An amazing attorney who is solution and results oriented!…read more He understands how to prioritize and ethically and morally outstanding!

Adam has been my attorney for quite some time. He is thorough and knowledgeable about the divorce…read moreprocess.

I made a run at applying for SSDI without an attorney and got declined on both initial application…read moreand appeal, but when I read the finding summary from the judge it was like he never even read my diagnoses. It's really hard to understand what it is they are asking for. For that reason, I would recommend an attorney because it seemed it was just a matter of jumping through the right paperwork hoops, and that will take someone who has experience. Otherwise you're fumbling around in the dark. I was also homeless and very ill at the time. I'm tech savvy - but everything is so antiquated and being done by USPS paper copy with 10 day turnarounds for medical documentation. That's next to impossible even in the best of circumstances, but wait times are up to 6 months for some doctors now, so that's untenable. The SSDI application in America is set up to exclude people in their worst hour, and it's a moral travesty. For my second application, I mostly knew what I had to do from learning the first time around, but to be safe I got an attorney. Honestly, I wish I hadn't. Jacob Reitan was incredibly condescending and rude and would barely stay on the phone for more than 30 seconds to answer my questions. It seemed that his priority was not to represent me or answer my questions clearly but to sound like he was overwhelmed with other clients and that I should consider myself lucky to even get a call with him. He was up to 40 minutes late for return calls I had scheduled with his assistant and sometimes cancelled altogether. In the entire run of my case, I spent maybe a total of 10 minutes on the phone with him, 5 of which devolved into a shouting match because I expressed how frustrated I was getting with his lack of communication on my case. It's very clear to me that guy has anger/stress management issues. If you're a disability attorney representing someone with severe Complex PTSD, you should know enough about the diagnosis to work with a person who is fragile because they are ill. At a minimum, you should be able to maintain composure an clarity with any neurotypical baseline client. This man has neither. If he's reading this - he should take an honest look at himself, consult with the people he works with on how he is being perceived and get into therapy to deal with it. If I can do it, he can. In the end I won my case not because I was well represented, but because I had done the heavy lifting getting together my documentation and learned from my first go-around. He spoke maybe 2 sentences total during the judicial hearing. I think I won because of my thorough documentation and a fair judge.

after being in 2 car accidents leaving me disabled and trying to file said myself and I got denied…read more3 times trying for over 8 years to get approved Jacob reitan was able to help me finally get approved after the second time of trying Jacob and his team worked hard and kept the faith in it!! Thank you Jacob from the bottom of my heart for everything you and your team did to help me Thank you!!! I highly recommend Attorney Jacob Reitan if you need any help filing.

Kennedy & Cain helped us with all the paperwork needed to start our own business. They were…read moreefficient, friendly, and ready to help in the future. Everyone in the office, including the legal assistant, knew what they were doing and were supportive and positive. We highly recommend them!

Attorney Carl Christensen successfully closed our case in less than one month after meeting us…read more The case had dragged on for over a year before retaining his services. While my husband and I initially thought Mr. Christensen was expensive, he actually saved us a large amount of money with a speedy resolution. During our first meeting, Carl assured us we were on sound legal ground. He was confident our suit and counter-suit would be resolved in short order. That was hard to believe after such protracted litigation. He asked a number of questions, and, at times, pushed back against our position. Carl's approach illuminated the issues for us as litigants and for him as an attorney. This also prepared us for push back by the opposing party and provided perspective on what the opposition's motivations were in a clear, direct way. Carl then closed the case with binding mediation to the satisfaction of both parties. His ability to quickly understand the nature of the suit, the counter suit, as well as the personalities and natures of the litigants led to a solid outcome--no small feat--the result of a fine legal mind and years of experience as a litigator.

I was very happy to receive prompt attention upon contacting Christensen Law Office and was…read morepleased that I didn't have to drive all the way to their offices just to sign agreements for service; they had everything I needed to do online. Very convenient and time saving. Everything worked out from my perspective and even promptly received money back as the issue resolved quicker and simpler than it may have.

Scott Payzant at Morrison Sund represented me in an employment law/corporate buy sell dispute and I…read morehad a very positive experience. It is clear Scott has advanced knowledge of the law, but his ability to communicate with clients and his attention to detail are what I was most impressed with. Highly recommend!

I am so impressed with Baillon Thome Jozwiak & Wanta because of their track record of winning…read morecases, and the kind of cases they take on. They are a law firm that are for the people and they really want to help people that have been wronged by their employers or wronged by dishonest businesses. I also have known one of the lawyers for almost 20 years, and have met his partners and most of his colleagues. They are all really honest, kind, and caring people who genuinely want to help those in need. And at the same time they are all extremely intelligent and passionate about the work that they do. I have also visited their offices many times. The work environment is very positive with a great energy. As a guest, I always feel very welcomed into their offices from the moment I arrive at reception. The office as a whole (interns, assistants, receptionist and lawyers) are all treated as valuable members of a team, which says so much about a company. Baillon, Thome, Jozwiak, Wanta and their team are are amazing lawyers and do their best to help every client. I encourage you to read the "not recommended" Yelp reviews from actual clients, who had never written a Yelp review, but were motivated to do so because of the great services they received. These reviews are very informative about the service and experience you can expect from Baillon Thome Jozwiak and Wanta.

Wanta Thome wasted a great deal of my time, and I understand they have great reviews - so I don't…read moretake putting a 1 star lightly because I appreciate good business. *** BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE - THEY DEMAND 40% CONTINGENCEY FEE FOR PRE-LITIGATION WHICH IS HIGHER THAN USUAL, AND IT GETS WORSE*** I was referred by AI which maybe was my first mistake - but the website looked legitimate and the language seemed to match what I was looking for. I was on the website, and, without acting - a calendar popped up. I was strong-armed into booking an appointment with Carla the intake Lead. Well I book it, but then in the morning Carla e-mails me and tells me she's kicking it down to an entry level intake employee - which I resisted because my case is complex and I wanted someone with experience. Well I didn't get my way, the firm insisted that I get a greenhorn. The new intake person ended up getting fired or quit, but not before wasting my time. The first call was a standard 25 minutes and I submitted a timeline for her as well. 6 days later I get a text saying "Since you're not fired, we can't represent you, but reach out to us immediately if you DO get fired." Those were exactly the terms of rejecting me and leaving the door open. Well a few weeks later my employer ramps up the shenanigans threatening to fire me, then finally does - so I reach back out as instructed. The file is re-opened at Wanta, I'm told GREAT NEWS the attorney is taking a look! Then I had an attorney Kristan call me for another intake. I took the time to send her a detailed updated timeline. She called back with a retainer offer on another day and asked me to open it on the phone. I questioned the high fee and the fact that Wanta Thome will NOT coordinate with EEOC or NLRB inquiries/charges. Compared to what the website says, this seems to make no sense for an employee who did diligence before getting fired who already wants to use those agencies to help out his co-workers and himself. What's disturbing is the amount of wasted time. I TOLD THEM RIGHT AWAY ON THE PHONE AND IN MY TIMELINE THAT I HAVE AN NLRB CHARGE AND EEOC INQUIRY!!! IT TOOK THEM 45 DAYS TO REALIZE IT. I could have been told that initially, it could have been listed on the website in some form. Nobody on the planet it my situation would read the website and be led to believe anything otherwise. The intake process was wonky. Kristen on multiple phone calls assumed I was in Minnesota WHEN I CLEARLY AM IN CHICAGO and corrected her multiple times. They're just not paying full attention. ALSO she said She'd have to ask the partners about the EEOC/NLRB clause in the contract - she said she can't speak with them for 5 days because they're "away" -- I'm sorry, You have a huge law firm in multiple states - and the top 2 partners are going to be off the radar for a week? Do they meditate in the far east? That makes no sense. I respect any attorney's decision to decline a case for whatever reason - but at no point was I led to believe anything other than WANTA THOME IS THE PERFECT FIRM TO REPRESENT ME. I knew it was a wonky process but I told myself - as long as I get retained and they can help me - it'll be worth it. I was wrong. They offered to retain me - and all I said was "hey - do they mind doing something that their website makes it seem like they would totally do?" Advice to the firm - don't put Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, Discrimination on your website if you're not going to coordinate with NLRB or EEOC. Just put in big letters at the top "WE WANT TO SEND A LETTER FOR A HIGH FEE AND IF IT DOESNT WORK WE'RE BACKING OUT." A severe waste of my time - it's not OK - I'll never get it back. They don't really pay attention. I'm not sure what types of cases these reviews come or if they're incentivezed to send them in - but for the sake of helping people who need help - if you see any of these warning signs, consider going somewhere else. IM SO GLAD I DIDNT SIGN THAT RETAINER WITHOUT FIGHTING FOR A SENSIBLE CONTRACT. Change your website

Dan helped me through the process of filing Chapter 7 last year. For a flat fee, he took care of…read morealmost everything, and was there in the Zoom room when I had my appointment with the bankruptcy court. He also generously answered some tax questions this spring after a long communication hiatus. And he's a really nice guy. He is to be highly recommended if you have to do a bankruptcy.

After my five years plus of working with him, Dan has earned a great review. There's nothing about…read morebankruptcy and financial distress that is "easy", but it's clear that Dan works hard to make it as easy and simple as possible. He's clear in his communications, always willing to answer questions, and does a great job of explaining where you are in the journey, and what's next. I pray that I never need his services again, but he's definitely who I would return to if I did!

I was struggling to find good real estate legal advice for my unique situation. After discussing…read morewith Jon found him Very knowledgeable and helpful. I will definitely recommend him .