1. Martinez Hsu, PC

0

Bedford, TX

Cancel

Open app

Search

Martinez Hsu, PC

3.0 (2 reviews)
Open • 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Services - Martinez Hsu, PC

Divorce law

Family law

Martinez Hsu, PC Photos

You might also consider

Recommended Reviews - Martinez Hsu, PC

Your trust is our priority, so businesses can't pay to alter or remove their reviews. Learn more about reviews.
Yelp app icon
Browse more easily on the app
Review Feed Illustration

8 months ago

Efficient, caring, and allowed me to drive the divorce. Very helpful legal advice along the way.

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

9 months ago

Helpful 0
Thanks 0
Love this 0
Oh no 0

You might also consider

Verify this business for free

People searched for Divorce & Family Law 2,267 times last month within 20 miles of this business.

Verify this business

Bailey & Galyen Attorneys at Law

Bailey & Galyen Attorneys at Law

(35 reviews)

We needed a local attorney, who deals with wills, in order to complete the probate of my wife's…read moremother. We contacted Attorney Bailey at his office in Bedford. Our experience in dealing with Mr. Bailey and his paralegal, Demetra, was excellent. The whole process was long, but finally ended in us retrieving the money in question. We highly recommend this law firm! Fernando and Maria Candelario

We hired Bailey & Galyen specifically to help us collect an unpaid construction balance and…read morepreserve our lien rights. Our experience with attorney Michael Cramer was extremely disappointing and, in our opinion, his handling of the matter left us in a substantially worse legal position. We first contacted Bailey & Galyen on May 12-13, 2026. We were told we could speak with an attorney for a $150 consultation fee, which we paid. Our consultation with Michael Cramer took place on May 14 at approximately 1:30 p.m. During that consultation, all of the circumstances and relevant dates were disclosed to him. Mr. Cramer advised us that, under Texas law, we had until June 15, 2026 to file our lien and that we could seek 18% interest from the homeowner. Based on that advice, we hired the firm. We paid an additional $1,800 on May 18 and signed their engagement agreement so they could send a demand letter. My partner followed up on May 21, May 22, and May 27 because we wanted to make sure everything was being handled promptly and that our lien rights were protected. We were eventually told that the demand had been sent by certified mail on May 21, giving the homeowner 15 days to pay while, as we understood it, still leaving sufficient time to file the lien. The homeowner did not pay. On June 2, we specifically authorized Bailey & Galyen to proceed with filing the lien. We signed another agreement and paid another $1,850, which included the $50 filing fee. Beginning June 9, my partner repeatedly called and emailed the firm to make sure the lien had actually been filed. More than a dozen attempts were made to get an answer. We were repeatedly told that Mr. Cramer was in court and would call the next day. Those promised calls did not happen. My partner continued following up because the entire reason we hired the firm was to protect our lien rights before the deadline they themselves had given us. Despite more than a dozen calls and emails, we did not finally speak with Mr. Cramer until July 24. At that point, we were informed that the lien had not been filed. That is the part we find completely unacceptable. We did not hire this firm merely for general legal advice. We specifically paid them to file a lien. We signed an agreement authorizing them to do it, paid the requested legal fee and filing cost, and repeatedly contacted them before and around the deadline to make sure it was done. It wasn't. As a result, instead of having the lien rights we hired this firm to protect, we are now left pursuing a potentially costly lawsuit against the homeowner without the security and leverage that a properly filed lien could have provided. Even if we prevail in litigation, we may then have to pursue collection rather than having the remedies that would have been available to us had the lien been properly and timely filed. We cannot know why this was allowed to happen despite our repeated attempts to follow up. Given the number of unanswered calls and emails, and the fact that we had specifically paid the firm to file the lien, we find the situation extremely troubling. Based on our experience, we would not recommend Michael Cramer or Bailey & Galyen for a time-sensitive construction lien matter. When you hire an attorney specifically to protect a statutory deadline, pay the attorney to perform that work, and repeatedly follow up before the deadline, you should be able to rely on the attorney to either complete the work or immediately tell you if there is a problem. That did not happen here, and the consequences to our company are potentially significant.

Holland McGill Law - Logo

Holland McGill Law

(6 reviews)

I stopped in unannounced to ask for assistance on handling my mother's estate. I've never used an…read moreattorney before - never even spoken to one before - and came to the Holland McGill Law firm because my mother had them do her will six years ago. Janine McGill was very empathetic and professional, reassuring me that her firm could assist me in handling her estate settlement and my role as executor. I couldn't be more pleased with the help I received. Janine accompanied me throughout the probate process - in court, filings, and communications - something I would never have been able to do myself. She's a very upbeat, pleasant, yet professional attorney, and she and her office staff kept in touch and kept me updated throughout the entire process. Her billing was honest and completely upfront (she uses Clio for Clients portal) and she is accessible in her office on Bedford-Euless Rd. I highly recommend Janine McGill and The Holland McGill Law Firm for wills and estate planning. Thank you, Jeanine!

I called to set up a consultation. They scheduled me for the next day at 2pm…read more They call the next morning and change it to 3 as they claim another client could not make any other time but 2 and needed the time slot. (cool, guess my time is not important),but I agree. I panicked and and did ask if we could make it a phone call as I had to get to my second job and was worried about being late, they agreed. 3:52 rolls around and they called to see if they could reschedule for the following day at 1pm because they were in litigation and could not break away. Sure, phone call at 1. Following day- 1:15 rolls around I call them and am told, "Tammy will call you". 2 rolls around, I call they pick up and hang up. 2:20 rolls around, I call, and they pick up and hang up again. At this point just tell me you are too busy to take on new clients and do not waste my time. If you want to feel like your time has value, that you are worth listening to, that you deserve being treated with fairness, then I would not suggest wasting your time here.

Martinez Hsu, PC - divorce - Updated November 2026

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...