Highly recommend! Mark is trustworthy, talented, and pleasant to work with.read more

From the owner: We work with innovative startups, entrepreneurs, and other businesses on a range of issues…read moreincluding formation, financings, M&A, contracts, and much more.

Lots of great reviews but honestly i think they were there just for the money or just hugely NOT…read morecompetent at all. I had an issues with an insurance claim, them denying my claim even though they couldn't prove they weren't liable. I was very clear from the start that my moving company made the insurance with the insurance company and that I did not have any documentation regarding the Pick-Up but only regarding my Drop-Off. 1. Phone consultation with Maureen, of course she can't predict the outcome but the consultation was quite specific as to know if there was a strong case, which she said there was, she also said the proof of being liable or not, was on the insurance company side that's why they have investigators. 2. Philip Haas calls, I find out that Maureen is not my lawyer but he will be, never spoke to him before and with a non-disclosed speech impediment that makes communication hugely hard (first bad sign, she should have contacted me telling me and asking if that was ok before taking a non refundable deposit). 3. You would think that if you change your clients lawyer without consulting with the client you'd provide every bit of information that very client provided you; NO, not the case, Philip Haas started doing his own without even consulting first and knowing half of the case; I got mad and made him aware of it and he apologized saying Maureen didn't send him the info (hugely unprofessional and once again a very bad sign); because I did send details by email there were no way you could dispute it so he wrote off what he charged me so far with whatever he did without consulting me first and then made out a strategy plan with me starting from zero (that was well appreciated but not encouraging). 4. If you know the case and set up a strategy but then a month later forget about details regarding that case...VERY BAD SIGN. Philip Haas blamed it on the fact they just had a new born and thanked me for reminding him the details of my case and because of that now he would re-contact the insurance company (he should have done that immediately as soon as he got another "claim denied"). 5. Out of the blue turns out that the burden of proof that the insurance company is liable or not, is on me and not on the insurance company so even though the insurance company can't prove they aren't liable, I have to prove they are by providing documents of the truck and driver that did my pick-up... SURPRISE! So my lawyer knowing from the start I did not have any documents alike as I specified from the beginning with Maureen, at the very end let's me know I have the burden of proof which, not having documents is clear that there is no case at all then, that's just common sense right? ... can you prove in a very specific way who the driver and truck type is? NO, you don't have a case, so why on earth would you take a case knowing there is no case? Because you mislead and was there for the money OR just were hugely incompetent not knowing what you were doing. Philip Haas insists they didn't mislead, which can be true but that just means they were hugely incompetent then, which one is it? A. The insurance company have to prove they are not liable and if they can't the burden for compensation is on them at least partially. (Maureen) -" knowing I didn't have documentation to prove specifics regarding the pick-up driver and truck type. Or B. You have to prove the insurance company is liable (even though you were insured) in order for them to compensate you by providing documents of who the driver and truck type was (Philip) Both are contradicting each other and therefore misleading or simply pure incompetence in the matter. Federal court? That was an option it would just have been hugely costly and time consuming and no guarantee of anythings pf course. Bad experience and a huge waste of money!

Wonderful experience It was absolutely a pleasure working…read morewith Haas Law. They took their time explaining everything in detail. I would definitely recommend using them as your lawyer.

Alloy Law has made every initial step of the way easy to understand and helpful. The initial patent…read moresearch was extremely in-depth and professional! So far I would highly recommend their services!

Working with Walker Weitzel on my provisional patent has been an outstanding experience from start…read moreto finish. He not only reviewed my patent thoroughly but also guided me step-by-step through the entire submission process with incredible clarity, precision, and patience. Walker extremely attentive, timely, and detail-oriented. He explained complex patent language in a way that was easy to understand, refined my ideas to make them stronger and more defensible, and ensured every section was organized and professionally written before submission. His ability to merge deep technical knowledge with genuine care for his clients' success is rare and truly admirable. He went above and beyond to make sure everything was perfect -- and his professionalism, communication, and follow-through gave me complete confidence. I'm so grateful I found him and would highly recommend Walker Weitzel to anyone seeking expert help with a provisional patent or any stage of the patent process.

They care only about the money....I feel that my case was handled in such a way as to enrich this…read morefirm rather than with my best interests in mind. My first bill was almost $50,000! and I had absolutely no idea that the bill was anywhere near that, even though I asked so many times to be informed of costs as we went along. They didn't provide me with any financial information until I got this first bill after 2 months. In the end, I got nothing for my money and had to go for a settlement that was detrimental for me, just to bring an end to the financial cost. I would never have agreed to the strategy or expense had I known that I would get nothing in return but a $70,000 bill. Although the attorneys are friendly and hard working, they didn't advocate a successful strategy, and succeeded only in enriching their own firm at great expense to me.

I contacted Katrina regarding a trademark question. Though a complicated scenario, Katrina helped…read moreme understand the potential problems I might face very clearly. I really appreciated her knack for using simple language and examples to help me understand everything. This put me at ease immediately and was very helpful. Additionally, Katrina was very prompt and personable. Even though I contacted her during the holidays, she got back to me right away and kept me updated on her progress the whole time. She has a warm, professional manner and is incredibly hardworking. I heartily recommend Katrina and look forward to working with her again.

So a few months ago I received a infringement case from my isp. I had no clue what to do so I went…read moreonline and located attorneys that specialize in these type of cases through the Electronic Frontier Foundation (I should note that I went around to local attorneys for help but they had no clue what to do). So the EFF has a list of attorneys, and I kid you not I wrote an email to every single one of them. Katrina (P.O.V legal services) was one of the first to actually reply back to my email. After receiving replies back from most of the attorneys I decided it would be best if Katrina represented me. Once we met she informed me exactly what was going on and the different options I could take, which gave me a sense of relief. From there on she was extremely helpful, if I ever had a question I would shoot her an email and she would reply and answer back pretty fast. She worked with me around my busy work schedule as well. To summarize I can say that I am very pleased with my experience with POV(Katrina). So if you were like me a few months ago frantically looking for an attorney for matters like this, go with POV!