Cancel

    Search

    Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C.

    4.6 (48 reviews)
    Closed • 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

    Request a consultation

    You can now request a consultation from this business directly from Yelp

    Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C. Photos

    Recommended Reviews - Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C.

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.

    7 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    11 months ago

    Business owner information

    Photo of Daniel P.

    Daniel P.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of V P.
    0
    5
    1

    1 year ago

    Business owner information

    Photo of Daniel P.

    Daniel P.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    1 year ago

    I really liked how easy it was to speak with Daniel. He was very kind and knowledgeable in regards to any questions I had.

    Business owner information

    Photo of Daniel P.

    Daniel P.

    Thank you, Dianne. I was happy to help.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 7
    Thanks 2
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Sarah G.
    261
    14
    1

    4 years ago

    Helpful 10
    Thanks 1
    Love this 2
    Oh no 1

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1
    Photo of Ron M.
    1
    276
    42

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Ginny F.
    1
    153
    47

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Daniel Prince called online request I set paperwork 3 weeks ago, many i calls, no response at all. Very unprofessional

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 1
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Mark J.
    65
    18
    0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    6 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Jill T.
    5
    177
    9

    9 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Thao H.
    18
    18
    16

    7 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    13 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    15 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of J S.
    0
    4
    0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of M P.
    0
    61
    24

    10 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Wendy Z.
    12
    36
    13

    14 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of David C.
    16
    256
    8

    13 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of K B.
    0
    1
    0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    12 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    11 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Page 1 of 2

    Ask the Community - Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C.

    Does this attorney do probate litigation?

    Sorry, no.

    View All 2 Questions

    Review Highlights - Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C.

    “Daniel Printz has been instrumental in helping our family understand our options and develop a plan on how best to proceed.”

    Mentioned in 11 reviews

    Read more highlights

    Tresp Law, APC - Our full team of experts!

    Tresp Law, APC

    (10 reviews)

    Thank you for helping walk us through the basics of what we need to set up trusts for the kiddos…read moreand holding our hand each step of the way. Elizabeth, thank your for all you do and we will look forward to working with you in the future. Like others in North County, we work very hard and want to make sure we "keep what we earn" - thank you for making this as painless as possible. I'm reminded about the old adage, "nobody wants a lawyer until they NEED one" .. so glad we found you close to home at the right time. Please thank your staff and Brian and we'll see you soon. Truly, Jim

    Tresp Law File No. 23-01791…read more After approximately three years of representation, the mineral deed issue became the final straw in Plaintiff's dissatisfaction with Tresp Law. Under the settlement, Defendants were responsible for causing one-half of a specified royalty interest to be transferred to Plaintiff. Tresp Law stepped in and represented that it could handle the deed preparation more quickly and less expensively than if Defendants continued handling it themselves. Tresp Law then spent months researching, preparing, and recording the deed, and Plaintiff paid the firm for that work. The deed was recorded on February 24, 2026. Plaintiff terminated the attorney-client relationship on March 4, 2026. Tresp Law itself acknowledges that the deed work was performed while it represented Plaintiff and that the purpose of that work was to carry out the transfer required by the settlement. After the representation ended, the operator responsible for administering the royalty interest advised that problems existed with the deed and that corrective documentation was required before the interest could be properly divided. Plaintiff requested a refund of the deed-preparation fees. Tresp Law refused. In its August 26, 2026 response, the firm stated that the deed had "conveyed to you an undivided one-half interest, as the Settlement Agreement contemplated," despite the operator's determination that corrective documentation was required. Tresp Law's position appears to be that because it researched, prepared, and recorded a deed, the work was "performed and completed." Plaintiff's position is very different: the firm was paid to prepare a legal instrument that accomplished a specific transfer, not merely to produce and record a document. For Plaintiff, Tresp Law's refusal to refund the fees or otherwise accept responsibility for a deed that required corrective work represents a refusal to stand behind the result of its own legal work. This review addresses only the mineral deed issue. There is considerably more to Plaintiff's three-year experience with Tresp Law. Additional video reviews addressing specific communications, billing issues, litigation decisions, and supporting documents will be published on various social media platforms so viewers can review the record and reach their own conclusions. One of Plaintiff's broader frustrations with Tresp Law was the distinction between work being performed and the case actually moving forward. Plaintiff often felt that tasks were completed, time was billed, and invoices were generated without a corresponding sense that the litigation had materially advanced. In Plaintiff's opinion, a client should not confuse activity with progress. And perhaps that is the larger point. If Tresp Law devoted as much energy to efficient, careful, results-oriented work for its clients as Plaintiff believes it devotes to disputing or attempting to remove unfavorable public reviews, Plaintiff's experience with the firm might have been very different. In Plaintiff's opinion, a law firm's reputation is better protected by the quality of its work than by trying to control criticism of that work. Plaintiff is prepared to post the relevant emails, invoices, recorded deed, operator correspondence, and other supporting documentation so readers can review the underlying record for themselves and reach their own conclusions.

    Daniel K. Printz, A.P.C. - willstrustsprobates - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...