**POTENTIAL TENANT AND PROPERTY OWNER BEWARE**
It was all smooth sailing throughout the showing, application, approval and fee-collection process, but quickly turned into a gut-wrenching nightmare for me and my family trying to move-into our new rental property with this company. While "Rent-in-Richmond" may sound like a sound service offering tenants the ability to "rent in Richmond," they will be the first to tell you that they represent the investments of their property owners, not -- as you may have thought or wanted to believe -- you, the tenant. But let me tell you -- there is NO WAY that a property owner should trust this company to give their property or its potential tenants the attention necessary for safe/healthy living conditions. (Unless you know your property is mold-infested and are as desperate as these guys to make a quick buck off unassuming, respectful and trustworthy tenants.)
Our experience as new customers has been so upsetting that we can not in good conscience take possession of the property that we're supposed to be moving into this week... and at what looks like a loss of our $1600 security deposit and application fee.
A little background on the business: Whit Brooks, our landlord's agent (remember, they are not servicing the tenant) and the "Director of Operations" is the acting leader of the organization. His parents are listed on the "About" page, but don't seem to be very aware of how poorly this office is managed. My guess is, as a business operating under a DBA name, he can claim that this is a "family business" to seem more trustworthy. There are only two other property managers and two admin-related employees that manage several hundred properties. Their only function is to get properties rented and make money for landlords - DO NOT EXPECT CUSTOMER SERVICE OR CONSISTENT COMMUNICATION (it's not part of their "process"). Further, and perhaps most ironically, is that Whit's father sits on the ethics arm of the Richmond Association of Realtors.
Our experience: Whit was quick to respond and set-up a time to show the property. Despite having yet to-be cleaned and still in-need of necessary repairs and maintenance ("Oh yeah, all that chipped paint will be painted over, no worries!"), we loved the house. We did a quick run-through and decided to put in an application that day, with a clear understanding between us and the company that the third tenant (who was unavailable for the initial showing) would be able to see the home before we signed the lease. Up until this point, we were treated with respect -- even if in fake, salesmanship form.
Where we stand now: At this point, we've paid the application fee and security deposit. Our application is accepted and with every correspondence, we have asked to again view the property. Whit wouldn't even entertain the idea until he recieved our fully-signed lease agreement. Not being able to see the property before signing this lease (that holds you accountable for damages outside the standard lease) was a major red flag. If I'm expected to be held liable for all fixtures, facilities, appliances, electrical, plumbing, sanitary, and HVAC systems (as enumerated in the lease agreement), I'd at least like to know where they're located on-site. For instance, there's an entire basement of equipment that the property owner expects us to be familiar with (again, according to the lease we were encouraged to sign prematurely).
Days and weeks have passed without any answer to our repeated requests to see the property before move-in day. Finally, 4-business days prior to our move-in date, Whit agreed to let us on the property to ask questions, take measurements for furniture that we'd been waiting to order, make another generalized walk-through... in the hopes that when move-in day came, we could just grab the keys and proceed smoothly. Upon arrival, we found that NOTHING had been touched on the property in the month it had sat vacant since our initial visit. Cracked paint that covered moisture-burdened areas remained as were, cobwebs draped from every surface, and it reeked of pet urine. We weren't able to test the plumbing fixtures or HVAC.
Beyond that, Whit spent our time on the property chatting with his buddy Bryan -- far from attentive to our concerns. This was an appointment we had been desperately waiting for, (for an entire month...), which is in-part what made it even more disappointing when Whit attempted to rush us off the property after 5-minutes (seriously, five minutes... that's not an exaggeration), promising us "plenty of time within the next few days," when he knew very well that we would be traveling and unavailable until almost immediately before our move. After a grand total of 10 minutes on-site, he asked us to leave so he could go to lunch. When we reminded him how of important this walk-through was, he raised his voice and snapped, "I DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR THIS SORT OF ATTITUDE," and stomped away. He made sur read more