First, I'm not here to go back and forth with whoever runs Piper's social media. I don't have the…read moremental bandwidth for snarky comments dismissing my experience. I'm sharing our family's honest experience to help parents make informed decisions.
Our son attended Piper Preschool in Irvine from October 2023 to 2025. We left deeply disappointed and heartbroken. He had an expressive speech delay and sensory processing challenges and made tremendous, documented progress through speech and occupational therapies. We did everything we could to support him and the school: paying full tuition, volunteering, serving as room parents, catering staff lunches, giving teacher appreciation gifts, and collaborating with administrators.
When Piper said he needed additional support, we arranged an in-class occupational therapist twice weekly within one week, at approximately $1,000 extra per month. Still, repeated incidents eroded our confidence in how he was treated.
Several incident reports differed from what we witnessed or learned from other parents. I personally saw another child punch my son in the face after he tried to return a ball. My son came to me crying, but the other child received immediate attention while my son was largely overlooked. The report omitted important details until I requested corrections. Another time, Piper said my son had "picked up and thrown" a child. That child's parent explained that my son had excitedly hugged and lifted him and they both fell. My son also came home with bruising around his eye after reportedly being hit, yet no incident report was provided.
I witnessed other children displaying similar behaviors without the same scrutiny or intervention. These experiences made us feel our son was treated differently and raised concerns about possible implicit bias.
After we shared our experience, several parents privately described similar concerns. I cannot independently verify their accounts, but I believe they deserve to be heard. One said her son, who had a speech delay, was not offered readmission after briefly leaving Piper. Another said the school directed them to their recommended evaluators, who found their son's development typical for his age. Next, a parent told me, who is an attorney, her son came home with bite marks after reporting that boys pinned him down, covered his mouth, and one bit him. She said a teacher told him to line up when he sought help crying, and she considered subpoenaing surveillance footage. Another family said they repeatedly raised bullying concerns but felt dismissed instead of receiving a meaningful investigation. Hearing these accounts reinforced our concern that our experience was not isolated.
The emotional toll was significant. For months, school calls made me anxious, fearing another request to pick him up. Rather than feeling like partners, we felt we were constantly defending him. After we raised concerns, administrators told us he could stay at Piper full-time with an approved one-on-one aide or move to another school full-time. We chose to leave.
At his new school, he is thriving emotionally, socially, and academically, even earning academic awards. To me, this highlights the difference between the academic environment he needed and the childcare-focused environment we experienced at Piper. Leaving was the best decision for our family.
Other families may have positive experiences; this review reflects ours. Parents deserve transparency when choosing a school. We hope Piper takes these concerns seriously, treats every child fairly, listens to families, and documents incidents accurately and consistently.
Families seeking information on licensing citations and safety can consult the California licensing record:
https://www.ccld.dss.ca.gov/carefacilitysearch/FacDetail/304371581