Zio Ziegler, Untitled, June 2015
Private money funds a Zio Ziegler mural, Untitled (2015), on the renowned Cathedral Building while Oakland is referred to as the new up and coming with a happening art scene that is true to few currently residing in the city. Ziegler's brightly colored mural cannot be missed as it can be seen from blocks away. While the mural has no visible correlation with the residence or events (current or historical) in Oakland it is a crowd favorite among the new comers to the city. This new mural seems to have made its mark on Oakland and sets a tone for the future of murals and culture of Oakland.
To begin, the historic gothic style revival Cathedral Building sits at the intersection of Telegraph and Broadway, which are two of the busiest streets in Oakland. Built in 1914, it is unlikely that anyone has come close to gaining permission to paint a mural on the side of it, until the United Nation (UN) Foundation commissioned Ziegler to create a mural in order to commemorate the UN's seventeenth anniversary. The UN "...wanted to partner with a local artist to create a mural, paintings, and merchandise based on its new global goals that are also a focus of the celebration."i Originally, the mural was planned to execute the mural on a building near San Francisco's War Memorial Opera House, which is the location of the 1945 signing of the UN Charter, but after talk of Oakland's "exploding art scene" the mural was decided to be done in Oakland.ii This is interesting considering the current socioeconomics in Oakland UN's goals of the mural to address and tackle extreme poverty and climate change. "People our age are relatively disconnected with the UN, and I think it could be very relevant again," said Ziegler in a recent interview, "But it would take an encouragement of something graphically intriguing enough so that someone would actually want to participate, wear it, endorse it, share it." i
When walking down Telegraph I can see the mural perfectly from four blocks away, I can only imagine how many people are looking at the mural at the same time, or how many view it in a day. The mural is viewable from other nearby buildings, ones that are smaller and ones that are just as tall. When standing at the foot of the Cathedral building one is overwhelmed by scale of the mural. This elevation is a signifier for dominance. One must have the money to commission a piece of artwork that not only takes up surface space but is viewable from a far and wide range. The mural is larger than many murals in the city; the mural is higher than many murals in the city, but s the mural in fact better? Disregarding the lack of content, the mural is quite grand. Ziegler's signature is easily legible from the end of the block, although new residents, predominantly young white members of the middle class, don't seem to have a hard time identifying the artist on their own. Oakland, having collected a significant but branded Ziegler mural, has begun to appropriate it into its expanding but limited public art space.
Murals should be executed, if not by a member(s) of the community, with involvement from members. Ziegler is a Marin County native. Marin has the fifth highest income per capita in the United States. "The seated figure and birds that it depicts have a personal meaning to Ziegler, but he often prefers that his paintings be left to interpretation."i Contrary to other exiting murals in Oakland, Ziegler's inspirations driving his artwork are greatly different from the inspirations driving artists who grew up in Oakland experiencing protest and discrimination.
The mural simply has nothing to do with the past or current state of Oakland other than what artwork is trending as Oakland becomes more gentrified. Because this mural was privately funded no members or residents of the public had any say on what would be depicted on the mural, the space was offered to Ziegler to make an attempt at communicating the UN's goals in his own artistic style. The content of the mural being a reflection of the art works funders makes me think of Erin Sickler's Art and the 99%, when reading this I was admirable of Occupy's aims to expose the role of board members and fiscal sponsors, who are members of the 1%, role in determining the programming and administration of cultural institutions. How can institutions call themselves "cultural centers" if the people making all the decisions are members of the very small, non-diverse 1%.iii Compared to Oakland, the increasing amount of newer residents have less, if any, longstanding ties with the city, therefore a meaningless mural by an artist that has recently been receiving much praise for his "street art" is appropriate. read more