I wish that I had checked the reviews before reaching out to these people.
My experience with this firm was a clear demonstration of the arrogance, lack of professionalism and disrespect that they display towards the general public who is foolish enough to pay for a consult from them:
My personal belief is that it was unethical to have me pay a $400 consultation fee and have to leave work early to meet with Carlo De Oliviera, only to be handed off to the very person that I wanted nothing to do with, Philip Steck. I specifically reached out to see Carlo De Oliviera. As he is also a member of Assembly, I can truly state that every time I have had the displeasure of meeting with Mr. Steck, it has been a negative experience, due to his nasty, dismissive, disrespectful disposition. He doesn't remember me, but I definitely remember each and every miserable encounter.
Unsurprisingly to me, this time was no different. Never before have ever I had to stop a meeting to request that the host of said meeting, conduct themselves appropriately, and address me with the respect that I am providing to them. But I guess that there is a first time for everything, including paying for a consult, but only to leave with a feeling of being abused and duped.
I describe the experience as such because, for the most part the rest of the meeting consisted of Mr. Steck, both repeatedly and condescendingly, reminding me that I "am not an attorney", complain about the level of detail I provided in my complaint (EEOC and NYS DHR had no problem with it), complain about his having to actually READ my complaint, trying to discourage me by stating how expensive it will be for him to represent me since "racial discrimination is difficult to prove", despite that being only one of the numerous categories of discrimination that I described within my complaint. However, that was the very one that he took issue with. As a Black woman, why would I ever want such a person to represent me in such sensitive matters?
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. After paying $400, I received a bill for roughly $1,500. When I questioned it, he was annoyed and told me that it was a typo, asked the date of my hearing once again (it was that week), replied that he was not available, reminded me that it was going to cost me at least $20k to start, then accused me of not providing him the same information already provided (yes, the stuff he complained about having to read) in a timeline format. By then, I had already moved on to a respectable firm. read more