Europcar - Fraudulent and Dishonest practices (this company is currently in litigation over its dishonest and fraudlent practices.). NO NOT USE THIS COMPNAY
On November 7, 2018, I arrived in Scotland and proceeded to the Europcar kiosk to pick up a rental car I'd prepaid for through Expedia.com for eight days. As part of my rental, I'd requested (but not prepaid for) a GPS unit. As the male service agent at Europcar checked me in, he informed me that for £1.50 per day, he could upgrade my rental to a better car with had a built in GPS unit. I declined, indicating that a handheld GPS unit would be fine. For a good 10 minutes he continued to insist that I needed the upgrade; however, I stood firm. Finally he relented, but then said, "Oh, it looks like while we've been discussing this, that my last handheld GPS unit was rented by another customer." Since we were the only people at the counter this seemed unlikely. Discouraged, and knowing he was lying, I said I would just forgo renting any GPS unit; however, this restarted the agent insisting I needed to upgrade my vehicle with a built in GPS unit for an extra £1.50 per day. Just wanting to get my rental and proceed with my trip, I said, "Fine, I'll take the £1.50 per day upgrade with the built in GPS." He said "great," and finally proceeded to process my paperwork. He next tried to get me to upgrade to Eurocar's insurance coverage which I declined. Finally he presented me my paperwork, telling me to quickly "Just sign here, here, and here, and you're all set!" Unfortunately for the service agent, I'm an attorney and I always ready from start to finish everything I'm asked to sign, which I did, and I immediately noticed an additional (to what I'd already prepaid) £120 per day charge. I asked what the charge was for, and he said, for the built in GPS unit. I told him that he'd said it was only £1.50 per day (which is what he had said--many times; my wife who was with me verified that this is what he'd said.). The service agent responded, "No, I said an extra £15 per day." This was a bold-faced lie. I told him that if it was £15 per day extra, I didn't want the upgrade. The agent, now upset, cancelled the transaction, and finally gave me the keys for the vehicle I'd originally asked for. I wish the story ended here, but it does not.
I drove the car, a Kia with approximately 10,000 miles, for the next eight days without issue or incident. On the ninth day I returned the vehicle and was astounded when the Europcar service agent said the left front tire was damaged. I was shocked; there was no damage to the tire--zero. I said, "What? Where is there damage?" He pointed to the top side of the left front tire and said, "There's a budge here; it's damaged." I looked at the tire; it looked totally normal to me (and certainly was in the exact same condition it was when I rented it). I tell the service agent first that I see no damage, and second that I have no idea how it could have sustained any damage because I had no accidents or incidents while driving the vehicle. He says to me, "It became damaged through use; simply driving on it can damage it." This ridiculous nonsensical explanation makes no sense (and even if it did make sense a tire with 10,000 miles on it that had spontaneously become damaged through the act of driving would be covered under warranty as it would be a manufacturing defect.). Next the service agent hands me his handheld and tells me to sign. I ask him, what am I signing for? He says, "You're agreeing that this is the only damage to the vehicle--once you sign this you'll only have to pay to repair the tire." I can already see where this is going; if I sign, I'm committed to only paying for a new tire; if I don't sign I'm open to paying for any other bogus damage Europcar dreams up between now and the time they send me a bill. Outrageous. Naturally any consumer in this situation is in a tough position; like me, I have a flight to catch; hence, I cannot spend all day arguing with an intransigent service agent about nonexistent damage he's fabricated. I refuse to sign, as I absolutely do not agree that there is damage (because there is none), and the service agent says I will hear from Europcar in the next 7 days to negotiate settlement.
It has now been three days since I returned my vehicle and I await a bill for Europcar for non-existent tire damage and (since I didn't sign agreeing to limit the damage to the tire) I fully expect them to tack on additional non-existent damage.
This is the first and last time I will ever rent a car from Europcar. I returned a car to them, unscathed, and they are now fraudulently claiming the vehicle returned to them was damaged--it was not. I chose Europcar because they were the lowest cost option; however, I now understand that they are anything but the low-cost option as their business model seems to revolve around fraudulently charging consumers for damage. read more