Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Services - SoundLaw Office

    Business litigation

    IP and internet litigation

    SoundLaw Office Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - SoundLaw Office

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    13 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - SoundLaw Office

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for Business Law 441 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Haas Law

    Haas Law

    (13 reviews)

    Pioneer Square

    Lots of great reviews but honestly i think they were there just for the money or just hugely NOT…read morecompetent at all. I had an issues with an insurance claim, them denying my claim even though they couldn't prove they weren't liable. I was very clear from the start that my moving company made the insurance with the insurance company and that I did not have any documentation regarding the Pick-Up but only regarding my Drop-Off. 1. Phone consultation with Maureen, of course she can't predict the outcome but the consultation was quite specific as to know if there was a strong case, which she said there was, she also said the proof of being liable or not, was on the insurance company side that's why they have investigators. 2. Philip Haas calls, I find out that Maureen is not my lawyer but he will be, never spoke to him before and with a non-disclosed speech impediment that makes communication hugely hard (first bad sign, she should have contacted me telling me and asking if that was ok before taking a non refundable deposit). 3. You would think that if you change your clients lawyer without consulting with the client you'd provide every bit of information that very client provided you; NO, not the case, Philip Haas started doing his own without even consulting first and knowing half of the case; I got mad and made him aware of it and he apologized saying Maureen didn't send him the info (hugely unprofessional and once again a very bad sign); because I did send details by email there were no way you could dispute it so he wrote off what he charged me so far with whatever he did without consulting me first and then made out a strategy plan with me starting from zero (that was well appreciated but not encouraging). 4. If you know the case and set up a strategy but then a month later forget about details regarding that case...VERY BAD SIGN. Philip Haas blamed it on the fact they just had a new born and thanked me for reminding him the details of my case and because of that now he would re-contact the insurance company (he should have done that immediately as soon as he got another "claim denied"). 5. Out of the blue turns out that the burden of proof that the insurance company is liable or not, is on me and not on the insurance company so even though the insurance company can't prove they aren't liable, I have to prove they are by providing documents of the truck and driver that did my pick-up... SURPRISE! So my lawyer knowing from the start I did not have any documents alike as I specified from the beginning with Maureen, at the very end let's me know I have the burden of proof which, not having documents is clear that there is no case at all then, that's just common sense right? ... can you prove in a very specific way who the driver and truck type is? NO, you don't have a case, so why on earth would you take a case knowing there is no case? Because you mislead and was there for the money OR just were hugely incompetent not knowing what you were doing. Philip Haas insists they didn't mislead, which can be true but that just means they were hugely incompetent then, which one is it? A. The insurance company have to prove they are not liable and if they can't the burden for compensation is on them at least partially. (Maureen) -" knowing I didn't have documentation to prove specifics regarding the pick-up driver and truck type. Or B. You have to prove the insurance company is liable (even though you were insured) in order for them to compensate you by providing documents of who the driver and truck type was (Philip) Both are contradicting each other and therefore misleading or simply pure incompetence in the matter. Federal court? That was an option it would just have been hugely costly and time consuming and no guarantee of anythings pf course. Bad experience and a huge waste of money!

    Wonderful experience It was absolutely a pleasure working…read morewith Haas Law. They took their time explaining everything in detail. I would definitely recommend using them as your lawyer.

    Peterson Law

    Peterson Law

    (14 reviews)

    I found Bryn Peterson on Yelp about 2.5 years ago when my partner and I were dealing with some…read morestressful business legal issues, and I still remember our very first consultation call clearly. We were overwhelmed, anxious, dealing with a complete liar and juggling a lot at the time. Bryn took the time to truly listen, asked thoughtful questions, and immediately made us feel supported and understood. When we met in person, he was nothing but professional, kind, and--somehow--even managed to make us laugh during a very difficult situation. Throughout our time working with him, Bryn's emails were always detailed, clear, and extremely effective. He consistently shut down nonsense and misinformation from the other side with precision and confidence. Comparing the professionalism and substance of Bryn's work to what the opposing counsel produced made it crystal clear that we made the right decision trusting him with our legal needs! Bryn isn't just an excellent attorney--he's a genuinely good person. He's a family man, a great dad, and it shows in how deeply he cares about his clients. He treats you like a human being, not just a case. When our situation unfortunately escalated into a lawsuit, Bryn recommended an outstanding litigation firm, which ultimately helped us win. That recommendation alone speaks volumes about his integrity and experience. I cannot recommend Bryn highly enough for business legal matters. He is smart, ethical, responsive, and absolutely worth the time and money. His paralegal, Kelly, is also wonderful to work with--professional, helpful, and kind. Bryn truly has a great thing going, and I will always be incredibly grateful we found him.

    The consultation call with Bryn was pretty useless - felt like a huge waste of time for us. Vague…read moreanswers, and seemed reluctant to get into much details - even to explain the process! ‍.. Whole bunch of rhetorical questions and "what do you think"s!! Ended up saying "my time is money" during the "free consultation" call - what a ridiculous statement to make to a prospective client! I'd suggest not offering free consultations with that attitude!

    SoundLaw Office - businesslawyers - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...