uh, hello, yelp? did natalie threaten to sue you?? you guys dont need to be reminded that 1) section 230 means youre immune from lawsuits based on other peoples reviews 2) you DONT have to be REPRESENTED BY an attorney to leave a LEGITIMATE poor review: if youre a CHILD and your parent lost custody of one of your young siblings because THE OTHER PARTY'S LAWYER LIED in the courtroom, that lawyer DID NOT represent you, but you are NOT going to recommend that lawyer to any of your friends (and youre going to warn any ethical litigant, though some might like their style and hire them because they DONT have ethics); HEDMAN IS FREE TO SUE ME FOR DEFAMATION if im writing a FALSE review BUT SHE CANT WIN because the only way you can win a defamation suit is if the person writing the review LIES, and EVERYTHING I SAID WAS TRUE: she LIED, MANY TIMES in her litigation against ME, so I very much meet the criteria for writing a review, due to my direct interactions with a business. Or if i had a lousy experience with her or one of her employees at her reception desk, and subsequently DID NOT hire her, I WOULD CERTAINLY have sufficient experience to write a poor review. i filed an ethics complaint against hedman with the oregon bar, and SHE AND THEY are the reason that EVERYONE HATES LAWYERS (perfect example: youre not allowed to leave a review on LAWYER sites, if you did not HIRE the attorney. why? BECAUSE THEYRE ALL CROOKS WHO WATCH EACH OTHERS BACK (see above, about everyone hating lawyers; why do legislators all have so much money? BECAUSE THEYRE ALL LAWYERS, who WRITE LAWS TO SET THEIR OWN PAY. and they also regulate their own INSIDER TRADING); the ethics complaint is public, it very meticulously details all of her lies, and i highly recommend anyone considering hiring her, to read my complaint: i am a college flunk-out JANITOR, and the ONLY WAY she could beat me was by LYING, this is a COMPLETELY LEGITIMATE REVIEW, as are the other one-star reviews read more