Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Great Companion Dog Training

    5.0 (1 review)
    Closed 8:00 am - 8:00 pm

    Services - Great Companion Dog Training

    Pet breeders

    Private dog training

    Great Companion Dog Training Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Great Companion Dog Training

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    6 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Great Companion Dog Training

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Pet Training 1,978 times last month within 15 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Saving Paws Rescue, Az - Harley (Taffy) at 5 weeks!

    Saving Paws Rescue, Az

    (38 reviews)

    I made a one time donation to Saving the Paws and they continue to charge my account $29.99 every…read moremonth, without my authorization. I have sent several emails and left a VM message asking them to correct the error. I have received no reply from them. I now have to close out my account to stop the charges. Very unprofessional!!! UPDATE 2/6/26: I have been informed that there is a fraudulent website using the Saving the Paws name to scam people out of money. The legitimate Saving the Paws had nothing to do with my issue above. My apologies to the real Saving the Paws organization.

    Saving Paws Rescue has knowingly been operating a dog rescue for years without a Certificate of…read moreOccupancy (CO). As of April 2026 they had NO CO. You can call Maricopa County to verify when, or if, they received a CO. What does it say about a dog rescue that knowingly operates without a Certificate of Occupancy? If you are supporting this rescue, you are supporting potential illegal, unethical, and immoral administration. Operating a dog rescue without a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is a multi-layered issue that cuts across legal, ethical, and practical boundaries. Whether it demonstrates a fundamental lack of ethics, morals, and character depends heavily on the intent, awareness, and underlying conditions of the operation. Here is a breakdown of how this situation is generally evaluated through the lenses of law, ethics, and animal welfare. 1. The Legal and Safety Dimension A Certificate of Occupancy isn't just a bureaucratic piece of paper; it is a legal document certifying that a building complies with local zoning laws, building codes, and safety regulations. Public and Animal Safety: For a dog rescue, CO requirements typically ensure proper ventilation, safe electrical wiring (to prevent fires), adequate waste disposal, and structural integrity. Operating without one means the facility has bypassed inspections meant to guarantee the physical safety of both the human caretakers and the animals. Zoning Compliance: Municipalities use COs to ensure that high-density animal facilities aren't operating in areas where they might create public health hazards, noise violations, or environmental issues (like waste runoff). From a strict regulatory standpoint, operating without a CO is a violation of local law, and knowingly doing so demonstrates a disregard for municipal governance and community standards. 2. The Ethical Framework: Intent vs. Impact When evaluating the "ethics and character" of the operators, the situation usually falls into one of two distinct categories: Case A: The Ignorant or Resource-Strapped Rescuer (Ethical Oversight) Many independent animal rescuers are driven by deep empathy and a desire to save lives. They often step in during crises when local municipal shelters are overflowing. The Scenario: A passionate individual starts taking in dogs, unaware of complex commercial zoning laws, or they occupy a building thinking it is "good enough" while pouring all available funds directly into veterinary care and food. Character Assessment: While legally negligent, this is often viewed as a failure of administrative competence rather than a lack of morals. The intent is altruistic, though the execution carries significant risk. Case B: The Wilful Bypasser (Ethical Failure) When an operator knowingly and intentionally avoids obtaining a CO, the ethical assessment changes dramatically. The Scenario: The operator avoids inspection because they know the facility fails basic health and safety standards, exceeds legal animal capacity limits, or violates local zoning (e.g., operating a massive kennel in a quiet residential zone). They choose to hide from the county or city to avoid the cost of compliance. Character Assessment: This demonstrates a clear compromise in ethics. By dodging inspections, the operator prioritizes their own operational convenience over the safety of the animals, the rights of the surrounding neighborhood, and the law. 3. The Animal Welfare Paradox The highest ethical duty of any rescue is the well-being of the animals in its care. Operating an uncertified facility creates a dangerous paradox: The Risk of Good Intentions: A rescue operating outside the system lacks oversight. Without official capacity limits and structural checks, these environments are highly susceptible to "rescue hoarding"--where the volume of animals outpaces the physical infrastructure, leading to poor sanitation, disease outbreaks, noise pollution, and severe stress for the dogs. If an organization claims to protect animals but houses them in a facility that hasn't been verified as safe or sanitary by local health and building codes, their actions contradict their stated mission. The Takeaway If the omission is accidental or due to a misunderstanding of local ordinances, it highlights a need for better administrative guidance. However, if an operator deliberately hides the operation, ignores stop-work or cease-and-desist orders, or refuses to bring a building up to code, it reflects a significant ethical failure. In those cases, it demonstrates a willingness to cut corners at the expense of compliance, community peace, and ultimately, the very safety of the animals they claim to protect.

    Animal Medical Center of Deer Valley

    Animal Medical Center of Deer Valley

    (43 reviews)

    I want to preface this feedback with we absolutely love the vets here and have been bringing our 3…read morecats here religiously for the past 4 years. We brought our cat Bandit in for a routine annual wellness exam because it's required for us to continue purchasing his medication through you. We have spent thousands of dollars on medication for Bandit over the past 2 years through you. I requested for a blood test during the exam because he needs his kidney's checked for his restrictive cardiomyopathy and had his 6 month check up next week with his cardiologist. I even mentioned to Ashley, our tech, that I liked getting it done with you because it's much cheaper than at the cardiologist. Dr. Lee mentioned Bandit could have pancreatitis, due to the fact I said he had been drinking more water lately. He said they could check for pancreatitis with the blood test. I am very frustrated by the fact it was not relayed to me that it would be roughly $200 more for that test. For an annual exam, urine specimen, and blood test... I was not expecting it would be $470. $200 more than what I paid last year? I end up spending $500 at the cardiologist every 6 months for his echo, so a "$1000 spend on my cat in a week" realization wasn't fun. Amanda (I'm assuming it was her when I spoke with her on the phone and recognized her voice) said lab prices have increased and that checking for pancreatitis cost more. I told her my feedback is being more transparent about pricing, because I was honestly shocked at that price. And I never said I wanted a full senior work up for his blood test. To add to the experience, a very rude man was yelling at one of the front desk assistants when I was trying to pay. He was frustrated because the front desk did not communicate that their appt was going to be delayed due to an emergency appt coming in. Another example of poor communication from staff. Because of Bandit's heart condition I hate to sever this relationship, because you are 2 mins away and it's very convenient for medication, and I truly love most of the staff. This, unfortunately, left such a horrible impression for me.

    Everyone was so sweet. And super helpful. The advice they gave was very easy to understand and…read morefollow. I love this place. I wish I could take them with me on my move. It's a difficult if not impossible place to duplicate

    Great Companion Dog Training - pet_training - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...