Ken is an essential partner to my business. I rely on him to advise me on activities that will help…read moreme tax-wise. He is by the book too - something I appreciate very much. He checks in with me mid-year to make sure I'm on track as well.

Kenneth is a true professional and welcomes you into his home like a gentleman. He was able to go…read moreover my taxes and treated me with respect and that's really what we all ask for. I will without a doubt go back to Kenneth and give him my business and refer people to him. If you want things done and done right when it comes to your taxes Kenneth is the guy for you!

I found Chelsea thru Yelp. I needed help with filing my taxes this year due to it being too…read morecomplicated to do on Turbo Tax. She was a bit hard to get in touch with at times, but overall had a great experience with her. She was quick to file and to communicate clearly about was going on. I definitely recommend using her! Thanks again, Chelsea!!

My husband and I just bought our first home with the help of Zena at Sayegh. Through the whole…read moreprocess, she was responsive and kind. We were clueless and she was patient and clear in her explanations. Top it all off, she has positively ravishing penmanship.

I have used this Law Firm several times and have never been disappointed. Most importantly, client…read morecommunication, knowledge of legal situation when needed services, great with time sensative documents, and transparency when handling cases. I intend to keep using this Law Firm for all of my legal needs. Butch Keane

Park City Insurance group has handled my auto,homeowners and life insurance for 15 years…read more John Delvecchio is extremely knowledgeable about the insurance industry and has looked out for best interest several times. This day and age insurance companies are buying each other,merging and it can be very confusing. John calls me with updated info of what's going on and what I should do. He has saved me a lot of money because of his diligence. Over the years I have bough and sold 3 homes and have had different cars like everyone else. Every time one of these changes happens John and his associates have made it easy. 2 months ago I needed my windshield replaced on one of my cars. I called Park City to ask who I should call and what steps to take to have it fixed. John said he would set up everything and he did. I was very busy with my job at the time so it was great I didn't have to call the insurance company and wait on hold. There are fewer and fewer businesses that take the time to provide good service. My wife and I are very happy to have John Delvecchio and his staff looking out for us.

The principal owner at Park City is the least professional person I've ever dealt with in the…read moreinsurance industry, and I used to work in the industry for 8 years. Last year I went to John for a renters policy on a 2 family dwelling. He put with me with Utica First for a great price and coverage, everything was perfect. He told me I didn't need to pay anyhting and that my mortgage company would take care of it. He even offered to have that straightened out directly with the mortgage company. Ultimately he sat on it too long and the initial bill never got paid. Then Utica cancelled me for non-payment and refused to let me go back. I went to John and he claimed it was my bank's fault for the insurance not getting paid. I was going to write a letter to the insurance commissioner last year but decided not to because John promised me that I could go back to Utica after I had the policy in tact for a year. So I let it go initially and approached the situation again this year for renewal. John told me when I called back that Utica will NEVER take me back because once you get cancelled for non-payment that's it, they don't reconsider you. So now I am stuck with an unfavorable market and the premium is double what I was originally quoted with Utica. So I said to John "Hey John, you know what, you really screwed me last year with the whole billing situation". John flew off the handle and started acting belligerent, told me to take my business elsewhere and even said "you're on the preferred list, I prefer you get the hell out of here". Overall, John proved again that he is not only incompetent as an insurance producer but he is also extremely pompous and arrogant and refuses to acknowledge his own mistakes. This year I am filing a complaint with the insurance commissioner.

May 4, 2023 Charles…read moreRio and his colleagues have consistently provided me with superb services. They have been kind, efficient, personable, and reliable, and their rates are reasonable. On the occasions that I have had questions or really needed assistance, they have responded quickly and effectively. When I call the office, I know that the help I need will be provided. I have had accounts with a number of insurance agencies over many years, and the Charles Rio Agency has been the best by far.

Took over $10K for services and then did not produce materials for probate and will/estate. Won't…read morereturn calls, emails, and when she does she says she will send paperwork but never does. Make excuses for her incompetence. Do NOT use Linnea Levine.

Linnea Levine is an incredible elder care attorney. She has a keen ability to listen and ask the…read moreright questions. She thoughtfully plans an approach, based on her client's needs, leveraging her vast knowledge and years of experience with elder care matters. She is resulted oriented, which is extremely helpful when working on cases that can involve a significant amount of research, forms and government approvals. She takes it all in stride and, with the help of her wonderful assistant Louisa, she gets the job done. I highly recommend her!

I recently consulted with Alex Cuda regarding a child support enforcement matter -- a…read moremagistrate-level proceeding, not a complex litigation case, with a relatively limited procedural framework. I came prepared with documentation and ensured his office received my materials the day before the consultation. Throughout the meeting, he did not appear to refer to anything I had submitted, and based on the questions he asked, it did not seem that he had reviewed my materials or even looked up the docket number I had provided in advance. For someone billing $800 per hour, the lack of preparation was difficult to reconcile with the certainty with which he spoke. When discussing the case, he would isolate a single detail from its broader context and dwell on it at length despite having access to the full documentation. That isolated point would then become the basis for a sweeping and dismissive conclusion delivered with great confidence, though the actual record did not appear to support it. When I asked direct questions -- what does that mean, how does that fit into the case -- the responses often became more legal terminology rather than clearer explanation. The effect was less analytical than evasive. What was especially striking was the level of authority and detail he brought to describing the opposing party's supposed strengths while not appearing to have meaningfully reviewed the materials I had provided. The confidence with which he characterized a case he had not actually examined was itself notable. Throughout the consultation, his $20,000 retainer surfaced repeatedly and often unprompted -- not as a routine disclosure or in response to specific questions, but almost as a refrain. In the context of a child support enforcement matter in magistrate court, the repetition felt less informational than performative. There was also a persistent dismissiveness to his manner -- at times less like professional detachment and more like open condescension -- unlike anything I experienced with any other attorney I consulted. Most tellingly, after nearly an hour, I had to ask him myself whether I should request a continuance -- one of the most basic procedural considerations available under the circumstances. That it never arose independently during the consultation says a great deal about what the meeting actually produced. I left without a strategy, without a coherent framework, and without the level of guidance that should be the minimum expectation of a paid legal consultation.

I contacted Needle & Cuda seeking legal help for a serious and urgent matter specifically because…read morethe firm handles domestic violence cases. I was honestly appalled by how I was treated, particularly by an intake staff member named Allison. I was initially told twice that someone would call me back, and no one ever did. When I called a third time, I spoke with Allison and she told me the reason she didn't return either call was because their "system was messed up because of the snow." I explained my situation and, toward the end of the call, mentioned that my prior attorney was requiring me to sign an appearance form before returning my retainer. I told her I was seeking legal advice about how to handle this because I didn't know whether I should sign the form or whether new counsel would file their own appearance. I made it clear that this was something I intended to discuss during the paid consultation, which I understood would cost between $650 and $1,300. Allison responded in a rude and dismissive tone: "We don't do that. Get your retainer back and then we'll schedule a consultation." I explained that I did not need my previous retainer returned in order to retain the firm and that I was prepared to pay their $25,000 retainer if I decided to move forward after the consultation. She then said she would call or email me to schedule it. I waited a couple of days and never heard back. Because I urgently needed legal assistance, I called Needle & Cuda again. During that call, I was told the firm likely could not take me as a client "because of the retainer issue," even though I had already clarified that I was prepared to pay their retainer. Despite reiterating that, I was told to call back later to schedule the consultation instead of simply scheduling it while I was already on the phone. When I followed those instructions and called back later that day, someone answered the phone and immediately hung up on me. I waited to see if it was a mistake and called back a few minutes later, but the phone just rang with no answer. The entire interaction was extremely disrespectful and unprofessional, especially given the seriousness of a domestic violence-related custody matter. Respectful communication during intake should be the bare minimum, and I do not understand why I was given the runaround instead of a clear answer. I cannot speak for the attorneys themselves, but based on my experience with the intake staff, I would strongly recommend looking elsewhere if you are seeking responsiveness, professionalism, or even basic courtesy. If this experience does not reflect how Needle & Cuda intends to treat potential clients in serious legal situations, I hope the partners review how intake calls are being handled.