I was in excruciating pain and scheduled for surgery in another hospital on a Monday morning. My annual visit with Yamada happened to have been scheduled - coincidentally - months earlier for the day after my upcoming surgery so I had called to postpone my REGULAR annual checkup. His office staff was apparently instructed to ambush his patients and drag them in for a check up whereby on a Thursday afternoon before my Monday morning surgery I was rushed into his office. He had my blood test and refused to acknowledge that LDL counts go up in a non-fasting blood test; not that the numbers were so outrageous as to cause worry. He had pretty much seen similar numbers in prior years and knew that my sensitivity to drugs prevented me to take statins. We were both on the same page.
He asked if my surgery was voluntary. I said yes and began to explain what it was. He YELLED at me and said "don't tell me! I don't want to know!" And while proceeding to tell me that "of course you will be safe!" He insisted that I had to have a "clearance" from HIM, specifically and he said "this is NOT ABOUT YOU!" Then dismissed me after giving me a lecture (with a PowerPoint presentation of Dr. Google "scary news" about ambulance chasing lawyers in New Jersey who were set to sue doctors for malpractice". This had nothing to do with my "case" because he was not even willing to listen to what I was going through, the pain I was in, or that I had already given full consent to a full medical team UNRELATED to him and been fully prepped for my surgery, including having had an EKG two days earlier in another hospital. His post-visit statement to me, IN ITS ENTIRETY reads as follows: "TODAY'S VISIT: you saw Dr G Yamada on Thursday October 12, 2023. The following issue was addressed: coronary artery disease involving native coronary artery of native heart WITHOUT angina pectoris" (emphasis on WITHOUT is mine! I am 77 years old, so, of course, if I am walking around with "native arteries and heart without any negative signs, and he had already discussed how clean my arteries were after a calcium scan just a year ago, it would have behooved him to acknowledge that I don't have a baby's heart and he had NEVER considered this heart health as questionable before. As far as I can see this scam of an ambush visit was purely for his satisfaction to "prove a moot point" that had nothing to do with me (as he so clearly yelled out to me!) but to show how brilliantly careful he was at the cost of my immediate health, and his own welfare.
Yet he managed to stop the surgery which eventually had to be rescheduled for a week later, with my every pain simply getting worse.
My echocardiogram in another hospital showed NO SIGNS of abnormality in my heart and whatever anomaly he had chosen to share with doctors on my interconnected "MyChart" BUT NOT WITH ME AS A PATIENT UNDER HIS CARE sitting in his office and being ignored depended on an inverted T wave under two millimeters that can be caused by fifty other syndromes, including high anxiety in a patient in pain being bullied by a doctor who didn't even CARE to hear what was wrong with me and why I had scheduled this immediate surgery!
When I followed up in a variety of legitimate medical sources, including HIS and my own beloved Cleveland Clinic, there were clear contraindications for putting me through such anxiety-producing bullying for additional stress tests for non-cardiac-related surgeries (because, indeed, I could be "set up" by doctors like him for additional unnecessary tests that simply drive up the cost of health care without benefitting the patients).
This is exactly the kind of unnecessary testing that drives up the cost of medical treatment that is not so much for the patient's safety but to cover the likes of Yamada's behind "just in case" he could be held liable for malpractice. I had not visited him for "clearance" and standard protocol did not require a cardiologist's "clearance" in my specific case. This high handed ambush against another reputable hospital and fully qualified medical staff, simply using me as a pawn for his "high moral standing" (really?!) was unconscionable. The additional cost of my suffering and delay for surgery could certainly be cause for a lawsuit as well but I have never sued any doctor. We are all human. We make mistakes. We misjudge (I should have never stayed with such an arrogant, pompous man). And incompetence is not necessarily a crime - though his seemed well thought out and clearly not to my advantage!
I should have never stayed with him for six years worth of his forcing me into unnecessarily visiting other specialists just so he could pass the buck - "just in case" while repeatedly telling me year after year that my heart was in great shape and I would live to be a hundred! He had never even suggested any cardiac related care other than calcium scans - which I had done twice to reassure him that I was fine, though it was not covered by my insura read more