1. Evans & Dixon

0

Saint Louis, MO

Cancel

Open app

Search

Services - Evans & Dixon

Business litigation

Evans & Dixon Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Evans & Dixon

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

1 year ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

Ask the Community - Evans & Dixon

You might also consider

Verify this business for free

People searched for General Litigation 149 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

Verify this business

Flanagan & Peel, PC

Flanagan & Peel, PC

(1 review)

Downtown, Downtown St. Louis, Downtown West

I have always worked with John with any situation and he made all the difference. Hes a very…read morehonest, dependable, trustworthy attorney and i could never go to anyone else! He will make a bad situation good

From the owner: What makes a reliable lawyer? When life presents challenging situations, you need an attorney with…read morea wealth of expertise and a dedication to open communication. With more than 20 years of experience, John W. Peel Attorney at Law at Flanagan & Peel, PC in St. Louis, MO, offers the knowledge and personal attention you deserve. From criminal defense and personal injury to contract disputes and family law, he is skilled in a wide range of legal areas. If you've been accused of a crime, you can turn to this proven attorney for expert advice and honest support. Whether you're dealing with drug crime accusations or DWI offense, John takes pride in carefully examining each case to create a sound criminal defense. This caring attorney will also protect your freedom by navigating the complex structure of the court system while keeping you updated with the latest proceedings. Divorce, separation, and child custody disputes can become emotionally draining battles, but with help from this talented and compassionate lawyer, clients will have the tools to divide assets, modify child support, and file restraining orders. John understands that these are serious and delicate matters that require a high degree of attention, as well as discretion. In addition to criminal defense and family law cases, you can take advantage of this lawyer's background in civil litigation, personal injury, and medical malpractice claims...

Thompson Coburn LLP

Thompson Coburn LLP

(1 review)

Downtown St. Louis, Downtown

I can only offer my opinion that is based on my interaction with two attorneys at Thompson Coburn…read more Keep in mind there are over 400 attorneys at Thompson Coburn so in no way am I implying that my personal interactions with these two attorneys applies to all of the attorneys at this firm. First, I found their hourly rates to be very high. The attorneys I spoke with charged just under $800 per hour. Second, my impression was that these two attorneys viewed me as if they were doing me a favor, not that I was a paying client. They promised to return phone calls on certain days and I never heard from them. I had to reach-out to re-establish contact after waiting days and sometimes weeks after their promised contact date. My humble opinion is that instead of going with a large law firm that might prove intimidating to you as a client, that you find a smaller, more personable law firm that doesn't charge sky-high rates.

From the owner: Thompson Coburn is a full-service law firm that serves clients throughout the United States, as…read morewell as abroad. It specializes in the areas of tax, banking admiralty, construction, immigration, environment, real estate and intellectual property, and labor and employment law. Thompson Coburn s attorneys handle matters related to bankruptcy, creditors rights, corporate compliance, employee benefits and product liability. The firm also represents clients in matters, such as appeals, class actions, and business and mass litigations. Its attorneys have expertise in handling matters related to personal injuries, environmental remediation and product recall litigations. Thompson Coburn has represented clients, such as BNSF Railway Company, DaimlerChrysler Corporation and United Industries Corporation.

Simon Law

Simon Law

(2 reviews)

Downtown, Downtown St. Louis

Simon Law Firm represented me in a medical malpractice complaint between the years 2019-2024 that…read morewas tried in the 21st Judicial Circuit in St. Louis County Missouri. Case # 19SL-CC04680. Lead counsel From February 2019 - June 2024 was Anthony R. Friedman Mo. Bar # 65531 and upon his withdrawal Elizabeth C. McNulty Mo. Bar # 71957 was appointed lead counsel. - After a failed mediated settlement agreement conference wherein at which time Friedman shared privileged information with opposing counsel and on December 22, 2025 a formal bar complaint was delivered to the Office Of Chief Disciplinary counsel naming Anthony R. Friedman as respondent citing several violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Complainant Albert B. Pepper Jr. is now proceeding to compose a formal bar complaint naming Elizabeth C. McNulty, successor counsel as respondent also citing several violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. Multiple acts of nonfeasance, misfeasance and malfeasance were perpetrated upon their client Pepper by Friedman and it continued without remedy by McNulty and associate counsel up to, through and post trial. Evidence that support the O.C.D.C. complaints allegations are as follows: Telephone audio recordings, email correspondences, deposition transcripts, trial transcripts and case file. Any client or potential client would be well advised to document and retain everything including and specifically telephone audio recordings. The state of Missouri is a one party consent state: Under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402,. Sincerely, Albert B. Pepper Jr. - litigant pro se consumer advocate - citizen journalist. at this time you may do a google key word search for Anthony R. Friedman attorney and receive links to my consumer advocacy site. When you read the narrative and the factually allegations of the systemic misconduct perpetrated on the plaintiff client Albert B. Pepper Jr. by The Simon Law Firm P.C. it will stagger the imagination.

The first time I've been laughed at by a female law firm employee taking notes for the person…read moreconducting the initial interview for a potential case I was bringing. Zack Zidzik, who interviewed me, did not appear to have read any information I had already provided about the case by questions he asked, seemed focused on the minutia and could not see the big picture I had outlined in detail for them in return email. Zack twice asked me to "tell him everything I knew in 30 seconds" about different key elements of a case that had been unfairly decided against me by HUD with many glaring errors on their part but had now become too big for me to handle alone. Or detail for him in 30 seconds. I wondered if this was a test of my communication skills, cognitive functioning or if he was trying to impress the female on staff taking notes by asking questions about statements made on HUD documents filed by someone else in 1981. Again, failing to see the big picture with no regard given to information provided showing more recent and relevant developments regarding that aspect of the case. I later called and asked to provide feedback on the interview but no interest was shown in it or a case they already turned down without any material case evidence allowed sent to or reviewed by them to evaluate the merits of my case.

Evans & Dixon - general_litigation - Updated November 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...