After reading about the Research Center online and emailing for hours, I traveled to this location…read morewhen in the area (1300 miles from home) to do some basic research. In the clerk's office, they told me they only had LAND DEEDS and that if i wanted any birth/death records I had to go to the CITY clerk's office. She suggested if I wanted wills I could go to the courthouse. When I got to the City clerk's office they said they had nothing in the years I wanted and that I could try the Health Department. It was apparent to me the "hand doesn't know what the foot is doing" in this Oswego Records Center operation? I left empty-handed and disgruntled from the runaround among buildings within the city.

This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from…read more https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court.

Terrible!!!! All he had to do was get me child support arrears and he couldn't even do that. He had…read moreno idea what he was doing !! Oh by the way it took him seven years To get to the court house . He kept rescheduling my case like I didn't need the support money. And give him copies of your paperwork !!!! Never an original. You will never get them back regardless of the hundreds of times that you beg them back from him! He should have been Barred!!!!! This attorney is suspended for Malpractice- (script from https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-fourth-department/2019/2019-ny-slip-op-00806.html We find respondent guilty of professional misconduct and conclude that he has violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0): rule 1.3 (a)--failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client; rule 1.3 (b)--neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him; rule 1.5 (d) (5) (ii)--entering into an arrangement for, charging or collecting a fee in a domestic relations matter without a written retainer agreement signed by respondent and the client setting forth in plain language the nature of the relationship and the details of the fee arrangement; rule 8.4 (b)--engaging in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer; rule 8.4 (c)--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; rule 8.4 (d)--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and rule 8.4 (h)--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. We also conclude that respondent has violated 22 NYCRR 1400.3 by failing to execute a written retainer agreement in a domestic relations matter that provides for, inter alia, itemized billing statements to be sent to the client at least every 60 days. In determining an appropriate sanction, we have considered respondent's submissions in mitigation, including his statement that he has reduced his case load and has hired a legal secretary to assist with law office scheduling, billing, and communications with clients. We have also considered, however, certain factors in aggravation of the misconduct, including that charge one arises from a lengthy course of conduct intended to deceive a tribunal and that charge two concerns respondent's severe neglect of a client matter that resulted in substantial harm to the client. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until further order of the Court. Read less

The accommodations were subpar, food was bland, and the staff was a bit pushy. I will not be…read morereturning, under my own will anyways,

Worst customer service ever. The employees seem to feel no obligation to help the people they…read moreserve. Calls are not returned and when you call back and finally reach someone they cant even tell you a court date. They requested me in court but put no effort in working out a date. It took over two years to get a hearing at which point they counted their loss and dropped everything. It is amazing they can stay in business with this degree of concern for the bussiness.

I had some employee issuis and hired Bellingham to help out. Everything from start to finish was…read morethorough and professionally handled. Excellent service. I would recommend them to anyone.

From the owner: Bellingham I S handles cheating spouse investigations, child custody investigations, background…read morechecks, process services, employee screening, tenant screening, and more. We handle our investigations discreetly, confidentially, professionally, and with the highest integrity.

Built between 1859-1860, this two story structure was designed by Horatio Nelson White (1814-1892)…read morewho is responsible for a number of Northern New York buildings including the Jefferson County Courthouse Complex (Watertown), the Chemung County Courthouse Complex (Elmira), and the Webster Wagner House (Palatine Bridge). The limestone walls could use a power washing. The unique design here is the portico that is topped with a domed cupola. I would love to get a close up of that! The building was updated in 1891 and again in 1962. No longer a single structure, the annex is attached to the rear and the entire structure takes up the whole block. I was here after closing hours so I did not get to see the inside. The basement, which was the country jail, has been restored and functions as a law library and offices. Much of the courthouse grounds are now Washington Square, which includes a small playground. [Review 1547 of 2024 - 463 in New York - 22570 overall]

Sitting proudly perched on a hill sat the Three Bears. Oddly located in the small crossroads Town…read moreof Ovid, within the Finger Lakes Region. Set between the two largest Finger Lakes, Cayuga to the east and Seneca to the west. This section of the Region during the mid-1800's was and still to this day is the home of a vast farming community. The Three Bears served from around 1845 with Papa Bear (Court House), Mama Bear (Clerk's Office after 1860), Baby Bear (Clerk's Office before 1860). All three side by side with the same beautiful architecture, and stepping down in size. Truly unique and rightfully on the National Historic Preservation list. Today, they still stand (sit) proud and each showing their age. Carefully being maintained by Supporters and Volunteers. For more information please visit the Friends of Three Bear's website: https://threebearsovid.org/ I truly enjoyed visiting the site, looking in the windows, enjoying the elevated view, and strolling through the Town of Ovid.