This case involves Darrell Wayne Levi, a 54-year-old rideshare driver from Houston, Texas, who entered into a commercial vehicle rental agreement with UCars, operated by Fast Track Leasing LLC and VGM Buggy Mobility LLC. The Plaintiff claims that the Defendants misrepresented the condition of the vehicle, a 2023 Nissan Pathfinder, and that these actions led to financial damages, emotional distress, and unauthorized charges to his bank account.
The Parties Involved
Plaintiff: Darrell Wayne Levi
Age: 54
Occupation: Rideshare driver
Location: Houston, Texas
Complaint: The Plaintiff seeks compensation for financial damages, emotional distress, and the unauthorized charges made by the Defendants.
Defendants (Trade Name: UCars):
UCars is the trade name under which Fast Track Leasing LLC and VGM Buggy Mobility LLC operate.
UCars rents vehicles for commercial use, including vehicles used for rideshare services.
Firestone:
An independent repair and service provider that assessed the vehicle and confirmed the presence of pre-existing damages.
The Rental Agreement
Date of Agreement: December 23, 2024
Vehicle Rented: 2023 Nissan Pathfinder, VIN 5N1DR3AA3RC252462
Rental Terms: The rental agreement stated that the vehicle would be in "good working order" and free from damages, except those explicitly disclosed in Exhibit C. The Plaintiff relied on these representations when renting the vehicle for use in his rideshare business.
The Alleged Misrepresentation and Breach of Agreement
Claim 1: Defendants' False Representations about the Vehicle's Condition
The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants falsely represented the vehicle as being in excellent working condition when, in reality, it had multiple mechanical issues. The Plaintiff claims that these issues became apparent during use, including significant handling problems while driving at higher speeds.
Claim 2: Undisclosed Pre-existing Damages
On January 23, 2025, the Plaintiff took the vehicle to Firestone for an assessment. The report revealed multiple pre-existing damages including problems with the front struts, tie rods, and steering components, which were not disclosed by the Defendants at the time of the rental. The Plaintiff contends that these issues rendered the vehicle unsafe for use.
Unauthorized Transactions by UCars
Date of Unauthorized Transactions: February 3, 2025
The Plaintiff claims that UCars (operating under this trade name) debited two unauthorized amounts from his bank account--$30 and $200--on February 3, 2025, despite revoking any consent for further charges.
These debits occurred after a breach of contract when the vehicle was found to be in poor condition and after the Plaintiff revoked consent for future payments.
Legal Claims
The Plaintiff has filed a judicial complaint against UCars (Fast Track Leasing LLC and VGM Buggy Mobility LLC), Firestone, and is seeking relief based on the following:
Breach of Contract
The Defendants failed to provide a vehicle that met the terms of the rental agreement and was in "good working order."
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants misrepresented the vehicle's condition, leading him to enter into the rental agreement based on false information.
Violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA)
The Defendants violated provisions of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) by misrepresenting the quality and condition of the vehicle and failing to disclose critical information.
Negligent Misrepresentation
The Plaintiff claims that the Defendants supplied false and misleading information about the vehicle's condition, failing to exercise reasonable care.
Unjust Enrichment
The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants benefited from the rental payment despite providing a vehicle that was unsuitable for the intended purpose.
Unauthorized Transactions
The Plaintiff seeks restitution for the unauthorized charges debited by UCars from his bank account, asserting that they were made without consent.
Damages and Relief Sought
The Plaintiff is seeking the following relief:
Actual Damages: For financial losses caused by the breach of contract, misrepresentation, and unauthorized charges.
Punitive Damages: To deter similar conduct by the Defendants in the future.
Restitution: For the unauthorized charges made by UCars.
Attorney's Fees: To cover legal fees associated with bringing this action.
Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest: For the time during which financial damages have accumulated. Have you had a similar experience with UCars or any of its related entities?
The Plaintiff seeks to connect with others who have had issues with UCars, including problems with vehicle quality, unauthorized transactions, or any other related concerns. If you have experienced similar issues or would like to learn more about how to file a complaint, or if you're interested in joining a class action lawsuit or seeking legal assistance, please reach out. design52company@gmail.com read more