The initial email I sent to Pearson Vue concerning my test issue: "On November 8th I took the GMAT at the Pasadena Pearson Vue Professional Center at 1:45 pm. While taking the test, I and a few others endured two very loud employees. During the first portion of the exam, the Integrated Reasoning to be exact, two employees began to converse behind the glass windows. The test takers were given headphones (used for tests that used sound; therefore, these were not noise cancelling headphones as they tried to sell them as), as an attempt to muffle out the noise, to no avail. I could not focus during the whole first section; test takers are videotaped so I'm sure one may look up the videos showing my agitation for evidence. After practically guessing a majority of the questions in this section, due to an inability to concentrate and hear my own thoughts over the sounds coming from the employees outside of the room, I raised my hand in protest. One of the employees came into the room and I made him aware of his and the other employee's disturbance; he apologized. I understand the employees need to speak to one another but the rooms we are tested in are nowhere near sound proofed; therefore, employees need to be more sensitive to our needs or create better testing accommodations. These tests are expensive and huge determinants of our future; to have them compromised is inexcusable. Thanks to the lack of consideration from the employees and the testing facility's lack of noise proofing I missed 11 out of 12 questions in the Integrated Reasoning section; I got 1 answer right. In the end my score was devastatingly affected due to such a low outcome in the before mentioned portion. I would appreciate a solution to be ratified; perhaps grant me all of the answers in the Integrated Reasoning, unjustly missed due to a noise disturbance, or allow me to retake the test, free of charge, in a quite environment, and without affecting either scores or the value of my tests (schools take note as to how many times you take the GMAT). I feel if these employees hadn't disturbed me so early on I would've performed quite differently on the GMAT. My confidence was shot after finishing the Integrated Reasoning section; I knew I'd failed after picking one incorrect choice after the other; I was running out of time and had to choose. So much time was wasted re-reading questions over and over in an attempt to comprehend through the racket occurring just outside the window. This issue I've incurred, as well as the other test takers, deserves to be acknowledged and resolved."
The following issues that transpired post-email:
I contacted the company the day of through email; they directed me to their customer service line. After discussing my issue with the nice lady in India I was sent an email, from Pearson Vue, suggesting I was a liar, because they supposedly spoke to the employees at the center I took my test and they said I never complained about any such disturbance, that I was given headphones and ear plugs that were noise cancelling but didn't use them, they suggested I refer to the rule book since I didn't follow them considering I didn't "complain the moment it occurred" (which I did and which is on tape), and therefore decided to close my case. I responded to their libel filled email by suggesting they refer to the video, they saved of me taking the test on the day of my exam, to see how frustrated I was at the disturbance that occurred, to try the "noise cancelling headphones" for themselves to truly see they are not what they attempt to label them as (if they were then they wouldn't allow any noise in and they would cost about $200 each; I doubt Pearson would pay such a price), to see that the reason I didn't put the earplugs in my ear is because I don't put things in my ears and because they were torn up (as if used), and to check out the rule book themselves, because I followed all the rules they suggested but it was them who did not follow the rules, considering I was promised a quiet professional environment to take my test in and that promise was not fulfilled. Once they received my email they reopened my case only to later return their reopening letter with an even more disturbing notion, that it is still my fault I failed to perform decently on the integrated section, that I should've taken advantage of the earplugs, that noise is uncontrollable coming from the employees that work at Pearson Vue (even though promised otherwise), and that if I wished to take the test again I'd have to pay but at a discounted price and if I wished for a quiet environment to take my test in that I apply for the next test as a disabled person so I may obtain said "quiet environment" necessary for my mentality (is the assumption I need a quiet environment because I might be disabled legal?). I don't know about you but I know a lot of people, whom aren't "disabled" whom need a quiet environment to make important decisions. read more