Whenever we do business with anyone, I normally use several social apps to help guide us in the right direction and avoid any places with bad business practices. Unfortunately in this case, we didn't have the luxury since our loved one was suffering and needed immediate attention. Our cat, Pedro, was mauled by the neighbor's dog. Anyways, as with any time a loved one is hurt or suffering, we're emotionally and financially vulnerable. I believe this business not only took advantage of that, but made errors during the process and altered their treatment plan to change the estimate without ever being fully transparent with us in hopes they could maximize profits.
We submitted Pedro Saturday afternoon after the attack, surgery was set for Sunday and was to be released Monday morning. The initial estimate received was to clean the wounds, perform minor surgery, and provide treatment. This totaled a whopping $1400 (low end)/$1550(high). Due to the nature of the situation, timing, and business (24 hr weekend service), we understood this was high - but it was to save Pedro's life. We went with it and was told that they would begin working on him. We contacted them later that night and was told his wounds were cleaned and stitched up and he was stable. Without hearing an update on his procedure the following day at 2pm, we decided to reach out to check up on him. We're told that amputation will have to be done on one of his legs, and that we were already "nearing" our full estimate (after 1 night spent). The Dr. giving us their professional advice, wasn't the Dr. who we were originally working with and the one who was wasn't available Sunday to perform the surgery as planned (why are we paying the inflated ER express price again?).
So with all of this said, we were painted a bad picture for Pedro and that amputation seems to be the only route we had left. Over the phone, we accepted the new estimate which was an additional $1900 to $3100. This estimate was to cover the amputation and any additional supplies and hours needed for treatment (still Monday release). The very next day we get a phone call from his original Dr.(Dr. Valles), telling me how could the other Dr. could even give their professional opinion without even removing the bandages (bandages weren't removed on Sunday, as promised and paid for; this leads me to think what else was not done). Furthermore, she said that not only did we have $500 left from the initial estimate, that she spoke with another Dr. that amputation wasn't required and that we should keep Pedro sedated and on meds for the rest of the day and release him to her the following morning (Tuesday). Of the $500 that was left from the initial estimate, Dr. Kaschenbach wanted another xray and blood work to be done prior to taking transition from Dr. Valles. As for the $1900 being charged for the second esitimate, we were told we would get refunded a majority of that back due to them not performing the surgery.
Of course, after hearing this, all of it was great news until we went to pick up Pedro and the bill that accompanied him. I immediately sparked a conversation with Dr. Holms (Dr on duty) and the other techs (Kevin and Nicole), which no one could figure out the bill. Even though $700 was refunded, $1200 remained and was billed for the extra day he was there. This is where it gets really misleading. Per the bill and Dr Valles, minor surgery wasn't performed until Monday morning (no one wanted to tell me that; and was very hesitant). This is what believes me to think the amputation conversation was used to extract more money to supplement the first estimate. I told them up front that money was extremely tight and that we simply couldn't afford it. So putting a more favorable figure of $1400, instead of $2600 (which is what his minor surgery cost). I caution anyone to go here, be sure to get everything in writing and nothing over the phone! Their "details" are very vague (e.g., surgery; could be cleaning wounds or amputation). read more