Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    I-505 Highway

    4.7 (3 reviews)

    I-505 Highway Photos

    Recommended Reviews - I-505 Highway

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    9 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Amy S.
    1117
    2421
    20491

    13 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    12 years ago

    Helpful 5
    Thanks 0
    Love this 8
    Oh no 0

    Verify this business for free

    Get access to customer & competitor insights.

    Verify this business

    Yolo County Superior Court - Judge Donna M Petre.

    Yolo County Superior Court

    2.5(33 reviews)
    10.9 mi

    They need to update their business hours. Made me drive two hours because it said they were open…read more Turns out they were closed.

    1. Judge Timothy Fall made several erroneous rulings that greatly prejudiced Ms. Zhou, such as…read morefailing to amend the minute order, hastily dismissing the opponent with prejudice at an unwarranted ex parte hearing without considering the timely filed first amended complaint, and denying Ms. Zhou the opportunity to reverse these incorrect rulings through an ex parte hearing before another judge. 2. Judge Samuel McAdams unjustly thwarted the reversal of Judge Fall's erroneous rulings by staying Ms. Zhou's "motion to vacate" for 87 days without a valid reason, resulting in the motion being excluded from the mandatory 75-day ruling window. 3. Judge Stephen Mock, without considering the merits of the case or the pending motions, unjustly ordered Ms. Zhou to pay $45,000 in attorney's fees within 2 months, disregarding the fact that the defendant cited an outdated agreement to obtain the fees. Judge Mock then disqualified himself pursuant to CCP section 170.1 after refusing to allow the first amended complaint to stand. 4. When Ms. Zhou challenged Judge Mock's unjust attorney's fee ruling, Judge McAdams disregarded the case's merits and stayed the case "for all purposes," halting the proceedings against all other defendants. Video evidence shows Judge McAdams improperly removing Ms. Zhou from the Zoom hearing when she raised the issue of the defendants citing an outdated agreement to obtain attorney's fees, but he denied this occurrence when he disqualified himself using the excuse of making the recusal decision after the ruling window closed. It appears that delaying hearings and using the "ruling window" as an excuse to avoid facing the real issues is a common loophole exploited by some individuals within the legal system. 5. The defendant filed a frivolous complaint based on a concocted lie that could not sustain a demurrer. However, Judge Maguire stayed the demurrer motion to await the appeal result, citing the norm that demurrers are generally overruled. In fact, frivolous complaints cannot sustain a demurrer, but Judge Maguire refused to read and rule on Ms. Zhou's motion. When Ms.Zhou filed a motion to lift the stay, Judge Maguire acknowledged the complaint was unrelated to the appeal but nonetheless refused to rule on the demurrer. 6. The Yolo Superior Court clerk incorrectly invalidated Ms. Zhou's fee waiver, using an "automatic invalidation" rule. When Ms. Zhou searched online and challenged which rule they followed to invalidate the fee waiver, the court stated that it was an old rule, which had been outdated by a new rule about 1-2 years ago. However, the rule governing fee waivers, Cal. Gov. Code § 68639, has been in effect since 2009 and has never been outdated or updated. When questioned about the exact code of the rule that had expired and that the court used to invalidate Ms. Zhou's fee waiver, the court refused to provide an answer, citing "privacy issues." This demonstrates a clear misapplication of the law by the court clerk and a lack of transparency in the court's decision-making process. 7. Billionaire defendants' attorney, Ravinder Mehta, argued in the respondent's brief that the self-represented plaintiff should be treated as if represented by an attorney. However, Ms.Zhou was not afforded the same opportunities as attorneys to correct errors and faced numerous instances of unfair treatment.

    Photos
    Yolo County Superior Court - It's me at Yolo Sperior Courthouse

    It's me at Yolo Sperior Courthouse

    Yolo County Superior Court - Daper Dan for dept 8

    Daper Dan for dept 8

    Yolo County Superior Court - Correct Sentence Structure Flag in court today.

    See all

    Correct Sentence Structure Flag in court today.

    I-505 Highway - publicservicesgovt - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...