Cancel

    Search

    Worden Williams

    3.7 (3 reviews)
    Open • 8:30 am - 5:00 pm

    Request a consultation

    You can now request a consultation from this business directly from Yelp

    Services - Worden Williams

    Estate planning

    Business litigation

    Real estate law

    Worden Williams Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Worden Williams

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Worden Williams

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Estate Planning Law 606 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Ratner & Pinchman - Ratner & Pinchman

    Ratner & Pinchman

    (45 reviews)

    Carmel Valley

    Miss Pinchman was a joy to meet with. On top of it in a great office. We put a pin in any project…read morewe had moving forward but would absolutely consider her for business should I need her moving forward.

    In my experience, Maya Pinchman is an exceptional attorney. I found her to be thoroughly…read moreknowledgeable and directly involved. She is personable and her response time is excellent. Maya Pinchman was the attorney who executed the estate planning for a close friend of mine. This friend eventually moved to a nursing facility due to health and aging issues. When my friend became physically incapacitated, she asked if I would function as her advocate and POA. She instructed Maya to oversee the requisite paperwork. Since my appointment, my friend has had billing and/or funding issues arise with Medicare, Medicaid, and/or Medi-Cal, especially when temporarily hospitalized. This can be very disconcerting to lay people unfamiliar with the process. Maya has navigated us through rules and regulations relieving stress and providing assurance for financial security. Additionally, as regulations have changed regarding Trust and personal assets, Maya has timely advised us and professionally managed these changes to meet the requirements of the law. Maya has been a godsend providing invaluable legal service and a caring resource. I recommend her with the highest degree of confidence you will be equally as satisfied.

    Tresp Law, APC - Our full team of experts!

    Tresp Law, APC

    (10 reviews)

    Thank you for helping walk us through the basics of what we need to set up trusts for the kiddos…read moreand holding our hand each step of the way. Elizabeth, thank your for all you do and we will look forward to working with you in the future. Like others in North County, we work very hard and want to make sure we "keep what we earn" - thank you for making this as painless as possible. I'm reminded about the old adage, "nobody wants a lawyer until they NEED one" .. so glad we found you close to home at the right time. Please thank your staff and Brian and we'll see you soon. Truly, Jim

    Tresp Law File No. 23-01791…read more After approximately three years of representation, the mineral deed issue became the final straw in Plaintiff's dissatisfaction with Tresp Law. Under the settlement, Defendants were responsible for causing one-half of a specified royalty interest to be transferred to Plaintiff. Tresp Law stepped in and represented that it could handle the deed preparation more quickly and less expensively than if Defendants continued handling it themselves. Tresp Law then spent months researching, preparing, and recording the deed, and Plaintiff paid the firm for that work. The deed was recorded on February 24, 2026. Plaintiff terminated the attorney-client relationship on March 4, 2026. Tresp Law itself acknowledges that the deed work was performed while it represented Plaintiff and that the purpose of that work was to carry out the transfer required by the settlement. After the representation ended, the operator responsible for administering the royalty interest advised that problems existed with the deed and that corrective documentation was required before the interest could be properly divided. Plaintiff requested a refund of the deed-preparation fees. Tresp Law refused. In its August 26, 2026 response, the firm stated that the deed had "conveyed to you an undivided one-half interest, as the Settlement Agreement contemplated," despite the operator's determination that corrective documentation was required. Tresp Law's position appears to be that because it researched, prepared, and recorded a deed, the work was "performed and completed." Plaintiff's position is very different: the firm was paid to prepare a legal instrument that accomplished a specific transfer, not merely to produce and record a document. For Plaintiff, Tresp Law's refusal to refund the fees or otherwise accept responsibility for a deed that required corrective work represents a refusal to stand behind the result of its own legal work. This review addresses only the mineral deed issue. There is considerably more to Plaintiff's three-year experience with Tresp Law. Additional video reviews addressing specific communications, billing issues, litigation decisions, and supporting documents will be published on various social media platforms so viewers can review the record and reach their own conclusions. One of Plaintiff's broader frustrations with Tresp Law was the distinction between work being performed and the case actually moving forward. Plaintiff often felt that tasks were completed, time was billed, and invoices were generated without a corresponding sense that the litigation had materially advanced. In Plaintiff's opinion, a client should not confuse activity with progress. And perhaps that is the larger point. If Tresp Law devoted as much energy to efficient, careful, results-oriented work for its clients as Plaintiff believes it devotes to disputing or attempting to remove unfavorable public reviews, Plaintiff's experience with the firm might have been very different. In Plaintiff's opinion, a law firm's reputation is better protected by the quality of its work than by trying to control criticism of that work. Plaintiff is prepared to post the relevant emails, invoices, recorded deed, operator correspondence, and other supporting documentation so readers can review the underlying record for themselves and reach their own conclusions.

    Worden Williams - estateplanning - Updated September 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...