Sarah was our wedding photographer. Overall we were quite pleased with her work…read more
Her usual wedding photography packages are very pricey now, and were somewhat pricey at the time, but when we discussed with her that we only wanted coverage of one location (our reception) for 3 hours, she agreed to a price that was less than half of her wedding rate at the time (it was around 1/4 of what she charges for weddings now, if that gives you any idea). So she might be willing to work with you in terms of price range ... that's cool. For what we paid we got the 3 hours of shooting, online gallery for 6 months, and disc of images that we could print out, email, etc. Of course we would've gotten more "frills" if we had gone with an actual wedding package, but hey, we got what we really needed.
I chose Sarah because of the incredible work that is displayed on her website/blog, and I have to say that compared to that stuff, we did not get her best work. Still much better than most of the wedding photography I see out there. But since we paid so much less than these other people did, well, I understand.
My photo disc and image gallery took a bit longer than expected (gallery was up a month and a week after the wedding, disc came in the mail shortly thereafter), and I was kinda sad that there was only one picture of our reception flowers (which was a close-up of a few individual flowers so didn't actually show the beautiful arrangement from Central Market), and no pictures of our garland exchange (traditional Indian thing where the bride and groom exchange lei-like garlands, one of the few actual "ceremony" elements of our reception), but literally a whole old-school roll of film (25+ images) of 4 of my cousin's kids twirling around and blowing bubbles. I did fill out an online form pre-wedding in which one specified what one wanted documented, and I did not mention the flowers or the garland exchange though I did mention other things such as our dance and some specific portraits with different relatives, so that's why I'm not really downgrading this review (pics of my cousin's kids were not requested ... I guess I expected a few, but not that many). I guess I just figured a picture of the flower arrangements was sort of a common-sense thing (the garland exchange was probably not all that great to look at anyway and was over in a few seconds, so is not that big of a deal). It's been a little over half a year since the wedding, and I can't really remember what the beautiful flowers looked like, and nothing can really be done about it. On the other hand, I get new pictures of my little cousins all the time (from their parents) ... they aren't gone forever like the flowers are.
I also wanted to mention that though no plus-size/more-to-love/overweight/fat people are depicted on her website/blog as far as I can tell, Sarah does do a good job of taking pictures of those of us who fit that description. As I said, that might be hard to figure out from looking at her stuff online, and well, half of the population is overweight, and (in my opinion) we're harder to photograph eye-pleasingly than the other half, so it's an important point. (Edit: it's now mid-April, months after I wrote this review, and Sarah has just put some pictures of a "more-to-love" couple up on her blog, so ignore this paragraph, I guess)
I really do still think that we got an extremely good deal for what we paid, and we do love our wedding pictures. I would recommend Sarah as a photographer and would just caution potential customers to be sure to be very clear about what they want pictures of, which I guess is common sense anyway.