I had never been in a situation where I needed to hire a lawyer before, but I knew the law was on…read moremy side and that I was having a serious issue with a former employer. I'd done my own initial research and felt confident I had a case, and a friend in my industry, who had gone through something similar, referred me to Laura. She spoke so highly of Laura and her team that I decided to reach out. From my very first call, I knew I had found the right person. Laura listened intently, asked smart and strategic questions, and quickly framed what the strongest case would look like to recover the funds that were legally owed to me. While the process itself was stressful, I was genuinely shocked by how seamless Laura and her team made everything feel - and how fast they moved. I expected the situation to drag on for months, but they resolved it in a matter of weeks. I hope I'm never in a position where I need an employment lawyer again, but if you're reading this feeling confused, frustrated, or unsure about whether to hire one, call Laura and her team. You will not regret it.

Intake process was horrible, I told the lady a million times the purpose of my call then she tried…read moreto play victim and hung up in my face & refused to transfer the call to the attorney for consultation

Not to be crass, but I absolutely HATED lawyers until now. A colleague referred me to Elizabeth…read moreGeorge. She is perceptive, tenacious, resourceful and charges fairly. The consults are invaluable. When being bullied, it's nice to have peace of mind that you are on the right side of the law. I plan to continue to use her services whenever questions come up.

No one likes doing research for attorneys - it usually means you have a problem. But after my…read moreinitial consultation with Fern, I came away knowing I was working with someone who would represent my interests in an aggressive yet professional manner. The level of communication was excellent and her fees fair. At a time when your stress level is probably high, Fern and her staff will make you feel like you have friends that will handle your issue - and they did. I cannot recommend them highly enough.

Peter & his team were extremely quick and efficient to help me. They were extremely prompt & great…read morelisteners - really felt like they understood what I was going thru and were going to do anything to help. Really impressed and would recommend to all. -Ati

Peter was so helpful when I called for some help on understanding an employment contract. He got…read moreback to me very quickly (within a few hours) to set a time to chat in the next business day. When we spoke, he was no-nonsense and quickly gave me so much insight into the parameters of my contract. I felt so confident in knowing what I legally could and could not pursue. He also gave me confidence that if I needed litigation I could come to him. Definitely worth reaching out to!

David went out of his way to help me recover what was…read more rightfully due to me from my prior employer! I was treated with the utmost respect, kindness, and understanding! Communications from his office on what was going to happen was excellent! I have gone out of my way to recommend his services to any of my friends and family that have needed help!

Daniel C was extremely rude he wouldn't let me explain the details of my case he kept cutting me…read moreoff to ask for my name & phone number when I was giving the details about my case. I told him I am trying to sue IDES for not handling my two cases that are currently at the Daley Center. This firm is paid by the state to help IDES claimant's, and he is abruptly ignoring my request to speak with head of counsel

*Disclaimer: Cole Sadkin represented the opposing party in my case. I won my case,…read moreself-represented, but I believe people looking for counsel should have as much information as possible.* *Also, due to the nature of the case, I proceeded as Jane Doe. Trial concluded on March 18, 2026.* Attorneys who appeared on this case through Cole Sadkin: Mason Cole, Michael Krzywicki, James Cook, and Judith Kott Cole Sadkin represented the opposing party in my civil case for sexual assault and battery in Cook County Circuit Court. I was a pro se litigant who, despite the tactics and conduct I experienced throughout litigation, ultimately obtained a six-figure jury verdict in my favor. This review is a warning about the professionalism and litigation conduct I personally observed from this firm. Over the course of litigation, multiple attorneys cycled in and out of the case. The handling of the matter often felt disorganized, hostile, and unnecessarily aggressive - far beyond zealous advocacy. One of the most disturbing moments involved attorney Judith Kott's characterization of my deposition testimony. During my deposition, counsel specifically asked whether I was "going in and out of consciousness" because I was falling asleep. I answered: "No. It is because he was strangling me." Despite that clear testimony, Ms. Kott later argued to the Court that I had testified I was going in and out of consciousness because I had been drinking heavily. She used that mischaracterization to argue that my memory was unreliable due to alcohol consumption. That was not my testimony, and the transcript reflects that in black and white. Ms. Kott also repeatedly insinuated that I must have had "secret counsel" assisting me behind the scenes because, apparently, the idea that a pro se litigant could effectively litigate a case against experienced attorneys was not something she was prepared to accept. The reality is that I did my own work, learned the law, prepared my own filings, and tried my own case myself. As litigation became increasingly hostile, attorney James Cook began including my abuser directly on communications with me. I ultimately had to tell him myself that the practice was inappropriate and eventually felt the need to bring the issue to the Court's attention. The firm also objected to nearly every one of my motions in limine that were ultimately granted by the Court, including motions barring attempts to use prior sexual encounters as evidence of consent to the assault at issue, and motions barring a contributory negligence defense, implying that a victim has some duty to proactively prevent another person from physically or sexually assaulting them. At another point, an attorney from the firm sent a lengthy argumentative email directly to the judge attempting to litigate issues outside proper procedure, prompting the Court to remind counsel that the parties were not to litigate through email communications. I was genuinely astounded by the level of unprofessionalism I experienced from this firm. Even setting aside my concerns about litigation conduct, I would not hire this firm based on competence alone. Again, this is not sour grapes from a losing party. I won. This review exists because people deserve to know what kind of conduct they may encounter when dealing with this firm.

Hired Mason to be our closing lawyer and he was happy to take an up front payment for the project…read morebut as time progressed he wanted more and more money to do what was already supposed to have been part of the initial deal (writing, reviewing, and sending a contract). Overall I wouldn't recommend Mason Cole as he will just make ambiguous promises and then will ask for more and more money to honor them.

Screener was a complete unprofessional jerk…read more I was explaining that I was talking to other employment attorneys that said I needed a wage attorney. He tells me "not to be pissy with him" Confused I tried to reiterate and he kept being a condescending asshole. So I hung up and continued my search. You should as well.

Very professional always kept in touch with me and they made my case a priority highly recommendedread more

Disability claim: They handled my case and did a good job of…read moreseeing it through until the end. Some of their legal staff are friendlier than others and address your questions and concerns; while others follow a cold script of waiting until you hear from us! As with any business that is expected because people are people wherever you go! I'd recommend staying on top of your documentation that you send because it may not be reviewed until the end and you will need to make sure you have as much as possible to bring to your hearing! The judge will want support of your claim and knowledge justification for your request! You have to be on top of your case ! Just because you have a lawyer doesn't mean you are off the hook with fighting for your case! I believe they work harder for you when they see you making the suggested efforts in the Dispariti engagement letter.

I thought law firms giving unsolicited calls after an accident was illegal or in bad taste. Someone…read morerepresenting themselves as associated with this firm has been contacting me after I was involved in a hit and run accident last week. They initially presented themselves as someone associated with the police report. I thought it was an investigator, just to realize they were fishing for information to convince me that they can get me up to $50,000. They then continued to call over the past week and I ignored the number when I would see it pop up. Today, I was expecting a call from insurance and the same guy called from a different number. It's giving ambulance chaser Beware

I spoke with Chris briefly a few hours ago and, after explaining several times that I was calling…read moreon behalf of a friend who was in a similar circumstance as I am with an elderly relative who intends to leave their property in their respective wills, he implied I was a scam artist. Several times he bemusedly said, "something's not adding up," and the like when I said the above. My sister Cathy recommended him but I guess I didn't give Chris the impression I was well-heeled enough to trust to work with. It's honestly a typical response from uppety first and second generation Greeks who have an education, at least that's been my experience going through Greek school. He justified this by saying he gets a lot of messages from scammers who try take advantage of old, dying relatives (which is an unfortunate but probably accurate characterization of many people), but I'm not quite sure he had enough reason to arrive at this conclusion before he even spoke to me to get into details. I'm sure he's a good attorney, just not a great judge of character.

In my opinion, George is an excellent lawyer. He went a above and beyond for me in 2 separate real…read moreestate transactions. He always allows us to ask him as many questions as we d like without making us feel rushed or guilty. He also is very helpful and patient in explaining complicated language from contracts. I strongly recommend using George for representation.