As a response to your comment:
"The day of your project install there was no owner, project or property manager present"
I have informed you that I will not be onsite that day, but gave your people the contact information for the Project Manager and Owners from the General Contractor's firm and told you they have full capacity to speak on my behalf if I was not able to be reached. They were onsite the day of the installation and inspection.
"so Liberty Bay Solar reached out to you to bring to your attention that because both buildings had 2 separate meters each, we recommended installing 4 separate systems, allowing independent monitoring. You agreed with this decision. "
Yes, we discussed this and to confirm, I wrote you in an email on July 3rd 2018 I did say 'we will need 4 separate systems for R Street...'
"PG&E requires a signed job final inspection card from the city which we submitted. The system we installed was on time, to code and operational."
True, but it was not interconnected to PGE because a PTO was not provided since the NEM application was pending for over a year as a result of a job card with mistakes being submitted to PGE. Even if the City made a mistake, it was submitted by your company to PGE without checking it. I would take responsibility that it was my understanding that an operational solar system will include a PTO by PGE which will allow us to sell excess energy back to PGE. In your definition apparently it meant that if it powered the house, the work is done and interconnection to PGE was not your problem but rather an 'extra service' that you provided.
"When you reached out to me with concerns via email I responded that I would reach out to PG&E to see what was missing. I reached out to PG&E many times to get a response. You asked for updates at the beginning of every week and I responded explaining that I had yet to hear back but would keep checking. A week before Christmas I went to the city and asked for a copy of the job card again to see if we missed something. After looking at the card I noticed that the application to PG&E showed 2 solar systems instead of the 4 "
This is because your company submitted 2 sets of NEM applications instead of the required 4 sets for each individual systems that we all agreed upon. If you do not submit a NEM application for each meter, how is PGE supposed to know that there are 4 systems instead of 4?
"The city clerk admitted it was a mistake by the clerk that typed the job card. "
It may have been a typo by the City, but your company submitted it as is without checking it, correct?
"He asked a city inspector to re-review, make the change and sign a new job card, which I personally submitted to PG&E to update your NEM application. It was because of this that you ultimately received the PG&E approval via email. My company is cc'd on that email, because the permit is under Liberty Bay Solar. Another solar company could not have made those changes."
Assuming what you are saying is correct, it took the other solar company a few hours to figure out what was wrong with the application and had a solution and the corrections sent within the same day. It took you over 6 months and me emailing and calling you every week / every other week to figure out what was wrong with you making no effort to reach out to us. Now it has taken 12 months from installation to finally be interconnected with PGE.
"this one wasn't a typical install and required more attention from both sides, as a project manager and a business I hope you can see that."
I fully understand this, but I am more upset about the method in which you dealt with the situation, which was deflection and avoidance which is not ok for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation, which was to get the system connected to PGE, and the only thing you did was trying to avoid the situation.
"We stayed under your negotiated price and worked to provide the level of service we expect from Liberty Bay Solar."
Actually, you requested more money because you said you need to rework/rewire the system, and we paid that right away. You knew in advance that there was construction onsite. If it was going to be an issue, 'you' should have told us that we should wait until the final inspection on the construction was over to install the solar. Yet, your company said it was ok. I was even ok with getting you paid for the additional work since mistakes do happen. Again, you are the professional installer here, not us and we ended up paying more. read more