In response to Patricia since the google review wasn't enough (I've seen her on multiple platforms)
It's always interesting when someone has to keep rewriting the story because the truth apparently wasn't dramatic enough the first time.
You're certainly entitled to dislike the food, dislike the hours, or leave a negative review. What you're not entitled to do is turn assumptions into accusations and present them as facts. Claiming you were "pretty sure" your chicken was cat isn't a legitimate criticism it's an accusation based on absolutely nothing. And repeatedly telling a story doesn't magically make it true.
As for the comment about the "little English" spoken at the restaurant that says considerably more about you than it does about the people working there. Mocking someone's English or implying that the quality of their food should somehow be connected to how much English they speak is unnecessarily rude, ignorant, and completely irrelevant to your complaint.
And the outrage over being turned away five minutes before closing is certainly something, especially when the business has already explained its policy. You may not agree with the policy, but acting as though being told "no" at closing time is some shocking personal offense doesn't make your version of events any more convincing.
You've made your opinion clear. You didn't like the food, you didn't like the service, and apparently you didn't like the answer you received afterward either. At some point, continuing to repeat the same story starts looking less like "holding a business accountable" and more like being determined to get the last word.
Hopefully, now that you've had your say several times, you can move on. Not every restaurant is going to meet your expectations and not every business is required to change its policies just because you're unhappy with them.
Oscar, me and my family love you guys, we love the food, the drinks, the atmosphere. I am so sorry you guys have to deal with people like her. read more