normally, I read one star reviews and then randomly others. no time for that now, although, moot…read morepoint, since today, I took my sick best friend, Dexter, for ultrasound.
Today, it is hard to find competent and caring people who take pride in their work. I could not have expected more form a vet.
Dr. Wes Parquette, called me prior to ultrasound to discuss symptoms ( I missed call due to some phone issue which also did not show vm until 2 hours later) Needless to say, Dr. Parquette called back 2 hours later, discussed issues on phone, and then proceeded with ultrasound. After that, he thoroughly, discussed Dexter's medical issues and gave us options.
My wife is a non practicing medical doctor, trained overseas, English is not her native language and I am hard of hearing, even with hearing aids on, which distort voices. FORTUNATE THAT DR. PARQUETTE'S VOICE DELIVERY ENABLED ME AND MY WIFE TO UNDERSTOOD 98% OF WHAT HE WAS SAYING. IT WAS A CRITICAL SITUATION FOR MY BEST FRIEND DEXTER AND IT WAS PARAMOUNT THAT WE UNDERSTOOD DR PARQUETTE WHICH WE DID.
REITERATING, COULD NOT HAVE ASKED FOR MORE FROM A DOCTOR, WHO WAS SUPERB OVERALL.
The front desk staff was exceptional as well.
A question from a non vet like myself. Why do some vets give multiple shots on same day eg at 15 weeks which caused a month of sickness and multiple vet visits, and most likely created long term problems, or prior to surgery to remove a cyst in ear where a vet in Springfield , Va. who gave at least 2 shots a week before the surgery, (I subsequently because of that cancelled surgery and went to different vet) .
Given dog's negative reaction to hospitals due to his bad experiences at such, is it not better to simply do cost benefit analysis, given dog's visible shaking and attempts to go out under the door and get him out of hospital asap rather than "do the obligatory" shots which may not help , and clearly not a current priority. Or was it a case of get the $$ now , rather than risking not coming back for the shots after the surgery.
And digressing a big again, today, I read, a second NFL player sentenced for dog fighting of over 15 years, ignoring his earlier conviction and failed state not imprisoning him, the first time, and his esq adding insult to injury claiming his $30,000 fine would deprive him of his medical needs, and his "conviction and loss of dogs , is enough punishment" paraphrasing, eg 190 dogs taken from him, all used for fighting and judge does not admonish the paid ''' p...e" esq claiming that the loss of dogs (taking away dogs for their safety) is tantamount to punishment. IF THEY SYSTEM IS NOT TOTALLY BROKEN DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS.