I would caution anyone considering going to Dr. Krosin for surgery due to his demonstrated negligence in my surgery.
I went to Dr. Krosin to have painful hardware removed from my ankle. During the surgery to remove the hardware, one of the screws broke. This is very common, and there specifically exists something called a "broken screw removal kit" for instances like these. Dr. Krosin did not have a broken screw removal kit on hand, which, in my opinion, is negligent given that screws commonly break and according to what I've read, these kits should be in present in every OR for hardware removal surgeries. Instead, there was not one available and they told me it was "in use in another operating room." Thus, Dr. Krosin completed the surgery leaving behind a moderately large broken (about 1.5 inches long) screw in my ankle. He said at the time that it was no big deal and that he would be "shocked" if it caused any issues --but I was later advised by 4 other doctors, including another orthopedic surgeon and an allergist, to have the remaining broken screw removed.
I had a pre-existing nickel allergy, and the hardware metal contained nickel. Initially, Dr. Krosin had been supportive of the hardware removal. He now says "While there are tests available for nickel allergies, such as a patch test, these do not prove systemic problems for the offending allergen. They may show skin irritation, but that does not mean the patient will have deep tissue irritation." (I'm a research scientist working in the health sector, and this is surprising news to me that allergens affect the surface layer of skin only and nothing else....lol).
Advised by other doctors, I had a third surgery to remove the broken screw, all because Dr. Krosin did not have the necessary and basic tools for my prior surgery. During the third surgery, the broken screw easily came out since my new surgeon had a broken screw removal kit (he was super sweet about it and reassured me multiple times that his office values following all standards of care).
I tried to resolve this issue privately with Dr. Krosin, and he refused to offer any kind of amelioration. Because of that I began the first steps of filing a medical malpractice case in small claims court; I asked for $6K to make up for my lost wages during time off after the third surgery. I was not trying to bleed him dry or make some kind of profit, just seeking some compensation because of how much stress this lost income caused, when I strongly believe it could have been prevented if he'd had the proper tools on hand. He responded denying my request and said "If you decide to pursue this matter in a small claims case, I would be required to defend my professional reputation and seek costs associated with my legal defense as well as any damages resulting from harm caused by you making such a claim."
I find it disturbing that he would rather threaten me than privately pay $6,000, an amount that he probably makes in 3 days or something, as compensation for his negligence.
He also stated, "Our expert as well as the treating physician has opined that breaking a screw during removal or leaving a broken screw fragment in the body because it cannot be removed does happen, even in the absence of negligence." So... does that mean surgical negligence is okay as long as the mistake 'could have happened even if [they] weren't being negligent'?!?
The obvious hole in that line of logic is around the REASON the hardware couldn't be removed. If the reason the screw couldn't be removed were not due to negligence but due to something we had discussed, like the screw being impossible to reach without causing too much tissue damage, I would have accepted it. But what we didn't discuss is the possibility that the hardware wouldn't get removed due to them not having the required tools on hand, sanitized, and ready to go during the time of the surgery. Since the tool wasn't present, they should've checked and known that before cutting my leg open, and rescheduled my surgery for a time when they had all the required tools available.
In all I would not recommend this doctor. If he is not being negligent or vindictive, I believe he could be a great surgeon-- but those two attributes that I have experienced with him are highly concerning to me in a doctor and are enough for me to say that you should strongly consider going elsewhere for your surgery. If he had been apologetic, taken any ounce of accountability, or offered to correct the mistake instead of being dismissive about the negligence at the onset, I might not have even thought to seek compensation, but the way he handled the whole thing was in my opinion dismissive, invalidating, threatening, and mean. I'm concerned about the medical ethics of any doctor who believes performing surgery without necessary equipment is excusable, and who then implies HE'S the victim of harm to his reputation when patients seek reasonable compensation for this negligence. read more