I cosigned on my daughter's lease for a studio apartment in Surf Developments building.
On November 14, 2022, my daughter accidently locked herself out of her apartment at 12:30 am. She called two numbers listed on her lease as contact phones for Surf Development, no one answered either call. My daughter then had to find a locksmith to gain entry to her apartment. This incident in and of itself is not where we take grievance with Surf Development. Our grievance revolves around the next series of interactions with Mary McCauley and later a gentleman named Tom.
So, after my daughter regains access to her apartment she begins to query Mary via email about an emergency maintenance phone number. Here are the emails of that interaction.
Tenant query:
"Good morning,
After speaking with your company yesterday afternoon (11/16/2022) regarding a new door handle for my apartment, I was told I would be emailed the number necessary for emergency maintenance. Please send me that number ASAP, as it is not readily visible on your website nor is it specified in your outgoing voicemail message. Please also keep me abreast to progress made to install a new bottom door handle to my unit."
Mary's response:
"All of our contact information is on your lease."
Tenant query:
"Thank you for letting me know. Please still specify which specific number is for emergency maintenance. I see 3 different phone numbers in different spots on the lease."
Mary's response:
"Use the tenant portal. If you are locked out at 1:30 am we would also charge you. Please refer to your lease."
This is where our grievance begins, clearly Surf Development has no On Call Emergency Maintenance phone number. Instead of communicating that directly when asked, Mary decides to refer us to the resident portal and the lease again. If no one answers a telephone for an afterhours emergency, we do not have much confidence that a resident portal maintenance request would dispatch help any faster when needed in an emergency. My daughter has now paid a so called "locksmith" a ridiculous amount of money to gain entry. But this is not where the shortcomings of Surf Development or our grievances end. The doorknob to the apartment needs to be replaced and my daughter arranges for Surf Development to install it while she is at work. When she returns that evening there is a new doorknob and deadbolt. Not long thereafter she receives this invoice.
We are now miffed by this invoice and begin to question these charges and request pictures of the damage that would result in this charge. Following are emails between myself and Mary McCauley.
Hello Mary,
This is Guy Ramstack, I am the co-signer on the lease for my daughter.
She has informed me that she was locked out of her apartment and had to call a locksmith at 12:30 AM on Monday, November 17, 2022, to get her back into her apartment.
She also informed me that you replaced the lock and charged her $300.00.
Can you please tell me what damage was caused to the door and why this was not treated as a lock replacement as outlined in your lease under Additional Agreements and Covenants #9?
#8. If tenant is locked out after business hours, (M-F 5:00 p.m. Sat after 2:00p.m., all day Sunday) Management charges $125.00
#9. If tenant loses keys and needs locks changed the charge is $125
Mary's response:
Guy,
Your daughter hired a locksmith. The company she used did significant damage to the door frame as well as the lock itself. This is destruction of property. I suggest you follow up with the company that did the damage to the door.
My response:
Hello Mary,
Could you please provide me with photographs of the alleged damage?
Also, can you explain to me why your on-call phone was not answered when Vanessa called you about her being locked out?
Mary's response:
Guy,
Please see the attached photo. All maintenance requests should be through the tenant portal.
My response:
Mary,
Please provide me with a photo of the repair that was made to the door prior to the lock being re-installed.
Mary's response:
I'm done. If you need a photo, please request from your daughter.
I asked for supervisor information and was directed to Tom:
I made a phone call to Tom at Surf Developments to discuss the situation that Mary could no longer be bothered with. I inquired why this was not treated as a lock change. Tom stated that he hires skilled labor to perform maintenance and that they may have had to work on the door jamb and may have been there all day fixing it. I was incredulous at how it takes anyone a full day to change a lock. At this point it was obvious that Tom was not going to provide any honest answers to my questions. I made comment on Mary's lack of professionalism and customer service, to which Tom replied this is a tough business and she has been very successful. As if this is an excuse to treat people unfairly and gouge tenants for simple maintenance work. The lease is up soon, and Surf can have their apartment back. read more