My normal review would be the good, the bad, and the improvements.
In this instance, there are some twists and turns. My review will be carried out in several acts, as a play unfolds.
Starting with the positive, followed by the normal and OK, then next would be... the suspense. As twists happen, here is the bad, and the finale would be - what I might do differently
So here is my review in four acts:
Act 1: the positive:
The gentlemen who greeted at the door was lovely. He was surprised that there was 10 of us standing at his gate, looking to come in. Doing his job as gatekeeper, he politely asked the hidden door keep if we should be allowed in. Moments later; hurray! we made it.
Act 2: the normal and OK:
door greeter brought out actor who pretended to "let us in". Nothing else was normal and OK.
Act 3: the suspense
The fake actor, who pretended us to do us a favor to let a group of 10 in, to an empty bar, placed us in a waiting room area, far from any normalcy, or nice ambiance. As my uncle Rick would say: "this is a waiting room...we shall wait... until the time has arrived to be seated at our table". Here, after just a few short seconds, our collective realized that we would appreciate being in the open room, where we may freely enjoy drinks, in a nice room, whilst in the company of others... all the while too also observe the thoughtful decor of the hidden, tucked away bar.
Suspense continues: "you must all be on 1 check", he says. "That's fine", stated by myself. As I walk in to the bar, I think to myself; that's odd, we are about to spend $400 - $600. Why would they care how the transactions happen?
The suspense continues part 2: I walk out of the waiting area, to see if there is room in the "actual bar" area for us. To my surprise........
There was approximately 25 open seats! HURRAY as I thought. It's not a big deal. We shall move from the waiting hole to the luxury of normalcy!
curtains close....
The narrator approaches the crowd: " HEAR YE, HEAR YE"... he says: the collective now believes that they may approach the normal room, for which we will allow them to accompany the others.
Act 4: THE BAD:
The fake actor says: "We can't seat you 10 people, because we won't be able to force all of you on one transaction. We as a bar shall not inconvenience ourselves by multiple transactions, or servers". I thought to myself, how dare us for thinking this would be ok!
The actor continues to tell you that they can not seat us, because the way the tables are set up, would not for us to have multiple servers. My reaction was that this was ok. As we do not need to sit together, we just need to be near each other. The actor turned to use and made us feel as
If we were being the most inconvenient patrons of all. I said to the actor "do you not want us here? If so we can leave". They responded with no response to try and accommodate. This was asinine. So we left.
THE FINALE:
If I owned this bar, and I had a half empty bar, I would not push away a group of 10 people. Or 5 people. Or 2 people. I would want to treat all people well. If this were my bar, I would take care of my door person. That gentlemen's was sweet, kind, and deserves a great operational backing. If this were my bar, I would not be pretentious. I would welcome more people, as long as they were respectful. If this were my bar, I would train my staff to be respectful, and treat humans the right way. Because the current regime, does not.
Ping me when ownership changes. Won't see your all til then.
The end. read more