t has now been 16 months since i bought a car from them that have been in repairs since day one, they are refusing to give me all my money back and they are now refusing to give me a loaner car trying to force me to take less money than i paid into a car i never had no do not trust this company tom, ravonda, and
especially darion they will lie and cheat you so now i must sue them in order to get justice while still paying a carnote with no vechicle to drive or mess up my already shaky credit and stop paying my carnote and get another car but im not going to do that so i will be setting an account to keep you posted on
tik tok and instagram of the antics and lies napelton honda and my progress to justice so stay tune will update soon cause im now very irked with the company and people i wish i never walked into this dealership and i should have known better and almost every loaner car was also faulty and had to got to repair after driving 30 to 45 days so beware you might be happy today and sad later cause the car has konked out on you do no trust
according to the law (section 407.020 r.s.mo.), any act of fraud, false promise, misrepresentation, false pretense, unfair practice, or the omission or suppression of information in connection with the sale or advertisement of a product or service is considered illegal.
the mmpa statute declares many things to be unlawful. for example, the mmpa specifically prohibits "any deception, fraud, ... [or] misrepresentation." it also prohibits "the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact." however, reliance is expressly not an element of the mmpa. thus, the fourth element requires the plaintiff to establish that his or her ascertainable loss was the result of either deception or fraud or a misrepresentation or the concealment or suppression or omission of any material fact by a defendant. any one of these acts is sufficient to satisfy this element. importantly, the mmpa specifically states that these acts can be before, during, or after the sale. the only requirement for this fourth element is that the ascertainable loss be the result of the unlawful act. there is no requirement that the ascertainable loss occur before the sale. thus, damages which arise after the sale are also recoverable (as they would be in other cases). read more