I have to comment a bit on Caroline C's review of National Velvet, particularly her attitude about knowing what's best for the public use of funds and the justification for public art in denver or any city for that matter.
First of all, $50,000 may sound like a lot of money for a sculpture of any kind, but the reality is that it is very little for a major public work of art, particularly one of the size and medium that John has created for the Highlands bridge site. Anyone with any knowledge in this arena will attest that the artist couldn't possibly have made much income on the work, and in fact additional funds were sought to accomodate the lighting of the piece, something that also is not exactly cheap to do.
What angers me the most from her review (besides depicting herself as a kitten) is the absurd comments that devalue public art as a cultural and economic tool of value to the city. The city continually has money budgeted for public art through various initiatives that don't go away because of an economic crisis, they are policies that reflect the cultural awareness of the government and the citizens that support them.
"National Velvet" started as a brilliant idea from one of Colorado's most recognized and lauded artists, which managed to win over the selection committee asigned to this specific site and financial allocation for artwork. The budget, being quite low for a significant work of public art, would be seen as a challenge to any artist working in the public realm, and though McEnroe was awarded the commission, his initial idea had to be revised because of technical issues with the site and logistics that ultimately were deemed impossible to produce. He followed the proposal with an even better concept that ultimately became the work that was recently installed.
This commission was awarded in 2007, and even though Caroline is a brilliant citizen and economist who foresaw the collapse of the world financial markets, most people were conducting their business as usual back then, including artists, city employees, and citizens of all kinds. I am not going to argue that everyone should appreciate or even like this particular work by McEnroe or any work of art in the cities collection, rather I'm going to stand up for the idea that public art and advancing cultural concepts in Denver is ultimately of great importance and lasting value. It is one of the reasons (among many) that people on the streets are claiming that Denver is one of the least effected cities in the country in the current economic crisis. Whether this is true or not, my belief is that denver has created a profile for itself that any other city around the country of its stature would welcome, and much of that is due to how Denver has embraced the value of the arts and supported it both publicly and privately.
I willfully disclose that I represent John McEnroe at Plus Gallery in Denver. I also serve on the Mayors Commission for Cultural Affairs, which is a body of citizens that oversee the process and aproval of public art for the city and county of Denver. read more