Dear Sir,
The manuscript that I received back still had some language mistakes, but as I changed this editor's suggestions, I also corrected those faults as far as I could. Thus, I believe that the manuscript is better, but probably far from perfect. This was an Award winning manuscript of Euro 3000 (the contents counted) at a university in Madrid, and as I told the secretary of the contest-jury that this manuscript had some language mistakes (because it was quite long and made in hurry), it needed both corrections and re-shuffling. The head of the university (General Secretary) said that the language could be corrected before publishing if I did not change the contents (meanings). Thus, I contacted Scribendi, as I had done many times before, but this manuscript came back with many more mistakes than usual ( my prevous Scribendi-edited publications are published on https://palmer.academia.edu/JensAndersKjersem ).
However, I re-wrote and re-shuffled the contents as good as I could, following this editor's suggestions, plus correcting grammar mistakes when these were found, which were mostly words let out or forgotten to put in.
Of course, I could return the manus for further correction by the same editor, as I think that the faults would be disclosed when this editor went over it again; however, with the cost involved in another round would be too great, so I guess I must trust myself and my language correction program of WORD. I have promised to deliver the manus corrected by me on Monday morning and I will keep that time.
Sincerely,
Jens Anders Kjersem AS
C/O Jens Anders Dag Kjersem, DC
jensadk@gmail.com read more
