1. Legacy Home Inspection

    0

    ,

    Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Legacy Home Inspection

    1.0 (2 reviews)
    Closed 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

    Legacy Home Inspection Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Legacy Home Inspection

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Home Inspectors 595 times last month within 25 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Metro Property Inspection

    Metro Property Inspection

    3.0
    (18 reviews)

    We used Metro Property Inspection before purchasing our house and have now found 3 glaring plumbing…read moreissues. These were not documented in the report and never mentioned during the inspection. These issues are so bad that we've had multiple plumbers come out this week and each one is shocked that an inspector didn't catch them. In 3 separate locations we have a small drain pipe from a sink sitting loosely in a larger pipe with no connector or seal. We've had sewer gas coming into the house since the pipes are not properly sealed and water damage that runs down to the basement. After discovering these issues, I consulted their reviews page and found many negative reviews describing major issues missed during inspections. I decided to give Metro a chance to resolve the issue since they commented on some reviews offering to do just that. After describing the issues in detail to the receptionist, I received a callback from the owner who told me he knew nothing about the situation but was calling to answer my " questions about the inspection ". He then proceeded to argue with me the entire call. His main point was that I should have known that when the inspector mentioned replacing one very specific part of the plumbing, that actually meant the entire system. Further, he talked down to me from the beginning but his tone seemed to change once he heard my boyfriend in the background. I can only assume he felt a woman would be easier to belittle. Attached are photos of the plumbing issues that the inspector missed. Do not use this company, you will pay for not only the mediocre inspection but also the issues they miss.

    Our office has used Mike with Metro Property Inspections MANY times and he has always been very…read morethorough, professional, and knowledgeable. He provides information that is helpful to clients and also educates them on home ownership tasks. Pricing is comparable to others I've used also. They provide all inspections needed in a timely manner. When I have questions, he picks up and responds quickly. Thanks!

    Full Service Chimney

    Full Service Chimney

    4.3
    (16 reviews)

    The crew from Full Service Chimney truly is one of the best in the industry. Communication is very…read moreopen, with a highly responsive team, no matter the day/time. It is true that you get what you pay for. While Full Service Chimney might not be the cheapest option, they do a fabulous job with great attention to detail in a timely manner. Thank you to Chris, Shayne, and the rest of the team for a job well done. Now, we just have to wait for the spring rains here in Kansas City to ensure that the repairs alleviated our issue of water coming in the chimney.

    I am sharing my firsthand experience with this business to help other consumers…read more In late April, I hired them to inspect a water leak located where the mantle and tile meet near the fireplace doors. They diagnosed the issue and recommended replacing the chase cover. Based on their expert recommendation, we paid them $2,625 for the replacement. Unfortunately, during a heavy rainfall in early July, the exact same leak returned. We called the company back, and they sent out the same technician. During this second visit, he performed a water isolation test between the siding and shingles. This test successfully proved the leak was coming from that specific area, which I have documented in the attached photos. Looking at the documentation they provided me, a clear contradiction stands out: *First Report: Listed the flashing condition as "Fair" and recommended the $2,625 chase cover. *Second Report: Listed the exact same flashing as "Poor" and resulted in a new quote of $7,100 to fix the actual source of the leak. Because we paid thousands of dollars based on an initial inspection that failed to resolve the issue, I am in the process of filing a formal complaint with the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division. I highly recommend potential customers carefully review my attached, redacted inspection reports and photos before hiring this company. I have attached pictures of the reports and quotes on google. UPDATE: OWNER of full service chimney co., Thank you for your response. I have reviewed call recordings, transcripts, and read your email. Let me be perfectly clear: attempting to deflect accountability by implying a communication disconnect between my husband and me does not alter the physical evidence, your own written reports, or the signed contract. You have explicitly confirmed our case in your own email. You stated: "Our repair technician noticed that once the chase cover was removed, he was able to see from the inside of the chimney that the flashing showed signs of allowing water in." If your repair crew saw active flashing leaks and visible wood rot while the chase cover was off, re-assembling the chimney, taking our $2,625.38, and leaving our home to suffer structural water damage for another two months is the absolute definition of a negligent repair. Furthermore, our signed contract explicitly mandated: "While the chase cover is off, we will inspect the areas we can see around the roofline and flashing for water entry." Your team completely failed that contractual obligation. If they performed a proper inspection as promised, work should have been halted the moment the old cover was removed and the rot was visible. Instead, your company chose to finish an ineffective repair, collect our money, and wait until July to present an outrageous $7,100.85 upsell to fix the actual issue. Pointing to boilerplate fine print about a "1% surface area" to excuse an aggregate failure to stop the leak we hired you to fix is completely unacceptable. We will not be bullied or manipulated into paying $7,100.85 for your company's failure to properly diagnose this in April. As requested in my previous email, provide the line-by-line itemized invoice for the April work and the itemized breakdown for the new quote immediately. We are currently acquiring competitive estimates from licensed roofing and siding professionals in Overland Park, and we have fully initiated our complaint documentation for the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division.

    Legacy Home Inspection - home_inspectors - Updated July 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...