What has happened is that the colleges, when partnering with Higher One, accepted a system that happens to delay your funds if you do not wish to use the Higher One card, but if you do use this card you have been subjected to what the Federal Trade Commission considers deceptive practices. It matters little what Lauren Perry, Public Relations Professional of Higher One, has to say about it. There is a bit of a conflict of interest involved in her statement that "We want to make sure students are aware that Higher One has no hidden fees and no hidden agenda - the fees are clearly outlined in the terms students must accept..." Well the Federal reserve doesn't think Higher One has been doing what they can to make sure, at all, or that they have been clearly outlining some things that they are legally required to outline; and well, it just so happens it's the job of Federal Reserve Board to regulate this matter. The following is from a press release dated July 1, 2014:
"The Federal Reserve Board on Tuesday issued a consent order to cease and desist and a civil money penalty assessment of $3,510,000 against Cole Taylor Bank of Chicago, Illinois. The order addresses the participation by the bank and its agent, Higher One, Inc. of New Haven, Connecticut (Higher One), in deceptive practices in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act."
Here are the practices outlined from the Federal Reserve web site:
"The actions addressed in this order involve the following deceptive practices by Higher One, under Cole Taylor's oversight, that, at various points in the financial aid refund selection process, misled students about the OneAccount.
*The omission of material information about how students could get their financial aid refund without having to open a OneAccount;
*The omission of material information about the fees, features, and limitations of the OneAccount product, which may have made it more difficult for students to make fully informed decisions prior to selecting the method for financial aid refund disbursement;
*The omission of material information about the locations of ATMs where students could access their OneAccount without cost and the hours of availability of those ATMs; and
*The prominent display of the school logo, which may have erroneously implied that the school endorsed the OneAccount product."
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/enforcement/20140701b.htm read more