The obedience program is unstructured. The current system provides no prior information on which specific commands will be taught in any given session. We simply sign up for "obedience" generally. In the sessions I attended, the "heel" command was introduced only once and practiced on one other occasion. This inconsistent approach means that dogs and owners receive varying levels of exposure to critical commands. For instance, a dog attending multiple sessions might be introduced to several commands, while a newcomer in the same class could be expected to master a command with minimal prior instruction. This lack of a clear, progressive curriculum makes it challenging for dogs to properly learn and solidify behaviors. I strongly believe a more structured, transparent curriculum indicating expected commands per session or level is necessary for effective training. This is one reason my dog did not earn his certificate.
Furthermore, during our initial evaluation, I raised concerns about Bandit's nipping behavior and was advised that this issue could be managed through the group obedience training. While I understand the scope of basic obedience, I accepted this guidance based the facility's expertise. The company should reconsider providing such advice for reactive behaviors, nipping, or other specific behavioral issues within a standard group obedience class setting, as it sets unrealistic expectations and is generally not appropriate for addressing these complex needs.
Egregious Incident on May 17th
Most critically, an egregious event transpired during our final training session on May 17th. While dogs were tethered, the hardware securing a lead to the wall failed, causing another dog to break free and attack Bandit.
What followed was deeply concerning: Instead of quarantining the aggressor dog, my dog, who was the victim, was isolated in a corner behind screens, away from the other dogs. This response was inappropriate and unjust. The aggressor should have been immediately removed and quarantined, not the victim.
Additionally, upon inspection, it was evident that the lead hardware was secured to the common drywall with only two small screws. This setup is clearly insufficient and poses a significant safety risk. ZoomRoom should immediately reassess and reinforce all tethering points with more durable hardware and secure anchors to prevent such a dangerous occurrence from happening again.
I did not address my disappointment and anger on the last session. I was too emotional and needed time to process what had occurred. However, I remain profoundly displeased with both the training program's structure and, more acutely, the handling of the incident and the inadequate safety measures that led to it.
I am left questioning the efficacy of the training advice I received and the safety protocols in place. As a result, I will not be utilizing your establishment for any future services, nor can I recommend Zoom Room to other dog owners. read more