We'd been associated with Legacy since 2011. Initially we were looking for a way to leverage our current financial situation, which was fairly stable and heading in the right direction, into a stable future for the family. Spent a few enjoyable hours with founder, Paul Mauro and company. We're nearly the exact same age, so a lot in common. Main accomplishments were setting up a trust, an investment account and several annuities, designed to bridge the gap between 2011 and retirement about ten years hence.
The performance of the money invested with Legacy was very hard to assess. Partly because annuities have their own way of reporting data - none of which is particularly useful to the annuitant, and partly because the interface to the assets held by Legacy kept changing affiliations. I never understood why that was the case. Paul always had a plausible reason for the change... and a promise of a rosier, data-driven future. There were several such roll-outs, and with each, the promise to be better, faster, easier, more data-rich, yada-yada, than the last.
Fast forward to 2018 and the near the beginning of retirement. We'd done better in the last ten years of my career than predicted. Some of our investments (outside of Legacy) did better than expected. And we inherited some unexpected (and unwanted!) assets from parents. Financially speaking, things had changed. Legacy had yet another, "new" interface to roll-out. This turned out to be the LS ("last straw") interface. Because I was one of the more tech-savvy "squeaky wheels", Legacy used me as a beta site (read: victim) for the roll-out. In my opinion, this "LS" roll-out was a step backwards in terms of visibility and in the way I manage my investment accounts. As a result, we reluctantly decided to migrate assets from Legacy to a different financial entity. It was slow at first - mountains of paperwork - but eventually we moved all the separate and joint accounts for investments and retirement, out of the Legacy domain. That's when things really began to unravel. We were asked to move my mother-in-law's small nest egg of retirement assets from Legacy. Without our assets, hers were too small to qualify for their "practice". Getting answers to questions about that little nest egg took weeks and weeks. Eventually, we simply stopped asking. It is still an issue. And as for the residual of our half a dozen or so annuities, well, we were advised to get in touch with the company holding them rather than dealing through the originator, i.e., Legacy staff. Have you ever tried to learn to speak "annuity"? It is not one language but a mélange of dialects (Jackson National is different than Allianz, is different than Prudential, is different than MA Mutual / Ascend, etc. ). Without the assistance of a friendly advisor (who was no longer very friendly and now an unwilling advisor) to translate, it is almost impossible to decipher. Currently we're in the process of unwinding these annuities on our own. It seems that the money Legacy made from selling these highly profitable financial products was all made at the front end, thus there's no incentive to service the accounts now at the back end. We've been left completely on our own. That applies to my family and the 87 year old mother-in-law!
A parting word of advice to Legacy: it is far less expensive to keep an existing customer than to find a new customer. And now for a bit of introspection: there are some customers you wish upon your competitors. Could I have joined that illustrious group? Perhaps.
So in spite of the cruises in Boston Harbor, the shred-fests, the Christmas holiday celebration, the 50th anniversary celebration, etc., all tangential to the true function of the company (and none of which we'd ever attended), we must drop this review on Legacy. Be cautious. We are a client who went from enthusiastic and grateful to one who is disappointed, jaded, but perhaps a bit wiser. Onward. read more