I found this museum a little too "rat maze" for me. Go up the stairs to start, go back downstairs for the more contemporary temporary show, but once you go downstairs through the weirdly lit bright orange hallway (which I thought must have been the start of the contemporary show, but no, apparently they just like orange, as in "house of orange", the ruling class of Amsterdam back in the day). Anyway, through the orange haze that then turns into an orange hallway with mirrors giving it a funhouse effect. Okay, through that, back up some stairs and there you are in the Transmission show. This show has transgender/transvestite/transexual themes and there is a glossary of terms on the wall explaining the different types of gender and gender association and identification. There is also a photo exhibit featuring the work of two Amsterdam photographers who both apparently encountered the same transvestite/transgender subject, one encountered the subject in the park walking the dog, and the other at the hospital for sexual reassignment.
I don't really know what I think of this show. The topic is not new to me after living in the Bay Area of SF for over 10 years, To me when a photographer gloms on to a 'flamboyant' subject, it is more about the flamboyance than the meat of the issue or the talent of the photographer. The photographer doesn't have to do much with a subject who is getting off vogueing for the camera. This is falling for the surface appeal of a character and not allowing the viewer to see what is behind the mask. The subject can deflect examination with the smoke and mirrors of performing for the camera. There is a real person there and this a person of a certain age that most likely had a lot of suffering earlier in life before society was aware or tolerant of such things. To make it through that harshness and emerge on the other end fully embracing yourself is the story but that story isn't told, it's all about the wig and the costume and the make-up. It is lazy on the photographer's part and I was left feeling cheated because it may have been a series of portraits but they were not too revealing.
What was kind of cool about the show, however, is that the brochure invites commentary and suggestions for other inclusions. The viewer is invited to email the curator about other things to add or submit their own story. I think there must be a much more powerful story out there to be told and this show is inviting that story to have a voice. So, while I didn't think this show was very good overall, I see a curator who is willing to consider tweaking it and building from this point and moving forward with this work in progress.
For the other part of the museum featuring the history of Amsterdam, I found it surprisingly light on content and too heavy with narrated short film clips and interactive activities. Some of that is good, but this museum seemed to rely on it too much. Perhaps this venue is more geared for school field trips and if so, then it is probably entirely appropriate. I just found it tiresome that everything was 'dumbed down' for a 3 second attention span. Maybe that's just me. read more