I am writing this review to alert the home buying consumer to purchase a construction hard hat and be well versed in reading a land plat before purchasing a home from NVP, Inc., located in Manassas, VA. We were informed 6 days before closing that there was a restrictive water easement on the property we we'd signed a contract on, which cordoned off 25% of the land by way of a split rail fence. This was not disclosed in writing nor verbally, but depicted on a plat of the property which was not reviewed with us.
We contracted to purchase a new constructed home in Manassas, VA, from NVP, Inc., a regional home builder. The lot size was .54 of an acre, or 23,500 square feet, and the plat which was shown to us depicted a different model home that what we selected. We walked the lot before the construction started, but neither the Superintendent nor the Sales Manager saw fit to share with us the fact there was a water easement on the lot, which would cordon off approximately 5,000 square feet with a split rail fence and essentially infringed upon the free, unencumbered and exclusive right of the homebuyers property. The plat, which did not depict home we chose, and which we signed off on without the knowledge of the water easement, referenced a "proposed split rail fence" amongst all the other easements, lines, figures and writing on the plat. While this it is legal not to provide verbal and written details of restrictive easement on land or property, other than a drawing on a plat, in the spirit of transparency and full disclosure to a potential homeowner, one would expect a reputable builder to disclose any and all information that could potentially affect a potential buyer's decision to purchase. It is not too much to expect, given the fact that we were purchasing a home valued at $588,000 to be given all facts regarding the property in order to make an informed decision whether, to purchase this property or not. I don't believe any homebuyer who thought they were purchasing a lot a 1/2 acre lot, but would have a fence that restricted the use of 25% of such lot, would consider the price and value of the lot in the same manner, nor the withholding of such information be considered a transparent transaction.
Several weeks before closing, we requested a copy of a plat which depicted our home, and not the model home, because we were to fence in the back yard of our property. The plat we initialed upon signing the contract had a different model home than what we'd purchased. During the weeks leading up to closing, we repeatedly requested the plat, and were put off. We found 6 days before closing that representatives of NVP were working behind the scenes with Prince William County Zoning and Planning to what NVP called "resolve" the erection of the split rail fence, before we went to closing. Were the dealings with Prince William County Zoning and planning an effort to delay the installation of the fence? I will be filing a FOIA request with the county related to the interaction with NVP, Inc. to determine this.
Through diligence, much personal time and effort, we received zoning approval and a permit to move the fence to the perimeter of our property. Unfortunately, we've requested NVP to take responsibility for this and have been ignored, virtually dismissed. Rude, disrespectful and dishonest are some of the words that come to mind when I think of NVP. To totally ignore our request for them to relocate the fence and not have the decency to respond, either yea or nay, is the height of arrogance and disrespect for the homeowners you sold a .41 acre property to, but charged them the price of .54 of an acre. read more