Absolutely unacceptable experience with NUG Alameda.
I purchased and paid for a FULL OUNCE. When I got home, the bag immediately felt way too small, so I checked the label. Sure enough, they had given me HALF AN OUNCE.
So after already working a long day, I had to get back in my vehicle and drive all the way across town again just to collect the other half of something I had already paid for. And what did NUG offer for wasting my time and gas because of their mistake? Nothing. Not even the courtesy of a pre-roll. Apparently gas is free and customers' time has no value.
But it gets better.
After finally getting the correct ounce and making it home for the second time, I sat down to roll a joint. I cracked open one of the first little buds and roughly TEN SEEDS came spilling out.
What dispensary in 2026 is selling heavily seeded weed without disclosing that to the customer BEFORE the sale? Had they disclosed it, I wouldn't have purchased it. Period. I paid for cannabis, not a fucking gardening starter kit.
And while I'm at it, they're constantly poorly stocked on their own products. I've overlooked that repeatedly, but after this experience, enough is enough.
Mistakes happen. What separates a good business from a bad one is how it handles those mistakes. Giving a customer half of what they paid for, making them drive across town twice, doing absolutely nothing for the inconvenience, and then sending them home with seeded flower without disclosure is embarrassing.
Corporate needs to get its shit together. Cannabis dispensaries are disappearing left and right, and experiences like this are a pretty good explanation for why customers take their money elsewhere.
Do better, NUG Alameda. You lost me and are definitely losing more based on what I gathered. Too bad.
Jaime Galindo
OAKSTERDAM FOUNDING FATHER
Prop 215 SF/ Measure Z Oakland
1996 TILL INFINITY
Supplemental response to owner:
Your response is disappointing because rather than addressing the substance of my complaint, you are now publicly stating things that simply did not happen.
First, I was NEVER offered a five-pack of prerolls. That statement is false. I never declined prerolls because no prerolls were ever offered to me. I didn't ask for anything free either. When a business makes a mistake, I leave it entirely up to that establishment to decide whether and how it wants to make the inconvenience right.
The fact remains that I purchased and paid for 28g, but your store handed me 14g. I had already driven all the way home before I realized, from reading the label and noticing how light the package felt, that I had been given only half of what I purchased. I then had to drive all the way back across town because of your mistake.
When I returned, I was handed the ounce I had already paid for. That's it. There was no offer of a five-pack of prerolls, no other gesture for the inconvenience, and I was essentially sent on my way with "take care, have fun." So please don't rewrite what happened after the fact to make it appear that your business attempted to compensate me and I refused.
Second, your statement that it was explained to me that the flower "could contain a few seeds" before I purchased it is also not an accurate account of what occurred. Had someone disclosed to me that I was purchasing seeded flower, I would have passed on it completely. Period.
The price is irrelevant. There is a difference between inexpensive flower and breaking open a small bud only to have roughly 10 seeds come out of that small amount alone. And pointing out that I declined an $87 alternative doesn't somehow excuse selling a $69 product containing excessive seeds without disclosing that fact. A customer shouldn't have to spend more money simply to receive an accurate description of the product being sold.
As for your comments about "disrespect" on the phone, my frustration came after I had already been given half of what I paid for, made an unnecessary round trip across town to correct your mistake, and then discovered another problem with the product. Trying to make my reaction the focus of the conversation doesn't erase the events that caused the frustration in the first place, nor does it address my actual complaint.
Most concerning is that you have now publicly attributed specific words and actions to me that I maintain never occurred. Your claim that I was offered a five-pack of prerolls and declined it isn't an opinion or somebody's interpretation of customer service. It is a specific factual assertion about an event.
I strongly suggest that you stop publishing false factual statements about me in an attempt to undermine my credibility or discredit my review. I have no problem pursuing appropriate legal remedies if false statements about me continue to be publicly presented as fact, and I am preserving this response and the relevant communications. I would much rather see your business address the legitimate customer-service and product-quality. read more