Our child, a kindergartner, began this program promisingly, but the experience declined very badly. From a happy and motivated new swimmer who worked hard to gain foundational skills and took pride in his progress we came eventually to have a demoralized kid who did not want to attend class.
There are some nice folk on the staff. The aquatics directors are personable and work to develop a rapport with the kids. The swim instructors assigned to our son were almost all engaging and pleasant or at least pleasant enough. The executive director is rough, with poor people skills or no interest in exercising them, but we rarely had to deal with her so no big deal. Unfortunately the good nature and reasonable competence of most of the people we dealt with cannot overcome the basic failures of the program.
The program takes great pride in what it considers a unique method of training. That fixation on what it touts as a singular method comes at the expense of a focus on children and the best way to teach them.
The unique CRA method is, very simply, a strictly linear acquisition of precisely defined skills. If you have perfected skills A B C D E F and G, say, you may move up to the next level, and start on a new set of skills. If you have perfected all of the skills listed except for one, you must repeat the level. As many times as it takes. No new skill for you unless you get the full set exactly right. Imagine learning to write in this way. After much effort, your A and B and C and D and E and F are fine, but your G is crooked, just keeps coming out crooked. Well, too bad, kid. No H for you, or for that matter any other letter, until you get that G just right. If it takes all year and longer you will write that A-to-G set out, over and again, until ALL of them are just exactly right. Don't like it? Well, now, isn't that a GREAT reason to work harder and get to that next level?
Amazing, but that last question is actually the response we were given when we tried, for the final time, to advocate for our son. He had been kept at the same level for the better part of a school year. Again, we are talking about a kindergartner. Most seriously, we are also talking about a child trying to gain a basic survival skill. Bluntly put, this is program that will not teach your child how to use his arms until he works his legs exactly, but exactly, so. Though some parents seemed impressed by the program's claims that perfect swimming form is key to water survival, this argument boggles the mind. Our youngest are the most vulnerable to drowning accidents. The most humane approach would seem to equip them with basic survival capabilities first, and emphasize refinements second.
Important to note, as much as CRA is wedded to presenting itself as a strictly methodical program, in practice their work is inconsistent and subjective. If your child signs on for two classes in a session, with two different instructors, he may receive two entirely different performance evaluations. This happened to us. Then, session after session, our child's report cards showed steady progress, getting closer and closer to a completed roster--EXCEPT that every instructor defined different skills as achieved or needing improvement. Trying to get explanations for this was akin to talking to a wall, even if usually a smiling one. We remained optimistic. Quantitatively, anyway, our child WAS getting closer to a completed roster, and we could see his progress as he propelled himself across the pool. Soon he would be allowed to let go of the flotation device and figure out what to do with his arms. Only one box left to check off. But then -- wham, back a few steps. Why? No explanation given. We were told only that the current evaluation was correct.
Hitting a communicational wall was a constant feature of the CRA experience. Very little value seems to be placed on clarity, comprehensibility, and transparency. As another example of this, decisions to advance a child to a next level are given at the end of each session. However, parents must register for each session weeks before that decision is made. To register, you must select a level. Don't yet know your child's next level? Of course you don't. That decision will be given at the end of the session. I witnessed a parent whose child was finally advanced, she felt due in part to pressure from her, but by then the registration period had come and gone and the next level's class was filled.
In short, this seems to be a program with an autocratic bent that trumps their educational purpose, oriented toward upholding its own interests and image first. It's not a great place for a child to learn. read more