Highly recommend! Mark is trustworthy, talented, and pleasant to work with.read more

From the owner: We work with innovative startups, entrepreneurs, and other businesses on a range of issues…read moreincluding formation, financings, M&A, contracts, and much more.

Think he's retired now.... But excellent ... helped my son get his money back from a car dealer…read more The car died a 1/2 hr after we left . Maybe 20 some years ago. Consumer lawyer... got the lemon law in

One of the most professional lawyers I have ever worked with. He respected my time and my wallet…read more Great attorney. Lemon Law issue with a used car.

I have worked with invigor on various projects from copyrighting some designs to general contracts…read moreand they have always been amazing to work with. They provide fair pricing up front and deliver what they promise. It is always super easy to get feedback or status updates from them and I would recommend them to anyone looking for an awesome legal team.

Best law firm for Incorporating and writing contracts for your business. The people here are fast,…read moresmart funny, and very helpful.

Rocky is the best lawyer we could have asked for. He is fair & thoughtful and very communicative…read more He was also kind enough to give us helpful business advice. Would highly recommend hiring him for all your legal needs.

Lumina Legal are professional, responsive, convenient (with virtual meetings), and explain legal…read moreconcepts clearly for us non-lawyers to understand. I'm very happy with both the service and legal advice they provided me.

Highly Recommend! Responsive, Respected and Relentless sums it up!…read more During a kitchen remodel, we found major water intrusion damage to one of the units of our small, four-unit condominium. When our insurance company denied our claim we hired Levy, von Beck and Comstock to go to battle for us. We worked directly with Dave von Beck. Dave and his firm have years of working with denied insurance claims, real estate, construction defects, and condo law. He's the ultimate expert and he's probably the most responsive and detailed professional I've ever dealt with. If I called, he'd take my call in the middle of a meeting. He answered my emails over the weekend. Everything he said was clear and made sense. He could cite and interpret crucial pieces of information in copious pages of technical engineering reports. He really shepherded us through a process that was far more complicated than we imagined. We were a small informal HOA, with no experience in dealing with anything this serious. His attention never wavered from this project, he was clearly "all in" with us. Additionally, Dave has built close relationships with all the key players: He knew our insurance companies lawyer, he already knew and worked with the construction company that we chose to do the repairs to the building. He knew when to call in an engineer and he knew and educated us on condo laws that we were unaware of. He understands and speaks construction at all aspects, practical and legal. He became the hub of information, pulled everything together and kept everything moving forward. Dave is a straight-shooter, ethical and trustworthy while also being persuasive and a real bulldog. And the bottom line: he got our insurance company to pay for both the investigative work and all of the repair! I can't recommend him enough. A life saver!

Seth is a stellar and trust-worthy lawyer. He helped me to get out of a terrible first home…read morepurchase. He worked diligently to protect my buyer's rights from a combative and un-ethical realtor company. As a result, he not only restored my faith as a first time home buyer, but also obtained the best settlement for me in less than 10 days! I feel so lucky to find Seth and his team at Levy-Law. He set an example of what a great lawyer should be. Also Thank You Katie for the initial help! Very happy about the results. I'll refer Seth and Levy-Law to all my friends and co-workers!

I was a witness to a very traumatic car accident, I did a search online and somehow this attorneys…read moreoffice showed up even though they do a completely different type of law, they immediately got back to me, which was very professional, in fact I emailed Friday evening around five pm, and I had an email in my inbox Saturday morning. That is very respectful and if or had I needed an attorney in there field this is definitely an attorney's office I would highly recommend. The professionalism, the outstanding quick response, and just the fact that they cared enough to get back to me alone meant allot and that they care. They let me know that they wish me the very best but it is not in their area of law. Again I believe they do construction law. I would however have loved for them to have given me in their opinion and what type of attorney I would need, however that gets tricky since they don't know the case with the brief email I sent well enough to give me possibly that information. I have a very complicated case, however thank you for the outstanding service of just having respect to get back to me so quickly, especially when I have been going through more than anyone should. Thank you !!

TLDR: overly high hourly rate, did not get enough attention to our case to justify price…read more After we bought our house, we hired a foundation consultant to come evaluate a sunken corner of the dining room. He found evidence of rot and evidence of the previous owner covering it up with new wood. He recommended us to hire a real estate attorney and sue the seller since they should have disclosed the history of rot. We got a quote from a contractor for $50k for the repairs. Dave was very responsive by e-mail. He did not offer a free consultation and charges $575/h which is very high, but we thought the price might reflect the quality of work. However, his counsel was subpar. He reviewed our documents and pointed items noted by the inspector that were found in other areas of the house, unrelated to the area in question. When we were evidently very confused, he never offered a call to discuss the details. He kept insisting that we didn't really have a case, so we also didn't want to consume more of his time and burn our money. The demand letter that was drafted was not convincing at all, since Dave never took the time to understand the details. The seller was not convinced and hired their own attorney, at which point Dave advised us not to pursue them in court. That was the only time we talked on the phone. The subpar letter costed us $1,970. I feel like any attorney could have drafted a letter of this quality, even those who charge $300/h. Do not make the same mistake as me in assuming that higher rates equal higher quality of work.

Mr. Lake helped me and fought for me through a long process with a company. Was awarded more for…read moresettlement then we thought would happen because of how difficult the company was being. He pulled out all the legal strategies with this company to make my case stronger than I would have ever thought of using, than again, that's why he's the lawyer and I'm not. Overall: 10/10 would sue with Mr. Lake again.

Mr. Lake helped me immensely in a time of need. He communicates very well and was transparent with…read moreme throughout the entire process of what was going on and what optional and needed steps were next. While I'm sure no one ever hopes for a need for an attorney I can't assure you, if I ever have a need for an attorney again he is the first person I will call.

When tasked with forming a nonprofit, I was referred to Judy Andrews at Apex Law Group by a former…read morelaw colleague that I trusted 100%. It was a perfect match. Judy and her team walked me through the process, helped me make decisions, took care of the details and forms, and got the nonprofit started on solid footing. I knew I didn't want to try and create a nonprofit organization myself - figure all of the minutia out on my own - make horrible mistakes that would get us in trouble with the IRS and lord knows how else - and was more than happy to pay competent people to do their thing. Their fees are incredibly reasonable IMHO. I can't say enough about my experience with Apex. I always recommend them and continue to stay connected with them.

From the owner: Contract Law/Startup & Formationsread more

September of 2017, I was involved in a copyright infringement case. Being in my early 20s, I had…read morenever worked with an attorney. I had no credible resources and to be honest, my biggest concern that an attorney will take the case just for money and I will be left with debt and lose the case. The Haas law proved me wrong. First, I learned about the law firm through a referral from the King County Bar Association - because I did not know any lawyers and was afraid of the 'copyright troll lawyers' that are everywhere on the internet. Phillip and Maureen (I believe they are married) were attentive, great with communications, sent me an invoice every week, and provided updates on a regular basis, and produced amazing results for me. I was not only happy with the results but more importantly how they handled my case during the process. They made me feel comfortable and took a huge burden off my shoulders. I also received back the remaining amount from the deposit I had made. I usually do not write reviews, but seeing a very negative review for this firm actually motivated me to share my experience on here. I.. definitely do not think they are 'con artists.' Based on my experience, I will be going for them next time I am involved in a court case.

Lots of great reviews but honestly i think they were there just for the money or just hugely NOT…read morecompetent at all. I had an issues with an insurance claim, them denying my claim even though they couldn't prove they weren't liable. I was very clear from the start that my moving company made the insurance with the insurance company and that I did not have any documentation regarding the Pick-Up but only regarding my Drop-Off. 1. Phone consultation with Maureen, of course she can't predict the outcome but the consultation was quite specific as to know if there was a strong case, which she said there was, she also said the proof of being liable or not, was on the insurance company side that's why they have investigators. 2. Philip Haas calls, I find out that Maureen is not my lawyer but he will be, never spoke to him before and with a non-disclosed speech impediment that makes communication hugely hard (first bad sign, she should have contacted me telling me and asking if that was ok before taking a non refundable deposit). 3. You would think that if you change your clients lawyer without consulting with the client you'd provide every bit of information that very client provided you; NO, not the case, Philip Haas started doing his own without even consulting first and knowing half of the case; I got mad and made him aware of it and he apologized saying Maureen didn't send him the info (hugely unprofessional and once again a very bad sign); because I did send details by email there were no way you could dispute it so he wrote off what he charged me so far with whatever he did without consulting me first and then made out a strategy plan with me starting from zero (that was well appreciated but not encouraging). 4. If you know the case and set up a strategy but then a month later forget about details regarding that case...VERY BAD SIGN. Philip Haas blamed it on the fact they just had a new born and thanked me for reminding him the details of my case and because of that now he would re-contact the insurance company (he should have done that immediately as soon as he got another "claim denied"). 5. Out of the blue turns out that the burden of proof that the insurance company is liable or not, is on me and not on the insurance company so even though the insurance company can't prove they aren't liable, I have to prove they are by providing documents of the truck and driver that did my pick-up... SURPRISE! So my lawyer knowing from the start I did not have any documents alike as I specified from the beginning with Maureen, at the very end let's me know I have the burden of proof which, not having documents is clear that there is no case at all then, that's just common sense right? ... can you prove in a very specific way who the driver and truck type is? NO, you don't have a case, so why on earth would you take a case knowing there is no case? Because you mislead and was there for the money OR just were hugely incompetent not knowing what you were doing. Philip Haas insists they didn't mislead, which can be true but that just means they were hugely incompetent then, which one is it? A. The insurance company have to prove they are not liable and if they can't the burden for compensation is on them at least partially. (Maureen) -" knowing I didn't have documentation to prove specifics regarding the pick-up driver and truck type. Or B. You have to prove the insurance company is liable (even though you were insured) in order for them to compensate you by providing documents of who the driver and truck type was (Philip) Both are contradicting each other and therefore misleading or simply pure incompetence in the matter. Federal court? That was an option it would just have been hugely costly and time consuming and no guarantee of anythings pf course. Bad experience and a huge waste of money!