Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Auto Web Expo

    2.3 (123 reviews)

    Services - Auto Web Expo

    Check engine light

    Engine oil light diagnosis

    Auto general diagnosis

    20 More Services

    Auto noise diagnosis

    Tire Pressure Monitoring System diagnosis

    Auto no-start diagnosis

    Auto vibration diagnosis

    Auto diagnosis or inspection

    Auto pre-purchase inspection

    Auto maintenance

    Oil changes

    Auto repairs

    Auto battery or electrical system repair

    Auto brake repair

    Auto engine repair

    Auto exhaust repair

    Auto HVAC repair

    Auto light repair

    Auto steering and suspension repair

    Auto transmission repair

    Auto wheel and tire repair

    Routine automotive maintenance

    Transmission leak inspection

    Auto Web Expo Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Auto Web Expo

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    Reviews With Photos

    My new baby

    William is THE BEST dealer EVER!!! He was up front about everything and went ABOVE AND BEYOND to make the deal happen! This was my first purchase buying a car online and HE MADE IT SO EASY! I HIGHLY RECOMMEND William when buying a car!!!

    Base price higher than advertised online.
    Justin C.

    WATCH FOR THE SCAM :EXPENSIVE ADD-ONS LIKE $999 "Dealer Prep Fee" : BAIT-AND-SWITCH! This review is long and fact specific - so you know it's actually real. I don't know Mia H, but her review below sounds strangely similar!!! Look at the dates, this is happening right now! So yes, BUYER BEWARE! **IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THE WHOLE THING, HERE'S THE SHORT VERSION: Auto Web Expo advertises low prices through CarGurus to get "Great Deal" ratings. They also tack on a non-negotiable $999 "Dealer Prep Fee" to vehicles less than a year old. They tack on $125 "Document fees." If you call on an advertised price from online, they'll have increased the price by the time you get to the dealership. They told me the unit was ready for test drive, then turned away my vehicle inspector TWICE - once because the vehicle "wasn't on the lot yet" and once because "I needed to come to an agreed price before I spent the money to have it inspected." David Garza and Ali-Hussain appear to be running a scam! IF YOU DECIDE TO DO BUSINESS WITH THESE GUYS, ASK FOR ALL THE PRICING UP FRONT. ASK FOR IT IN WRITING, THEY WON'T WANT TO DO THAT AND THERE'S A REASON THEY DON'T WANT TO PUT IT IN WRITING - YOU MAY PAY A LOT MORE ONCE IT'S ACTUALLY ON PAPER! Full Story: I'm a lawyer in San Antonio who was asked by my mother to purchase a vehicle for her - her first Mercedes! I found a vehicle advertised by Auto Web Expo through CarGurus. I was excited because the price was rated as "Great Deal." Reached out on May 23rd, 2020 about a 2018 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class with 29,469 miles and priced at $27,388. The add also said, "Price includes $300 delivery fee." Three days later, I received a response from salesman David Garza by text saying, "I have a 2018 Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class that you inquired for, available today. Send me a text or give me a call to schedule your test drive. I called to schedule a test drive and sent an auto inspector to look at the vehicle. Upon arrival, my inspector was told the vehicle was in transit, not on the lot. He was turned away. I called David to ask what was going on, he apologized for the mistake, and said he would call me when the unit arrived. He didn't call back. I reached out on May 29th and asked if the unit was available. David told me he would check and call back in about 30 minutes. I waited all day. He texted me that he informed by inspector the unit was ready. I responded I appreciated David's contact, but wasn't comfortable working with him anymore . I requested a different salesman. (By this time the online price increased to $27,624 and the three-hundred dollar delivery fee "included in price" notation under the ad had disappeared). That afternoon, I was contacted by the "internet sales manager" named Ali-Hussain. I was assured my experience would be different and that he would take care of me. I sent two offers and explained I preferred to get the negotiation done by text or e-mail (I know it's too easy to lie over the phone and what is said verbally means nothing - ask for it in writing). Getting a response in writing was like pulling teeth. Ali kept wanting to "talk on the phone" to "explain his counter offer" and so there "could be no confusion." (You can't get much clearer than a written offer). Anyhow, I finally got his counter-offer in writing and the vehicle price was......$31,318.02. (They had raised the base price of the vehicle, again to $28,243). On May 30, Ali told in text, "All vehicle go through service and reconditioning, all our vehicles have $899, our online prices are the best and final prices." (except the online price doesn't include the Prep Fee and when you get it, it's $999, not $899, see my screen shots). But here's the key, Ali writes, "We priced them below the going market prices," THEY DO THIS TO GET CLICKS AND A 'GREAT DEAL' RATING ON CARGURUS, THEN RAISE THE PRICE AND TACK ON OVER A THOUSAND DOLLARS IN FEES. I pointed out to Ali the Vehicle Prep Fee is not disclosed on the CarGurus web site, he responded, "That is a third party advertising price." NOTE: that "third-party advertising price" is set by the dealership and the vehicle add is paid for by the dealership. That vehicle is still there, listed at $29,009 and it's only a Fair Deal, now. BUYER BEWARE!!!

    The first vehicle where a piece of the grill just happened to fall out

    See all

    4 months ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    1 year ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 7
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 1

    6 years ago

    Helpful 7
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 7
    Thanks 0
    Love this 3
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 5
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 2

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 3
    Love this 2
    Oh no 1
    Photo of Adrian B.
    345
    23
    10

    4 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 5
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Dionna R.
    651
    5
    30

    5 years ago

    Helpful 5
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0
    Photo of Lee Y.
    0
    16
    8

    4 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    2 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 1
    Love this 1
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 2

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    5 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    8 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 4
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    5 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 3
    Oh no 0

    7 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 2
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    7 years ago

    Helpful 3
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    6 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Helpful 2
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 1

    3 years ago

    Helpful 1
    Thanks 0
    Love this 1
    Oh no 1

    Page 1 of 4

    Ask the Community - Auto Web Expo

    You might also consider

    Texas Cars Direct - She wants me to buy this for her Dad

    Texas Cars Direct

    (96 reviews)

    North Dallas

    I purchased a Ford F250 from TexasCarsDirect back in September. I flew in from Chicago to pick up…read morethe truck. Upon arriving and meeting with David Urby, I took the truck for a test drive. There was some minor issues but the most glaring was the check engine light. David said the issues would be taken care of, go to lunch and come back in a couple of hours. He called me and said they needed a part that would not be there until Monday. David paid for my flight home and said the truck would be shipped to me. I received the truck late the next week. When driving from where I received the truck, the check engine light came on. I notified him of this issue and he said to have it fixed locally and he would reimburse me. It has been several months and many texts and calls and still no reimbursement. Up until this point, David lived up to his word but I am extremely disappointed to have to write a partial negative review due to not receiving this promised reimbursement. In addition, the check engine issue took two times to resolve, the second requiring an additional cost which I decided to absorb thinking I would get the promised reimbursement. In closing, David did live up to his word on everything until this reimbursement issue so I can't give a 5 star review due to this

    1. They do not honor their "guarantee" on their website of giving you $500 over CarMax, so you…read moreimmediately cannot trust them. We had a clear and valid offer in-hand from CarMax, and they refused to honor their $500 over guarantee. 2. Calling them is a disorganized mess. It's hard to get a hold of who you need, or set an appointment at a particular location, time and with a particular person. They botched our appointment, twice. 3. "This will just take 15 minutes" turned into almost an hour. Avoid.

    Auto Express - Bad response

    Auto Express

    (70 reviews)

    We purchased a car from Auto Express two months ago, and it has been a nightmare ever since…read more Shortly after the purchase, we began having issues and decided to get a professional opinion. After taking it to three independent mechanics, we were told the car requires over $10,000 in repairs--and more importantly, that it's dangerous to drive in its current condition. If my son and his family were going at a high rate of speed at the time it broke, it could have caused an accident. All three mechanics said the vehicle was a danger to be on the road. When we brought this to the dealership's attention, their response was that we could have had the car inspected if we had asked. We were under the impression that they had a mechanic on-site, given the size of their lot and number of vehicles. This lack of transparency was disappointing and misleading. We have since learned that Auto Express often sources their vehicles from up north and coastal regions, where cars are commonly exposed to severe rust and deterioration. This was never disclosed to us during the sales process. We feel completely taken advantage of. If you're considering buying from Auto Express, have the vehicle thoroughly inspected by an independent mechanic before signing anything, and ask where the car originally came from. We wouldn't wish this experience on anyone.

    These folks are just selling cars on a "what you see is what you get basis." They are very straight…read moreforward that they don't care what's wrong with the car, it's your job to evaluate it and decide if it's right for you. They aren't doing anything shady at all, but they did have a whole lot of very worn cars I would be afraid of. The unit I went to look at wasn't ready to show as far as I'm concerned. It had a leaking donut gasket in the exhaust, the cowl vents full of dirt and grass, and the console lid inside the car had been shredded. I didn't even ask them to get it out of the garage where I could drive it. I was looking at a big Buick, but they also had a super-clean Chevrolet Impala with a few more miles on it, but the car was in well-cared-for condition. I asked them to get that one out and we took it for a test drive and found nothing wrong with it but a "service air bag" light on, which we were willing to deal with. The suspension was still tight, the interior in blemish-free condition, a minor blemish on the rear plastic bumper cover, and the engine compartment clean. The motor was absolutely quiet, and running well, and so I left with a slightly younger Chevrolet than the Buick I thought I was interested in. Buyer beware on some of the units on this lot, but they are not misrepresenting them. It's the buyers responsibility to decide if a unit is right for them, and I'd encourage anyone to check carefully. They had some certified junk on the lot, but had some equally clean units in good condition. It all depends on what you want to pay, and how much car you expect to get for your money. Nothing about this transaction appeared to be shady, or in any way intended to misrepresent what they have to sell. They were courteous, kind, and professional in all parts of this transaction. I particularly like that they didn't even offer me an extended warranty, or try to add other charges into the transaction, such as dealer preparation, which I view to be taking advantage of the ignorant. It was cash-and-carry, and if it breaks they buyer gets both pieces. I've had the car in service for a week now, and I have discovered a minor transmission leak. At age 13 with 120,000 miles on it that's a little deal to me, and I'm satisfied with what I paid.

    Auto Merchants - Mc220

    Auto Merchants

    (162 reviews)

    I recently bought a car from AM and worked directly with Carlos Lopez. Carlos was…read moreoutstanding--knowledgeable, responsive, and incredibly helpful throughout the entire process. The pricing was reasonable, and there was absolutely no pressure--just transparency and candor from start to finish. I had a very solid experience with AM and truly enjoyed working with Carlos.

    CONSUMERS BEWARE! PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY ANNOUNCEMENT:…read more We weren't coerced or bribed with things of value to write a positive business review of Auto Merchants Inc. This is an authentic business review of our interactions with the owner/Sid S. and his employee/Octavio C. over the previous 900 days, as it relates to the owner's grossly past due insufficient funds check. NOT REWARDING DISHONORABLE CONDUCT: It's more important than ever for a consumer to do their due diligence in sufficiently investigating the individual or business they are considering investing their hard earned money with, and only reward individuals and businesses that operate ethically, legally and constitutionally at all times. This objective, to the best of our knowledge and recollection of facts and/or opinion based business review will assist in that mission, as it relates to Auto Merchants, Inc., for the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior! INTRODUCTION: An insufficient funds check is a serious civil and criminal offense that is actionable under Texas Business and Commerce Code 3.302 (holder in due course) and Texas Penal Code - Chapter 31 -Offenses Against Property (THEFT). This legal and constitutional protected business review is designed to kindly compel Auto Merchants, Inc. to comply with Texas law, and the fiduciary responsibility of their company established by the Secretary of State, and immediately resolve the balance of their grossly past due insufficient funds check on file at Lee's Check Cashing without further subterfuge and/or obfuscation and/or delay. 1. Check date: 5-2-23, check # 5980, amount: 3000.00. Receiver of funds: Octavio C. Total balance due NOW: 1500.00 + 900.00 (reoccurring administrative resolution fees) = 2400.00. FACTS OF CASE AND CONDITIONS OF THE LAW: On 5-2-23, Auto Merchants, Inc. issued a check to an employee/Octavio C. for duties/services performed. The employee cashed the check at Lee's Check Cashing, and the check was returned to the check cashing establishment due to insufficient funds, because the check issuer intentionally stopped payment on the check within hours of issuing the check. Subsequently, over the next 150 plus days, the owner of the check cashing establishment contacted Auto Merchants Inc. and/or the receiver of funds in order to compel them to comply with the aforementioned Texas check laws and resolve the grossly past due insufficient funds check. Due to the refusal and/or failure of Auto Merchants, Inc. to comply with Texas check laws, their unpaid check was delegated to the authority of the Loss Prevention Department to facilitate immediate resolution. The owner alleged (without proof) his account was 'hacked," as the justification why he stopped payment on his check. He alleged the employee was given a 3000.00 dollar replacement check and snapped; "you better check our records!" If true, he did so without using basic business common sense, in first verifying the legal holder in due course of his returned check, and if the employee deposited the initial check into his bank account or cashed the check at a check cashing establishment. The employee was interviewed to verify the owner's claim. The employee alleged he was confused and thought the 3000.00 dollars was his, since the check was written in his name. The investigator helped him realize how preposterous his claim was received, so he confessed to intentionally embezzling the 3000.00 dollars in funds that were legally required to resolve the insufficient funds at our check cashing establishment. The owner was informed multiple times in writing and text, if he paid the employee to resolve his insufficient funds check, and he refused and/or failed to resolve the check with the legal holder in due course, his check is legally unpaid, and he is legally required to immediately resolve his check at our check cashing establishment, and he may file embezzlement charges against his employee for the alleged theft of his 3000.00 dollars if he refused and/or failed to return the funds he allegedly stole from him. The owner defiantly and irresponsibly refused and/or failed to comply with Texas check laws, and instead offered to pay 300.00 dollars every two weeks until paid in full, lending to the reasonable speculation the real reason he stopped payment on his check is not because his account was "hacked," but because of poor money management and/or lack of sales revenue due to poor, substandard business practices. At the point the owner's unpaid check was approximately 250 days past due Texas law, he finally made one measly 300.00 dollar payment on 1-24-24, and subsequently four more 300.00 dollar payments on 2-8-24, 3-6-24, 4-3-24, 5-8-24 and abruptly stopped without the consent of the victim, leaving a balance of 1500.00 dollars for over 575 days; in the process ignoring two certified letters, and over 100 text and phone calls to compel him to resolve the balance.

    Auto Web Expo - autorepair - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...