Cancel

    Open app

    Search

    Taylor, Eldridge & Endres

    3.0 (4 reviews)
    Open 8:30 am - 6:00 pm

    Services - Taylor, Eldridge & Endres

    General litigation

    Real estate law

    Taylor, Eldridge & Endres Photos

    You might also consider

    Recommended Reviews - Taylor, Eldridge & Endres

    Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
    Yelp app icon
    Browse more easily on the app
    Review Feed Illustration

    5 months ago

    Business owner information

    Photo of Taylor E.

    Taylor E.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    4 years ago

    Business owner information

    Photo of Taylor E.

    Taylor E.

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    3 years ago

    Helpful 0
    Thanks 0
    Love this 0
    Oh no 0

    Ask the Community - Taylor, Eldridge & Endres

    You might also consider

    Verify this business for free

    People searched for General Litigation 268 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

    Verify this business

    Lieb at Law

    Lieb at Law

    (4 reviews)

    My family and I worked with Lieb at Law on a land dispute case spanning nearly 8 years, spending…read moremore than two hundred fifty thousand dollars with the firm before the case was finally settled (and not at all in my favor). We were consistently disappointed at most every turn. First and foremost, they do incredibly sloppy work. Time and time again basic, secretarial-level mistakes were made, from not being able to keep legal documents in the correct order (mixing pages of older revisions with new ones), inadequate preparation of documents for notarizing (not leaving enough space for notary stamps and signatures), and consistent inattention to details (important names spelled incorrectly, random typos and other details overlooked), all leading to repeated avoidable delays and time and money lost. Worse, they charged me to fix these mistakes of their own making. For example, I made a over dozen documented calls/emails to Lieb to add the client's middle initial to a document, as required by the county clerk, before the change was finally made. Afterwards, I found I was charged $150 for most of these calls -- to fix their own errors! This type of nickel-and-dime behavior was prevalent throughout our entire relationship and is perhaps best exemplified by them charging me for 15 minutes of their time when I hand-delivered a document to their office (never mind that I drove 3 hours round-trip to do so). It is worth noting that I paid EVERY bill from them within two days of receipt, yet was once charged a late fee. This, despite spending more a quarter of a million dollars with the firm, was a very bitter pill to swallow. They don't do a thorough job of tying up loose ends and then years later, they trip over their own mess--and then charge AGAIN to put it right! Once in the hands of the judge, Lieb's "carefully crafted defense" was rejected almost immediately. In my opinion, Lieb at Law is lousy on a basic level. I'd say they were inept at every task I've always expected a lawyer to be proficient at. It boggles my mind to see Lieb at Law get so many good reviews when my experience was a constant string of nightmares.

    I was represented by Natalie Donaldson from Lieb at Law, and she is simply the best. In life, cheap…read moreis expensive and expensive is cheap. The same goes for any service business -- whether it's a doctor, a lawyer, or a contractor, you hire the best, not the cheapest. How would you like to lose a lawsuit and say, "well, he gave me the best price"? That was never going to be me. I interviewed dozens of attorneys and chose Lieb at Law because I wanted proven performance. Within minutes of my consultation with Natalie, I knew she was the one to represent me. She is efficient, on top of her game, knows the law inside and out, and has the skill to position, present, and navigate a courtroom to get results. Natalie worked with me through financial hardship and still secured the lowest possible settlement. With her representing me, I didn't feel like the outcome was uncertain -- when you hire the best, you get results. The entire Lieb at Law team was outstanding. Andrew Lieb sets the tone for excellence, and his staff delivers. Their assistant Laurin was also extremely helpful and understanding throughout the process. If you want the best, stop looking. Natalie Donaldson and Lieb at Law are who you call.

    Law Office of Peter A. Romero

    Law Office of Peter A. Romero

    (4 reviews)

    Peter Romero was amazing. He and his staff were very welcoming, empathetic and kind. i Called not…read moreexpecting to hear back and within the next hour I received a call to come in and talk about my situation. He went above and beyond to help me get justice and in a quick and timely manner as well!

    Upon receiving my settlement checks on one of them they took out nearly 50% of what I had received…read more Before, receiving the checks I had also sent Matt an email and even spoke with him by phone, he did not tell me that it would be 50% of the check amount. He was condescending stating he did not know the amounts/percentage tile , and for me to ask my tax preparer or accountant "which I had and the percentage tile they gave me for the check amount was a lot less rather than 50%." When I had arrived at the office to pick up the check all "Matt could say is that my check is in the normal range he sees when the employer deducts taxes out." So then he knew it would be nearly 50% they take out for taxes, so then why not just tell me that, instead of having me contact my tax preparer??? Why BOTHER having me contact my tax preparer in the first place? When I had picked up the check, he met with me in front of the receptionist desk being "Samantha Iglesias" which she was present I began asking him questions in front of Samantha that's when she started looking at me then looking back over at Matthew then at some point Matt and Samantha looked back at each due to my questions she then starting shaking her head. He just kept blowing off my question(s) when I had asked him, why did they take out so much? His response was... Well that just means you will receive back more money at the end of the year from IRS. My response is... "I DON'T receive money back from IRS no thanks to someone who committed TAX FRAUD in my name, using my social which explains why I don't receive tax refunds at the END of the YEAR! I'm sure your nosey receptionist Samantha, wouldn't have been looking at me then back looking over at Matt and meanwhile Matt at some point looked over back at her when she had shook her head. Nosey girl mind your business and stop listening to clients questions- I'm pretty sure if you had been victimized by tax fraud I'm pretty sure you'd be upset/disappointed too by the amount of taxes being deducted. Matt also was not much help on answering my questions about why none of the amounts matched from what he informed me to what my tax preparer stated "those amounts were ridiculously to HIGH and clear did not take out what I had been advised." "Had you would have ASKED me, why I was concerned with the amount of taxes being deducted in the first place!" I've also hired personal injury lawyer(s) and non of them have EVER handed me my checks in front of a receptionist less know spoke about my case in front of a receptionist the way Matt conducted himself. They've always either had me in their office or in their conference room for me to sign release and pick up checks and then hand them to me. Considering you no longer work for the employer I don't feel as though they're entitled to deduct taxes at especially for something they're AT-FAULT for even a "personal injury lawsuit for insurance purposes does not deduct taxes" I also, don't believe they are taking taxes out on every settlement for each client. Had they would have told me that UPFRONT and straightforward I probably wouldn't have SETTLED for the amount in which we agreed upon. I had also asked Matt Farnworth upon signing for the check(s) and had been receiving them at the receptionist front desk being "Samantha Iglesias" which felt almost like ganging up on someone to me it should not take 2 persons to have a client both sign for release and pickup of checks, handing the checks over to me, and asking the attorney Matt questions in front of the receptionist "Samantha Iglesias." The attitude, personality, and behavior of the receptionist really just killed the whole vibe. Aside from this they did work aggressively on my case, always responded to BOTH my emails and calls within a timely manner. They definitely fought the fight for me during mediation and filing and was always there for me by my side. Retained a high settlement! But between what Matt said about the deductions, your receptionist, & picking up and signing for the checks with the receptionist and talking in front of her to Matt was just an odd experience "I've never experienced that not even with a personal injury attorney." That was sloppy. Beware!

    Taylor, Eldridge & Endres - general_litigation - Updated May 2026

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...