I had a broken pipe line and a clogged tank with no water pressure. Sprinkler Solution came to the…read morerescue within 30 minutes from me contacting them. I was really impressed with the technician, he was professional, and well versed with troubleshooting the problem and figuring out an efficient solution. Mr. Martinez has a great company with exceptional customer solutions and service. I highly recommend Sprinkler Solutions and would go on the say that they are best Fire Sprinkler Protection in the DMV area. Brian K

They were very fast, very reasonable & did an excellent job! (sprinkler head pipe burst)read more

If I were Diogenes, I could set down my lantern--I have seen the face of an honest man--only she's…read morea woman: Pascale Maslin of Energy Efficiency Experts. Pepco sends me "good girl" messages, and then suddenly, I'm worse than other comparable households. I had an energy audit 6 years ago, and thought perhaps something had deteriorated. I misunderstood Pepco's home audit offer, and Pascale misunderstood that I had already used Pepco's rebate. She made an appointment promptly, showed up 5 minutes early. She checked the house and attic insulation and her able assistant was setting up all the heavy equipment for the blow test when she discovered that I was no longer eligible for the discount. I took a deep breath and said I could pay the full price. She said no, I didn't need it, and after looking at my Pepco usage history, said that my air conditioner needed compressor fluid and I could benefit from a timer on my dehumidifier. She repeatedly refused any payment, after giving me the advice I was looking for. I recommend EEE without reservation.

I out 3 stars becuase even h Though I like the first few encounters my service is not complete yet…read more It's been so far so good. I just started the process and going through inquires and quotes. So far the customer service has been informal and enthusiastic when I engaged with staff. I will post an update so I can provide a more in depth review.

I posted a review last year 04/27/25 with five stars and returned May 1st 2026. It was just before…read moreclosing and I got lost again. I did not see the technical staff from last year nor the office staff. I am please to say my comment from last year is still true today. The staff was all welcoming and made me feel at ease and relaxed. The tagging was quick and inexpensive. I will be back again next year. C. Weeden Washington, D.C.

Got tuned into the need to check my fire extinguishers after lately seeing so many deaths and…read moredestruction by house fires in the news. Without an education about inspection or servicing my extinguishers, I just assumed the units would work when needed and I would know instinctively how to use them. So, 'attending to my home's extinguishers' never made it to my to-do list. After getting a brief education on youTube, I learned how critical fire extinguishers are to home safety. Since Fire Departments are so enthusiastic about smoke, carbon dioxide, and radon detectors, I was disappointed to learn that not only do they not execute recharging and inspections but the service rep had no referrals. Recommendations to homeowners regarding fire extinguisher protocols, inspection, and usage should rate the same attention as their smoke detector promotions. Workshops on when and how to use fire extinguishers should be standard in our schools, hospitals, airports, businesses, home owner insurer inspections, etc as well as part of our Fire Departments' community education programming, locally and nationwide. Think about the potential exposures to fire during and after impacts on structures by extreme weather events. Moreover, so many vehicles have recalls with warnings of spontaneous combustion while driving and/or when garaged. Even airplanes, electric vehicles, and electronic devices have increased instances of battery fires and explosions. Domestic airlines just established a mandate that all battery packs and battery-driven devices be displayed and NOT packed in cargo OR in overhead cabin luggage due to recent fires. Nonetheless, my online search turned up F&M FIRE PROTECTION with a five star rating for inspection and recharging fire extinguishers, among other services. This company should be on the Fire Department's resource list for local fire extinguisher services. Though I figured my units were too old to recharge, rather than default to an online purchase, my choice to visit in person was the right move. This location is a great value if you are in the market for fire extinguishers, inspection, and/or recharging. After shopping by browser, I found per unit rates to be same as online with the added value of receiving a full understanding of related data points you may not have considered. Though the building is tucked away in an industrial park, GPS can get you there without a hitch. Worth the side trip to be struck by the high-spirited, personable attention you get, delivered by a light-hearted team with a gallery of antiques on display.

If you're waiting for a consultation with Deska Waterproofing, stick with it--they are worth the…read morewait. David evaluated our property in July after we had received several conflicting advice and heavy sales pitches from other providers. Unlike the rest, David focused on finding the right solution rather than making a quick sale. He gave us proactive steps to take immediately and clear indicators of when we might need further work done. I thoroughly appreciated his expertise and transparency, and Deska will be our first choice for any future waterproofing work.

Outstanding process done professionally. The entire structural repair project to our house was…read morewell organized, clearly explained, and promptly executed to our satisfaction. We especially appreciate Jose and his hardworking crew for their careful and neat work. There is no doubt we would choose them again if needed.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18pPnhHNvgP4zQYoVnJO3QH2wNIMW9iCe/view?usp=drivesdk…read more ONE STAR -- HOMEOWNERS SHOULD BE EXTREMELY CAUTIOUS BEFORE HIRING VALUE DRY Value Dry's response is long on personal attacks and remarkably short on answers to its own written documents. I stand by my review. My experience with Value Dry Waterproofing was deeply disappointing and, in my opinion, professionally and ethically unacceptable. I hired Value Dry for approximately $12,000 of foundation, masonry, sill/bearing, debris-removal, and structural-support work associated with getting my house properly back onto its foundation. I paid approximately $8,000. The agreed work was not completed. The most important facts are not allegations. They come from Value Dry's own written communications. JULY 13, 2026: Value Dry President James Ketterer met with me and prepared a written agreement addressing work that still remained. JULY 14, 2026: Mr. Ketterer put the remaining work in writing, including: * Installation of two Lally columns * Removal of the existing block columns and associated debris * Patching 12 openings with block/cement * Removal of concrete debris He also wrote that Value Dry was "working to bring your project to completion as agreed to in the agreements dated 6/20 and 7/13/2026." Those are Value Dry's words. Mr. Ketterer also acknowledged in writing that Value Dry's employee had not followed the proper change-order procedure. He explained that the unforeseen work and associated costs should have been detailed in writing and presented to me for my signature before proceeding. That admission is important. During the project, demolition and foundation-related work had already occurred when I was subsequently told that another approximately $1,500 would be required to restore openings. I disputed that charge because I had not approved it beforehand and asked Value Dry to explain in writing why that work supposedly fell outside the original agreement. This is exactly why written change orders exist. A homeowner should not be placed in a position where part of the house has already been opened or demolished and only afterward be confronted with an additional charge that was never approved in advance. Value Dry's Vice President of Operations subsequently confirmed that a crew was scheduled to return on July 21 to continue the work. Then something changed. JULY 17, 2026: Before the scheduled return date arrived, Mr. Ketterer canceled Value Dry's return, stated that Value Dry would perform no additional work, and declared that the payments already received represented adequate compensation for "the work completed." Those words matter. He did not say that all agreed work had been completed. In fact, only three days earlier, Value Dry had specifically identified work that still remained and stated that it was working to bring the project to completion. That is the central contradiction Value Dry should explain. Instead, its public response attacks me personally, discusses another contractor, speculates about my motives, and characterizes my communications as "harassment." None of that answers the documents. If Value Dry is going to publicly accuse a customer of threatening its president, then it should state exactly what was allegedly said, when it was allegedly said, who witnessed it, and what contemporaneous documentation supports the accusation. Yes, the July 13 discussion became heated. I have acknowledged that. But what happened afterward is highly significant: Value Dry still memorialized an agreement, identified remaining work in writing, acknowledged a failure in its change-order process, scheduled a crew to return, and continued discussing completion of the project. That documented sequence is difficult to reconcile with the dramatic characterization Value Dry is now presenting publicly. Value Dry also suggests that I demanded work beyond its obligations. Again, its own July 14 written communication says otherwise regarding the columns, openings, demolition, and debris work that Value Dry itself specifically identified as remaining. Value Dry further claims that the amount of money it retained was "fair and reasonable." Then provide the accounting. Show: * The total amount Value Dry retained * The work actually completed * The labor attributable to that completed work * The materials attributable to that completed work * The value assigned to each completed item * The work Value Dry acknowledged remained unfinished * The value assigned to that unfinished work Calling an amount "fair and reasonable" is not the same thing as demonstrating that it was fair and reasonable. Maryland Judiciary Case Search also publicly displays numerous court case entries involving VALUE DRY LLC / Value Dry Waterproofing over a period of years. To be clear, the existence of a court case does not itself establish wrongdoing, and I am not claiming that every case was decided against Value Dry. Anyone inte

Having an old house means dealing with new issues - such as water coming into our crawlspace…read more Brendan, Chad, and the whole team did a great job of laying out what was happening, answering our questions, and ensuring that we were satisfied with the work. If you're like we were - facing unknown water issues/smells coming from your crawlspace, I would highly recommend contacting Value Dry.

Donnie and his team helped install a sump pump. They were quick and responsive and helped work…read morethrough a part supply issue quickly. Donnie took a lot of time to walk through what he and his team would do and what he did after the fact. I really enjoyed working with him and 58 on the sump pump installation.

I try to give folks the benefit of the doubt, recognizing that unique circumstances in a one-off…read moreproject don't always give a great sense of a company. However... we were led along by 58 for 4 months and told they would solve a foundation issue under an addition to our house built in 1982. The individual who came to our house seemed highly knowledgable and was confident that he knew the problem - he said that all other quotes we received were rubbish and didn't understand the issue. So... fast forward 4 months after a hassle of getting the right information to them for permits (seemed excessively long time, but ok, it's government). People who we've never talked to or worked with from 58 show up to do the job. They literally ask us, "what is the problem? what do we need to do?" First red flag. So we show them the problem that 58 has already done all the specs for. An hour later we get a knock and they call us to observe the problem, saying they cannot do the work because of the structure. They dug up a bunch of stuff and littered it around our yard (which, they said would probably happen but more frustrating that these workers never came back). We have to call 58 to figure out the problem (second red flag) and the person brushes it off like yeah already on it (ok then tell us you're already on it?). We continue to ask them for info for another month and it's well into winter now. We wanted to issue solved in the summer before the snow came. He finally gets back to us and says that they can't do the job and "are very sorry". That was it. We asked for the engineering plans to try and find out what the problem was. Never got those. We were never given compensation for them destroying our yard and not finishing the job. The best thing that happened is we got our deposit back. I'm sure everyone's experience is different, but I've never had a worse experience with someone providing a service. I'm a pretty chill person. But I'm still boiling about this a couple months later, so felt the need to write a stern review.

I would not recommend this business…read more I had an active leak in my condo on a Saturday afternoon, with water coming through the ceiling and into a hardwired smoke detector. The alarm was going off, my property manager's emergency line was not answering, and the condo association's published emergency number was invalid. I eventually called the non-emergency fire station because I was concerned about water in the smoke detector and whether it could affect the building's alarm/sprinkler system. Hours later, around 10:30 PM, I received a call from someone who described himself as calling from an "emergency line." In that moment, I assumed he was connected to the property manager, condo association, or emergency response, and I started explaining the situation because I thought help had finally arrived. Instead, after a gut feeling something was "off", I discovered that he had gotten my name from fire department dispatch information and was contacting me to solicit business. Even after I told him I did not appreciate being called at 10:30 at night with him claiming to respond to my emergency call, he demanded the names of the property manager and property owner. That is wildly inappropriate. An active leak involving water damage and a smoke detector is not a marketing opportunity. Using emergency-response information and vague "emergency line" language to get someone on the phone during an active crisis is misleading and predatory. I would never hire or recommend someone who conducts business this way. I didn't trust this guy after just a few minutes on the phone with him, I definitely wouldn't let him in my house.

One of the worst companies to deal with. The insurance company had suggested them and I used them…read morefor water damage that occurred in my house. they were punctual in coming to the place. But after couple of days they stated that they need testing to be done and charged 1500$ for it, which wasn't approved by the insurance. I have called this company and tried to reach out to Julian atleast 10 times over the last 3 weeks. And his team mentions that he is in a meeting and will call back. But so far he has been unresponsive to any of the calls. Julian Rodriguez | Regional Branch Manager ServiceMaster Restoration Services - Mid-Atlantic E: jrodriguez@smrestore.net I will highly advise that you work with a different restoration company as they keep on adding different cost and expecting the insurance company will either ways pay for it. If the insurance company denies that cost will roll over to you all. VERY unprofessional dealing with them so far.

Extremely professional, timely and courteous Excellent work, Alex and crew completed extensive…read morework with in 2 days and always kept us informed on progress. Would recommend 100% Kadjeski

Terrible customer service, i have been trying to schedule a maintenance appointment fot 2 months…read more Mark dosen't follow through. He said he would schedule but haven't herd back. Left several messages. Would not recommend