I initially thought Henry was very friendly and patient and willing to explain things, so I kept coming to his shop for repairs, but my experience with him today was quite different than before. I brought my car in because the check engine light was on and asked him to check another issue of a rattle. In my previous experiences, he said diagnostic work was $90 (now $100), but would be applied to the repair.
When I picked up the car after the diagnostic work was done and estimates given, I noticed I was charged $100 twice. He did not communicate it would be $100 for each issue, but I let it go because I figured it would be applied to the repair I was going to do on the car. His colleague Dan provided a list of things that needed repair, and I chose the oxygen sensor (which they explained was the cause of the check engine light) and the rear shocks, electing to do the more costly work later.
When I picked up the car after the repairs were done, I noticed that I was charged $80 more than the estimate. Also, the check engine light came on again after a few hours. I called to tell them that, and Dan was very short on the phone and told me to bring it back in.
When I spoke with Henry on the phone about these issues, he did not acknowledge or apologize for the poor customer service or the possible miscommunication on their part. When I brought my car in to get the check engine light checked again, I asked Henry again about the difference in estimated charges and real charges. After him going in circles with his explanations, I finally made out that he did not apply the $100 diagnostic charge to the repair of the rear shocks, because that wasn't the original issue I asked him to check. This was never communicated to me directly or clearly, that the diagnostic fee only gets applied to the specific issue we request to check. He has only said, time again, that the diagnostic fee "goes towards the repair." In this case, he came back with a list of issues which made it seem like the rear shocks were part of the initial problem. It was never made clear that it was a separate issue from the initial rattling issue, and that the $100 would not go toward repairing this "new issue" they discovered.
So, problem #1 - poor, unclear communication that leaves out a lot of important information regarding charges and diagnostic fees.
When I told Henry this was never communicated clearly to me, he said it was my fault for not asking.
Problem #2 - blaming the customer
Then there was the original issue of the check engine light. When I called back initially telling them it came back on, Dan's short response was "the guy might have replaced the wrong sensor. I don't know, I wasn't the one checking his work." Really? So you're telling me there was no central oversight and a mistake could have been made.
So when I brought it back in, Henry said that it's not uncommon for customers to come in several times for the check engine light to eventually get resolved, because they have to go through each item to see if it actually solves the problem. If this is the case, then why was I told that the check engine light was a problem with the oxygen sensor?
Back to problem #1, and problem #3 - ineffective repair work.
But, with all these major issues, the biggest problem was:
Problem #4 - Henry's attitude was unyielding and argumentative, never acknowledging or apologizing for poor communication and lack of clear, direct communication on costs to the customer, blaming me for not specifically asking for clarification (which I thought I didn't have to do because I thought I could trust him to communicate repair needs and costs clearly and directly).
Don't fooled folks, Henry may seem nice and friendly and accommodating in the beginning, but if and when he is questioned later, he does not acknowledge any fault on his end, blames the customer and fights with them. He was testy, unprofessional and back peddles when confronted. At the end, his attitude was so off-putting and frustrating I left without resolving my check engine light issue, not wanting to deal with his self-righteous, combative attitude going forward. I may have to end up paying double for duplicate work, but his attitude was so bad that I could not work with him going forward.
Problem #5 - dismal customer service when confronted with issues on costs and repair ineffectiveness.
I know he's got good reviews otherwise, but I can tell you that I was also mistakenly led to believe he was a nice guy who provides attentive customer service. That disappears and morphs into someone who is not nice and who does not even try to take the customer's viewpoint when confronted with questions about his service. read more