I wrote a review. He then realized that what he had said was not only inconsistent with his company's warranty, but also a violation of the consumer protection act, so he started to change his position and, he said, "incase the call was being recorded". He then said that he was "not going to go above and beyond" for someone who leaves a negative review while simultaneously refusing to give them a 3rd chance to fix the problem. Not going above and beyond under these circumstances is my definition of providing worse customer service than prior to his nasty phone call to me. As previously mentioned, they had a 2nd chance and an extra week to fix the problem. They had plenty of time to see the car leaking, but weren't thorough enough to figure things out. Anyway, I told him on the phone that, at this point, I felt they were incompetent and that I was going to now have the dealer diagnose my car.
I was not surprised to find out from the dealer that the leak that I had originally described to Dowdy's was not the source of fluid on my garage floor. It was a power steering fluid leak. So, here I've been over two weeks without my car and charged $1381 to fix what had to have been a tiny oil leak. (Who knows if there even was an oil leak.) Even though Dowdy's misdiagnosed the problem that I described to them as an oil leak when it was not, they still REFUSED to refund my $1381 because I "signed the paperwork" and agreed to an oil leak repair. That is seriously messed up. They decided to return only $300 and fixed the power steering for free, without providing a warranty on the power steering. Absolutely terrible "goodwill". In the end, I've spent $960 more than I needed to spend because the power steering was only going to cost $340 at the dealer. I finally had to agree to their bogus offer because I needed my car back in working order. It has been extremely inconvenient to not have my car for so long and I have little faith that this latest work will hold up given that there is no warranty.
The VP has since sent an email in an attempt to redeem himself and his company from his angry and aggressive behavior and his company's lack of thoroughness and also to have his final position "on the record." (Which is another indication of how nasty he was on the phone). Regarding the negative review, he writes: "What I didn't understand and what I tried to convey is why you would try to work with us on one side and drag us through the mud on the other side even before we had a chance to resolve the problem." (Really? You've had 2 weeks.) He also apologizes for "his part" in escalating the conversation. Well, "his part" was freak show insane. Neither his email, nor the final and best offer to correct the situation redeems them in my eyes when they are keeping $960 of my dollars. read more