It's hard to be as evil and manipulative as the representatives for Stanford University - to say the VERY least. Considering I am THE Kerry Moynihan - the notorious radical feminist revolutionary and scientist who is known to have severely wounded both Academia and the Medical Industry with my work to combat the Hormone Replacement Therapy Industry - I think I am the best person to speak on the political activities of such institutions.
Political figures who represent this institution, such as Dr. Andrew Huberman, Dr. Peter Attia, Dr. Karl Deisseroth, or Mr. Alex Rodriguez, are operating under the guise that they are "helping" millions and billions of people across the globe by giving them "longevity" and "biohacking" tips on podcasts for "free". These men have assisted the empire that is the Medical Industry in profitting off people around the world by causing them to come down with chronic and life-threatening diseases like cancer and ALS. Simultaneously, the optogenetics implant has been utilized to psychologically conquer each and every member of the human race on a global scale. Such activities, of course, are enacted to not just accumulate psychological control, but also to accumulate a profit - particularly in the millions and billions of dollars. Deisseroth and Huberman specifically (with Attia being a possible affiliate) have conducted experiments with optogenetics to see how well they can control the behavior of a mouse (i.e. getting the mouse to run around a maze). Such psychological control is intended to eventually be applicable to humans - and particularly on those who are already reliant on the Medical Industry for their physiological and psychological well-being, such as cancer and ALS patients.
Nevermind the fact that women are being funneled into Stanford University and other academic and medical institutions for engaging in transactional sex with Deisseroth (a married man to Michelle Monje, PhD/MD of Stanford), Attia (another married man to Jill Attia), Huberman, Rodriguez, and their allies. Doing this is not only sexually exploiting women, but is ALSO a direct violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Let's review what these representatives of Stanford University have violated legally:
Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972:
"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance." Although it is a private institution, Stanford University still receives a significant portion of its funds from the taxpayer - at the federal (i.e. the National Institute of Health), the state, and the local level. This means that Stanford University is using the dollars of taxpayers to grant both educational and employment opportunities to people in subordinate positions - who are, usually, women - who engage in transactional sex with those in high-ranking positions - usually, men - for those educational and employment opportunities. Stanford University is breaking the law.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
The law "strictly prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), and national origin. It applies to employers with 15 or more employees."
It is worth addressing that, once more, Stanford University is a private institution in which the funds they receive from the taxpayer do not constitute the entirety of the funds they receive for applied research and healthcare. Simply receiving fewer funds for applied research and healthcare than a public institution does NOT mean that Stanford - or any of the allies of these representatives - is somehow immune to following federal, state, and local laws and not using valuable taxpayer money for such insidious political activities. It doesn't matter if a woman like Michelle Monje, PhD/MD "participated in transactional sex" for her employment at Stanford University "consensually", which is what her husband - Karl Deisseroth - has been repeatedly claiming to his millions of supporters around the world. It's against the law to participate in transactional sex not just for degrees, but ALSO for employment opportunities - and REGARDLESS of whether you are the individual receiving the resource or giving the resource. read more